Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DeLay Will Quit Leadership Post in House
Breitbart ^ | Today | DAVID ESPO

Posted on 01/07/2006 9:23:30 AM PST by Gipper08

By DAVID ESPO AP Special Correspondent

WASHINGTON

Embattled Rep. Tom DeLay decided Saturday to give up his post as House majority leader, clearing the way for new leadership elections among House Republicans eager to shed the taint of scandal, two officials said.

These officials said DeLay, R-Texas, was preparing a letter informing fellow House Republicans of his decision. These officials spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they did not want to pre-empt the formal announcement.

DeLay is battling campaign finance charges in Texas and was forced to step aside temporarily as majority leader last fall after he was charged in his home state. He has consistently maintained his innocence and said he intended to resume his leadership post once cleared.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006; abramoff; corruption; delay; democratswin; leadershio; majorityleader; resignation; texastoast
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 541-549 next last
To: Vision

"That's Barbara Streisand. Give some examples where Flake has been a better leader then Delay"

How about voting his principles as a small-government conservative 100% of the time?


101 posted on 01/07/2006 9:59:02 AM PST by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Vision

Well ON ANY BUDGET BILL,or Spending bill or anything that involves money.


102 posted on 01/07/2006 9:59:08 AM PST by Gipper08 (Mike Pence in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Gipper08

Ok, thanks.


103 posted on 01/07/2006 9:59:22 AM PST by Jrabbit (Kaufman County, Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: adam_az

No, it's your sarcasm I want you to explain


104 posted on 01/07/2006 9:59:44 AM PST by Vision (“We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the duty of intelligent men")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: grizzly84
"And the rats bring down yet another good man."

Nope.

The GOP "leadership" failed as usual to stand tall and back one of its warriors....

But this gives them an excuse to plug in yet another RINO into Party as it continue drifting towards the center.

105 posted on 01/07/2006 9:59:51 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
How about if the we put someone who is as tough as Delay in the majority leader position. What did the democrats gain in this case? Absolutely nothing.
106 posted on 01/07/2006 10:00:14 AM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Ronnie Earle, that sleazy weasel, wins this round.

Did DeLay cite his dance with Earle as the reason for stepping aside?

107 posted on 01/07/2006 10:00:25 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

"Why do they let the rats get away with doing this crap to them day in and day out?"

No leadership among Republicans.


108 posted on 01/07/2006 10:00:30 AM PST by RouxStir (Peaceful Muslim?.....The Ultimate Oxymoron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Flake deliberately called the anti-american MSM, (who are in the process of defeated us in a war), to trash his leader who is under fire.

He has learned from McCain, and believes his political life lies with the MSM.

He is desperately wrong.


Amen. What the hell is wrong with everybody?
109 posted on 01/07/2006 10:01:01 AM PST by Vision (“We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the duty of intelligent men")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Gipper08
Gipper,

Everyone is pissing and moaning what a loss this is, I don't think so, he has the brains to get out of the way.

Duke Cunningham wore a wire to get Abramoff, the question is why is Reid so quiet all of a sudden? Who else did Duke get on tape?.

I think this Justice Dept investigation/Abramoff deal is going to be huge with many ending up in chromium bracelets, best to get the hell out of the way....

110 posted on 01/07/2006 10:01:10 AM PST by taildragger (They call them selves Liberal Democrats, I call them Collaborators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Gipper08

The dims are starting to talk about Pelosi not being what they need right now and would like to possibly replace her. Do you think she'll 'step-down' for the good of her party or tell them all to shut the hell up, she isn't going anywhere.


111 posted on 01/07/2006 10:01:16 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Gipper08

THIS SUCKS!!


112 posted on 01/07/2006 10:01:17 AM PST by conservative barking moonbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision

For every action, there is a reaction. Delay's leadership has been strong and tough, and has earned him many enemies, even with conservatives inside his own caucus.

Blunt will be an excellent majority leader, and has very close personal ties with GWB; much closer than Delay does.

Does anyone know the date of the State of the Union address? I cannot find it; usually it's the last Tuesday in January? Thanks


113 posted on 01/07/2006 10:01:45 AM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
How about voting his principles as a small-government conservative 100% of the time?

Does the man ever get anything done? Damn, don't you think Delay would if that stance would always work? Wake up
114 posted on 01/07/2006 10:02:15 AM PST by Vision (“We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the duty of intelligent men")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

"It will probably be Tancredo who calls for him to resign just like he did almost a year ago."

I've explained this to you and Dane 1000x, you open-borders troll.

Delay has been a major obstructionist on border security.

One year ago, Sensenbrenner and 117 or so other Congressment held up the Homeland Security bill because Delay wouldn't attach BORDER SECURITY provisions. He said they would address it in the new year... Well, guess what happened.

Delay lied to secure votes for a pork-ridden bill that didn't include border security as a part of homeland security.

He also said there was no fat left to trim from the budget - another lie.

Yeah, he can get bills passed - big pork bills, by lying.


115 posted on 01/07/2006 10:02:30 AM PST by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

You are right on


116 posted on 01/07/2006 10:02:37 AM PST by Gipper08 (Mike Pence in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: adam_az


"I've explained this to you and Dane 1000x, you open-borders troll."

LOL!


117 posted on 01/07/2006 10:03:08 AM PST by Gipper08 (Mike Pence in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
If it's "crotchety" to hold lying professional politicians and a party that does nothing but grow government and cares about nothing but reelection to account, then yeah - I guess I'm getting crotchety.

Crotchety bump!...and I'm a curmudgeon to boot!

"Crotchety Cuurmudgeons Unite!"

FMCDH(BITS)...I have little faith in any of our elected officials...

118 posted on 01/07/2006 10:03:29 AM PST by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
It mentions House leadership, which was Delay. I remember the threads from a year ago. I couldn't find any of them and didn't want to spend a half hour looking. If you care, you look 'em up. My memory is accurate.

Your link simply says "leadership". It offers no named sources. It also says that leadership wanted to reform our nation's intelligence agencies as soon as possible. It didn't say that leadership didn't want immigration reform.

There's a logical difference.

If you wish to make a point, you should demonstrate it. Else you haven't made a point.

119 posted on 01/07/2006 10:03:42 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Vision

"Damn, don't you think Delay would if that stance would always work?"

NO


120 posted on 01/07/2006 10:03:57 AM PST by Gipper08 (Mike Pence in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 541-549 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson