Skip to comments.
Gays' 'blood war' slammed
Herald Sun ^
| 16 January 2006
Posted on 01/15/2006 2:29:21 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Those involved should be charged and locked up.
Do these people have any sense of responsibility at all?
To: Aussie Dasher
2
posted on
01/15/2006 2:31:34 PM PST
by
presidio9
(Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.)
To: Aussie Dasher
3
posted on
01/15/2006 2:31:53 PM PST
by
brivette
To: Aussie Dasher
4
posted on
01/15/2006 2:33:15 PM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Surrender! - Vote Democrat.)
To: Aussie Dasher
"Blood donation is not a right, it's a privilege. Everybody has to meet the right criteria," she said. Perhaps it would have driven the point home to the gays had she said "Blood TRANSFUSIONS are not a right, but a kindness, and not everybody deserves the kindness.
5
posted on
01/15/2006 2:33:25 PM PST
by
adamsjas
To: Aussie Dasher
Oh, this is a GREAT p.r. move for gay people. This is the perfect way to win over public opinion!
To: Aussie Dasher
What is wrong with these people?? They just crossed the line from perversion to MURDER.
To: Aussie Dasher
Gays place more importance on the acknowledgment of their sexual status than the health and well being of the general public. They try to say that their being gay doesn't affect those around them. Obviously the "Gay attitude" does. In this case, it may result in the murder of an innocent bystander. If so, I hope the innocent bystander is gay them self. Being gay is a CHOICE!
8
posted on
01/15/2006 2:37:29 PM PST
by
Arcy
To: Aussie Dasher
Well, right there is just an example of the crux of the problem. You got all these folks including some politicians out there that are trying to preach a view that homosexuality is perfectly fine and natural and just another normal way to express their sexuality - and that runs all the way to examples like SSM becoming legalized in Canada. So if it is perfectly fine and natural, on what grounds shouldn't they be allowed to donate blood? Hmmmm... if the conclusion is faulty, try going back to the original premise.
To: Aussie Dasher
I just don't understand these people. I am considered higher risk for Mad Cow Disease because I lived in Europe in the early 80's (and visited the UK in that time). I am not supposed to give blood, and I understand that. If I do have some sort of infectious disease, I certainly do not want to risk spreading it. Why do people have to put politics and stunts above the well being of others?
To: Aussie Dasher
These people are worthless. All they care about is "me, me, me!"
To: Aussie Dasher
Might as well question gravity.
12
posted on
01/15/2006 2:49:48 PM PST
by
Old Professer
(Fix the problem, not the blame!)
To: conservative cat
The Gays sued and lost the "Right" to donate blood in this country. Keeping the blood supply HIV free is "Heteronormative".
Most veterans who were stationed in southern Europe are banned from giving blood due to Mad Cow. I'm one of the Mad Cow carrying group.
13
posted on
01/15/2006 2:50:13 PM PST
by
Wristpin
("The Yankees have decided to buy every player in Baseball....")
To: Arcy
In this case, it may result in the murder of an innocent bystander. If so, I hope the innocent bystander is gay them self.The sexual orientation of the victim does not matter. If he dies, he deserves justice against these homo-sociopaths.
To: Wristpin; conservative cat
Cancer "survivors" like me are excluded from donating blood products for life, but you don't hear me bitchin' and moanin.' The only people carrying on about being excluded are the alternate-lifestylers. Why should they receive breaks that you and I do not? A safe blood supply is the paramount object, not the ability of high-risk groups to donate blood.
To: Aussie Dasher
Like firing a shotgun into a crowd. They should be tried for murder/attempted murder.
To: Aussie Dasher
I for one think it's great. Gays should be encouraged to give blood, and to identify themselves proudly. Then, when a gay needs a transfusion, they'll have a ready supply of gay blood to give him.
17
posted on
01/15/2006 3:07:41 PM PST
by
Shalom Israel
(Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
To: Aussie Dasher
The group's members lied about their sexual status on an admission form and only after donating blood told the SANBS that 65 per cent of them had engaged in high-risk sexual behaviour and were unsure of their HIV status, while at least one member had full-blown AIDS. In other words, the blood supply is wrecked. When people start dying because they can't get blood in a medical emergency, their families can direct all lawsuits to the GLA. They can work their 50-cent prison jobs their whole lives to pay it off. Bunch of scumbags.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
And of course the the gay agendists could care less about increasing the risk of HIV infection via accidental needle stick to the blood drawers. Thats a real problem in the healthcare workers.
19
posted on
01/15/2006 3:27:42 PM PST
by
Wristpin
("The Yankees have decided to buy every player in Baseball....")
To: Aussie Dasher
A few years ago I was behind a car on the freeway...on the left rear bumper was the "Give blood - the gift of life" sticker....but on the right bumper was a gay rainbow decal.
Shudder...
20
posted on
01/15/2006 3:29:54 PM PST
by
ErnBatavia
(I post in slang..live with it or ignore it - reader's choice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson