1 posted on
01/20/2006 1:47:59 AM PST by
Mia T
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...
2 posted on
01/20/2006 1:53:51 AM PST by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: UWSrepublican
3 posted on
01/20/2006 1:57:39 AM PST by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
Is there one single member of Congress out of the entire 535 that is loyal enough to the American people that he will see this released in full?
If there were a way I could bet against it I would. I don't think that in the entirety of Congress there is such a person.
To: Mia T
All a congressman has to do is leak it to the NYT.
Then they will run with it.
7 posted on
01/20/2006 2:11:53 AM PST by
Notwithstanding
(I love my German shepherd - Benedict XVI reigns!)
To: Mia T
My guess is that we'll see our dauntless Republicans sit by and dlinch under corruption and spying charges the Dems try to fling at them in this election year, while they "nobly" keep this report buried.
In case the foregoing was too vague:
HEY, DIMWITS. IF THEY CONTINUE TO SLIME YOU WITH THIS "CORRUPTION" CRAP, RELEASE THIS REPORT AND SHOW AMERICA WHO IS CORRUPT AND WHO INAPPROPRIATELY ABUSED THEIR POWER TO SPY ON ORDINARY CITIZENS.
Sheesh. There's no hope for these idiots.
To: Mia T
I emailed my Senator (Lindsay Graham) yesterday. I may call his office today.
17 posted on
01/20/2006 3:08:11 AM PST by
visualops
(www.visualops.com)
To: ancient_geezer; pigdog; Bigun; Principled; PhilWill; ScaniaBoy; Cooter; eyespysomething; B4Ranch; ..
24 posted on
01/20/2006 3:25:04 AM PST by
ovrtaxt
(I looked for common sense with a telescope. All I could see was the moon of Uranus.)
To: Mia T
There is some mileage to be had in keeping it secret: People begin to wonder what is so terrible that so much effort went into hiding it. They begin to imagine what horrible things the Democrats don't want to see the light of day. Conjecture and imagination. If the report is fully released, it is possible it may not be as bad as the public imagined. Still, if it is released, the MSM will not be able to ignore it forever.
27 posted on
01/20/2006 4:07:54 AM PST by
sportutegrl
(People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
To: Mia T
28 posted on
01/20/2006 4:13:39 AM PST by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: Mia T
Well, next time I get a request for a donation from a Senator or Congressperson, I know what I'm going to send them:
I think a similar thing helped a lot to get them concerned about illegal alien invaders, (the Nada Peso 'bills' from SacredCowBurgers.com) no reason why it won't help with this.
To: Mia T
Only 120 pages? Nothing to see here, move along. I wonder who's on Entertainment Tonight tonight? What did I do with my copy of People Magazine....
Morning bump!
33 posted on
01/20/2006 4:51:47 AM PST by
FlyVet
To: Mia T
Good grief! Let it go already. They've been gone for 5 years now.
36 posted on
01/20/2006 4:58:31 AM PST by
DaGman
To: Mia T
To: Mia T
One thing is for sure: A Politican can't keep his/her mouth shut, it will leak out soon.....
45 posted on
01/20/2006 6:44:28 AM PST by
HarleyLady27
(My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
To: Mia T; joanie-f; planekT; glock rocks; Pete-R-Bilt; Iowa Granny; Travis McGee; yoe
This is the kind of thing that I mean when I say that Republican and Democrat legislators are holding hands, walking in lockstep and sleeping in the same single space bed using each others shoulders to cry on while they sleep. If we don't have at least 200 Republican Congressmen jointly signing the publication orders then WE MUST NOT RE-ELECT A SINGLE ONE OF THEM!
The entire current list of names in Congress are all liars, traitors to their Oath of Office in my eyes.
The fact that our Presidentand the Republican Senators haven't pushed the Republican Congressmen to publish the entire report shows me that they fall under the same catagory as those in Congress.
We do not have a two party system in our government! What more does it take to prove this to America? How long must we live a lie?
59 posted on
01/20/2006 10:41:17 AM PST by
B4Ranch
(No expiration date is on the Oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic.)
To: All
CORRECTIONS + ADDITIONS
REDACTION LOOPHOLE: ACCESS TO THE BARRETT REPORT
- by Mia T, 01.20.06
he judges who redacted 120 pages of the Barrett report have, if not a sense of justice, a sense of humor. In their rulings, they provide a mechanism by which the people can see the redactions, but for which at least one honest, selfless, courageous member of Congress is required.
The way it works: Any member of Congress can see the redactions simply by requesting access, and, unlike Barrett, can publish the redactions "without fear of legal sanction."1 The serious '"culture of corruption" in the clinton DOJ and IRS detailed by the Barrett report makes one wonder about the nature of the crimes and abuse that the clintons felt compelled to redact. Even a small subset of what we do know about the redactions argues for their immediate disclosure by Congress. (Only in the surreal world of the clintons would someone suggest with a straight face that disclosure of the crime of obstruction of justice is precluded by privacy considerations.) We know that clinton pettifoggers labored mightily and long to gut and bury this report with some 140 motions, assorted sleights of hand... and, whenever necessary, the clintons' heavy hand. We know that charges of retaliatory IRS audits of both the clintons' political foes and the clintons' victims of rape and predation are said to be included in the redacted material. The mutual protection racket writ large is apparently alive and well in DC. (Is Filegate rearing its ugly head yet again?) We mustn't let Congress get away with this coverup. Call. E-mail. Fax. Don't let up. And remember the responses. On Election Day.
- The Barrett report, Robert Novak, Jan 19, 2006
|
deconstructing clinton
"just because I could"
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!
-
|
December 7, 1941+64
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
Dear Concerned Americans,
Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor. The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive. We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will? In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst? Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival. What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times. COMPLETE LETTER
December 7, 1941+64 Mia T AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
|
|
-
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
77 posted on
01/20/2006 4:36:45 PM PST by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
You know, you are extremely annoying. Not only do you repost information that appeared here days ago, you spam your posts with the same old re-hashed crap and kiddie photoshopped images with which you spam every post.
It's getting very old, very quickly.
Search before you post, gain some humility, and get a life.
87 posted on
01/20/2006 7:39:41 PM PST by
Philistone
(Turning lead into gold...)
To: Mia T
94 posted on
01/20/2006 10:10:58 PM PST by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Mia T
115 posted on
01/23/2006 4:22:23 AM PST by
gakrak
("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
To: Mia T
Thanks a million, Mia. Bump for truth!
121 posted on
01/28/2006 6:52:21 AM PST by
demkicker
(democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson