Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DeLay Will Quit Leadership Post in House
Breitbart ^ | Today | DAVID ESPO

Posted on 01/07/2006 9:23:30 AM PST by Gipper08

By DAVID ESPO AP Special Correspondent

WASHINGTON

Embattled Rep. Tom DeLay decided Saturday to give up his post as House majority leader, clearing the way for new leadership elections among House Republicans eager to shed the taint of scandal, two officials said.

These officials said DeLay, R-Texas, was preparing a letter informing fellow House Republicans of his decision. These officials spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they did not want to pre-empt the formal announcement.

DeLay is battling campaign finance charges in Texas and was forced to step aside temporarily as majority leader last fall after he was charged in his home state. He has consistently maintained his innocence and said he intended to resume his leadership post once cleared.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006; abramoff; corruption; delay; democratswin; leadershio; majorityleader; resignation; texastoast
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 541-549 next last
To: Theodore R.
This is such a crock, the only thing Delay is guilty of is helping to get more Republicans elected to congress.

All campaign finance laws need to be repealed.

Every donation to a political candidate, at it's root, is an attempted bribe.
201 posted on 01/07/2006 10:40:37 AM PST by conservative physics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: All
He's not giving up his house seat - just his leadership position! The Rats only won half a victory!
202 posted on 01/07/2006 10:40:40 AM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Gipper08

I agree, Abramhof is looming bedhind this move,


203 posted on 01/07/2006 10:40:58 AM PST by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches, hard to get rid of.>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
We have won 7 of the last 10 presidential elections and we have controlled the congress since 1994.

Who is "We"? Republicans or Conservatives?

204 posted on 01/07/2006 10:41:21 AM PST by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
Because the Republican Party has no core principles to stand for and defend, other than getting reelected.

You are way out of line here. My opinion.

It is the Democrat Party has no core principles to stand for and defend, other than getting elected.

And if you think otherwise, you are a nut.

205 posted on 01/07/2006 10:41:25 AM PST by staytrue (MOONBAT conservatives are those who would rather lose to a liberal than support a moderate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianCandidate

"Hopefully the Abramoff scandal will create a boost for the minor parties as more people realize the real depth of corruption in the two major parties."

Hallelujah and Amen to that!


206 posted on 01/07/2006 10:41:50 AM PST by voteconstitutionparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

How did we win when Delay rammed through the prescription drug benefit? Or the highway (robbery!) bill?


207 posted on 01/07/2006 10:42:02 AM PST by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Gipper08
We can use him in the future as a role player under a Conservative Speaker(Mike Pence)

It's very likely that you, Pence, and I will not live long enough to see another Republican speaker of the house.

208 posted on 01/07/2006 10:42:06 AM PST by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Gipper08
So maybe someone will run who thinks that there IS there is fat to be cut from the frderal budget.
209 posted on 01/07/2006 10:42:16 AM PST by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Krauthammer was just on Fox saying Abramoff investigation is what brought Delay down. Two scandals at once and the fact that Abramoff investigation is going to take too long. It'll hurt the Party. I fear Bush is a lame duck.


210 posted on 01/07/2006 10:42:24 AM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
"So, Republicans, how's that "limited government" thingie you've been promising us for decades coming along . . . . hmmmmm?"

Hey, who's the one who's got that veto pen to review over-bloated budget proposals...and STILL hasn't used it? (just checkin')

211 posted on 01/07/2006 10:42:47 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
It also says that leadership wanted to reform our nation's intelligence agencies as soon as possible. It didn't say that leadership didn't want immigration reform. There's a logical difference.

Don't be a DUmmy. You can't claim both that Delay is an effective leader, and yet that he has no input into the "House GOP Leadership." Both are mutually exclusive.

So instead of documenting your point you are now hiding behind name calling.

What part of the above in bold are you too dopey to get?

212 posted on 01/07/2006 10:43:03 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Owen
There are some self styled principle advocates running around FR trying to undercut the GOP. It is, and always has been, about strictly and only denying power to the party that is least conservative. You will never ever ever get people as conservative as you wish. You must marshall your forces to deny victory to the opposition because that's all you are ever going to be able to achieve. And a magnificent achievement it is.

Thank you for posting.

213 posted on 01/07/2006 10:43:04 AM PST by staytrue (MOONBAT conservatives are those who would rather lose to a liberal than support a moderate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: adam_az

I'm in... Color me crotchety


214 posted on 01/07/2006 10:43:12 AM PST by Sweetjustusnow (Oust the IslamoCommies here and abroad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Did DeLay cite his dance with Earle as the reason for stepping aside?

I didn't hear his statement but I would think the Abramoff stuff is the greater reason. IMO, Earle would've proved a minor distraction but Abramoff (assuming DeLay is also innocent here), is a larger distraction which would have made it much harder for him as majority leader and for the Republican portion of the House.
This move doesn't surprise me and it was likely the right thing to do if he's really interested in allowing the Republican agenda to move forward. Nevertheless, the MSM will spin this as a victory for Earle.
Now, the House Republicans better get a good conservative as majority leader and not some male cheerleader! Mike Pence has been named here on FR, but I don't know much about him. If someone could fill me in or provide a link (about Pence), I would appreciate it.

215 posted on 01/07/2006 10:43:36 AM PST by batter ("Never let the enemy pick the battle site." - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Quoting a very cheezy Kenny Rogers song, "You got to know when to hold 'em, and know when to fold 'em." Reality is what it is. Every member of the House has an election in 10 months, and the GOP caucus has to get this out of the way now.

If RATS get control of the House, it is going to get very ugly. For instance, John Conyers will be the Judiciary Committee chairman. Impeachment hearings would begin within ten minutes of that and the press would be handed a parade of lies against the President and the GOP.


216 posted on 01/07/2006 10:43:38 AM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: RetSignman

Great minds...


217 posted on 01/07/2006 10:43:39 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Alissa

"Krauthammer was just on Fox saying Abramoff investigation is what brought Delay down. Two scandals at once and the fact that Abramoff investigation is going to take too long. It'll hurt the Party. I fear Bush is a lame duck."

He flew South (to Mexico) a long time ago and never flew back.


218 posted on 01/07/2006 10:43:42 AM PST by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
All what you do is bash the Republicans and President Bush. Please do not tell me that you voted for Bush twice, and you worked you a** off in 2004 to elect President Bush. No one who bash the President and the Republicans as you do, is going to sacrifice one second to work for their elections.
219 posted on 01/07/2006 10:44:08 AM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Alissa; All

The Abramoff scandal will hurt both the Republican AND the Democratic Party. Watch to see some major third parties pop up. The American people are already disgusted with Both parties. The Abramoff scandal will only confirm that.


220 posted on 01/07/2006 10:44:17 AM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 541-549 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson