Skip to comments.
Samuel Alito ~ Senate Judiciary Hearing [LIVE THREAD] (Day-3)
Senate Judiciary ^
| 1-11-06
| Senate Judiciary
Posted on 01/11/2006 5:01:17 AM PST by OXENinFLA
Day 3: Questioning Continues
This morning, Round 1 concludes with Senators on the Judiciary Cmte. who did not question nominee Alito yesterday. During Round 2, questioning is limited to 20 minutes for each of the eight- een senators. Chairman Arlen Specter (R-PA) leads off, followed by the others, alternating by party in order of seniority.
WEDS., 9:30AM ET, C-SPAN
Live LinksC-span
Judiciary LIVE LINK
FEDNET
CapitolHearings.org
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitoakbar; alitohearings; alitorulz; babykilling; bidenisamoron; bush2rats0; clangingcymbals; demsareduds; emptybarrels; feingoldstinks; feinsteinreeks; judicialnominees; judiciary; kennedysucks; penumbra; scotus; senate; super; superduper; superduperduper; welldecided
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,701-2,720, 2,721-2,740, 2,741-2,760 ... 3,801-3,808 next last
To: Steven W.
I wish he would answer by saying "I guess, Senator, this is why others before me more wisely refused to answer your stupid questions."
To: maggief
Is it me or does .... Schummmmmmmmmmmmmer look like a rat?
2,722
posted on
01/11/2006 2:05:48 PM PST
by
JFC
(W, I am with YA)
To: saveliberty
5:01 Schumer wants fewer responses and more answers.
5:02 Liberty Valance wants fewer bloviating speeches by rat senators and more single paragraph questions.
To: AliVeritas
why are you so hung up on the "prep docs" - that's like the non-starter to Vanguard! ROFLMAO
To: sageb1
Did you see Alito's wife crying?
She had to get up and leave the room during Graham's comment on the smearing of her husband, she was so touched.
Graham had tears in his eyes too.
I despise these liberal bastards!
2,725
posted on
01/11/2006 2:05:59 PM PST
by
roses of sharon
("I would rather men ask why I have no statue, than why I have one". ) (Cato the Elder)
To: conservativebabe
It is inexcusable and reprehensible. Sounds like Schumer.
2,726
posted on
01/11/2006 2:06:03 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(Anyone who needs to be persuaded to be free, doesn't deserve to be. -El Neil)
To: rwa265; ilovew; Chuck54
Thank you for the info! Must see TV~!
To: mware
>>>LOL, talking about select eating societies<<<
This must be a reference to Abramoff's restaurant.
2,728
posted on
01/11/2006 2:06:19 PM PST
by
Palladin
(Senator Biden is a Moron with a capital "M".)
To: defenderSD; All
Why would Graham care if people know he helped Alito prepare for the hearing? So what.
I don't think that he[Graham] necessarily does. But I am wondering why Finegold, the opposition, cares who was involved in the process. I can't imagine that it is just harmless curiosity; can you? Graham didn't bring it up in his just ended question period, so that indicates that it is not a burning issue for him.
2,729
posted on
01/11/2006 2:06:28 PM PST
by
PerConPat
(A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.-- Mencken)
To: mware
Oh shit, he just interrupted him after all that. Let Chucky talk then.
2,730
posted on
01/11/2006 2:06:37 PM PST
by
AliVeritas
(DNC - The longer the nose, the more we expose. Stick and Bucket Brigade, Able Danger, Barrett)
To: syriacus
very good!
Senator Schmucky
He's so yukky
That's the best I can do....I'm no poet, now everybody knows it! LOL
2,731
posted on
01/11/2006 2:06:39 PM PST
by
Jrabbit
(Kaufman County, Texas)
To: Steven W.
I want to smack Schumer with a hammer repeatedly! What an @$$!
2,732
posted on
01/11/2006 2:06:39 PM PST
by
defconw
( Allen/Pence 2008 Operation Put Up or Shut Up)
To: Sea2ShiningSea
chuckie just needs to tell all of america, that he and his party would like to keep innocent babies to be aborted. That is all he seems to care about, so get your little aide to print out a large banner saying that..... you PIG!
2,733
posted on
01/11/2006 2:07:27 PM PST
by
JFC
(W, I am with YA)
To: AliVeritas
They are going to charge improper conduct... he helped prepare him. Against Graham, the argument (lame it is) goes like this ...
Coaching a judicial nominee behind-the-scenes is not the proper role for a Judiciary Committee member who must subsequently sit in judgment on that nominee. Indeed, it could be a violation of the ethical duties of a senator. Here's what Senate Rule 37 (Conflicts of Interest) in the Senate Ethics Manual says:
"No Member, officer, or employee shall engage in any outside business or professional activity or employment for compensation which is inconsistent or in conflict with the conscientious performance of official duties.'' ... The Committee has interpreted this paragraph to prohibit compensated employment or uncompensated positions on boards, commissions, or advisory councils where such service could create a conflict with an individual's Senate duties due to appropriation, oversight, authorization, or legislative jurisdiction as a result of Senate duties.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/09/graham-ethics/
The unspoken argument is that Alito will not be idependent when matters involving exexutive prerogative get to SCOTUS, e.g., FISA/NSA, detention of enemy combatants.
To: saveliberty
Schumer wants fewer responses and more answers. For the love of Elvis, I could not believe my ears on that one. He's trying to top "I voted for it before I voted against it." Is below-room-temp-IQ a requirement to run for office as a RAT? I think it IS!
2,735
posted on
01/11/2006 2:07:29 PM PST
by
Fudd Fan
(God bless President Bush! (Water Bucket Brigade member - MOOSEMUSS!)
To: Steven W.
Schumer is something that rhymes with glass bowl
2,736
posted on
01/11/2006 2:07:33 PM PST
by
saveliberty
(Proud to be Head Snowflake and Bushbot)
To: Jrabbit
To: tioga
Schumer acting like a sideshow huckster.
"Tell us your answer. You might get lucky with the Democrats, just like Ruth Gader Binsburg got lucky with the Republicans when she was a nominee."
2,738
posted on
01/11/2006 2:07:38 PM PST
by
syriacus
(Chuck Schumer is outclassed intellectually by Bush's judicial nominees.)
To: AliVeritas
More Chuckie talks the less Alito is forced to say and that is just fine with me.
To: defconw
I'd like to smack all the NY voters who keep electing Schumer, with that hammer.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,701-2,720, 2,721-2,740, 2,741-2,760 ... 3,801-3,808 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson