Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Family Stone
Townhall.com ^ | 12/21/2005 | Megan Basham

Posted on 12/21/2005 8:37:47 AM PST by moviewatcher

Pot-smoking, gay adoption, and mothers gleefully discussing how their daughters lost their virginity. Ahh, just what the Christmas season is all about. What? Not in your family?

Then you must not work in the film industry. Because apparently there, like doorbells and sleighbells and schnitzel with noodle, these things add up to a heartwarming holiday.

The Family Stone is yet another case of movie marketing bait-and-switch. Playing on Christmas nostalgia, which most Americans share, the trailer promised a rollicking, good-natured comedy about family foibles and the frustrating moments that eventually become our favorite memories.

What the film delivers is a ham-fisted primer on blue-state values.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: familystone; hollyweird; hollywood; moralabsolutes; moviereview; movies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-191 next last
To: Borges

I do read about movies. I just rarely waste my money on them.


81 posted on 12/21/2005 10:07:02 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: moviewatcher

Do you think the Hollywood elites will get a clue soon?
I think I'll treat myself to some classic movie dvds this year. I love the old black and whites! You know, the ones where actors actually had talent and didn't have to rely on special effects and shock value to sell a movie. I won't be wasting my money at the theater anymore.


82 posted on 12/21/2005 10:07:09 AM PST by derllak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

You aren't missing anything since Hollywood has little to offer except redone movies. Not much original. Lots of violence, profanity, nudity, mix well and charge $8 a pop.


83 posted on 12/21/2005 10:08:42 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: MattinNJ
See "March of the penguins"-amazing flick. The penguins treat their young better and sacrifice more for them than most parents I know.

Only movie I saw in the theater this year. Morgan Freeman was perfect as the narrator.

84 posted on 12/21/2005 10:09:09 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: moviewatcher

I think I'll check it out. From the review it sounds as if Blue State 'values' are being viciously satirized and held up to ridicule. I'd agree that promoting it as a feel-good Christmas movie is probably wrong. Unlike many FReepers I understand -- and greatly appreciate -- deft satire.


85 posted on 12/21/2005 10:15:27 AM PST by Bernard Marx (Don't make the mistake of interpreting my Civility as Servility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

"I wonder what audience they had in mind. Certainly not Everyday People..."

Good one! We gotta relay going...

Even though I started it, still, I am no better and neither are you...


86 posted on 12/21/2005 10:19:18 AM PST by fizziwig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: moviewatcher
Wow, glad I found out what this stinker was about. Mrs. PogySailor was hinting at wanting to see it. Knowing that Diane Keaton and Sara Jessica Parker are grade A moonbats should have been enough to wave her off, but this will surely open her eyes.
87 posted on 12/21/2005 10:25:28 AM PST by PogySailor (Semper Fi to the 3/1 H&S Company in Haditha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exile

The many closeups of Jessica were horrible to see. Put a witch hat on her head and move the mole to her sharp chin. Now that would be perfect casting for a horror movie.


88 posted on 12/21/2005 10:29:19 AM PST by hdstmf (too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: moviewatcher

I just checked Rotten Tomatoes.com for it's review-based rating of "The Family Stone"

56%

RT's standard is that anything under 65% is considered rotten.

I hadn't planned on seeing it anyway. It's nice to know that my opinion is re-inforced.

Jack.


89 posted on 12/21/2005 10:29:55 AM PST by Jack Deth (Knight Errant and Disemboweler of the WFTD Thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x

Guess Who's Coming to Dinner? was high drama about liberal intolerance. But even if it exposed a little hypocracy, it's the hypocritical liberals that are the heros.


90 posted on 12/21/2005 10:31:25 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: moviewatcher

You have made the right choice in not seeing the movie. You save money AND avoid contributing to a deceptive piece of crap.


91 posted on 12/21/2005 10:33:21 AM PST by hdstmf (too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior
Hollywood has been making this same movie over and over lately. The only thing missing is Ben Stiller.

Ding! Ding! Ding!

92 posted on 12/21/2005 10:34:48 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

They also portrayed the only one to question gay adoption as a bumbling fool.


93 posted on 12/21/2005 10:36:38 AM PST by hdstmf (too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: moviewatcher

Thanks for the heads-up. Hollyweird regulators apparently insist that every film now have a gay-promotion subplot. I'll save my $7.50 on this one.


94 posted on 12/21/2005 10:38:26 AM PST by Albion Wilde ((America will not run, and we will not forget our responsibilities. – George W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x

I did see it with the expectation of a holiday comedy. I was really pissed at the blatant homosexual plot.


95 posted on 12/21/2005 10:42:41 AM PST by hdstmf (too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: massadvj

There was another sneaky scene that apparently was used to generate sympathy for masectomy victims. Keaton and Nelson are having a tender moment in bed when she pulled her top open. She pulled his hand over the vivid scar. It had nothing to do with anything about the movie.


96 posted on 12/21/2005 10:51:11 AM PST by hdstmf (too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: x

It is not a deep movie. It is simply gay bs.


97 posted on 12/21/2005 10:53:21 AM PST by hdstmf (too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

Me too. I was totally sandbagged.


98 posted on 12/21/2005 10:58:44 AM PST by hdstmf (too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: moviewatcher

It's been done before with Home For The Holidays
http://imdb.com/title/tt0113321/?fr=c2l0ZT1kZnx0dD0xfGZiPXV8cG49MHxrdz0xfHE9SG9tZSBGb3IgdGhlIEhvbGlkYXlzfGZ0PTF8bXg9MjB8bG09NTAwfGNvPTF8aHRtbD0xfG5tPTE_;fc=1;ft=20;fm=1

MPAA: Rated PG-13 for thematic material, language and brief drug use.

Trivia: Robert Downey Jr. publicly admitted to using drugs during the making of this film, and to having great difficulty filming his scenes. Jodie Foster tried to intervene but could not.

Interestingly, at the start of the movie Holly Hunter (playing Claudia) is showering. Robert Downing Jr (playing the part of brother) takes pictures of her naked, then runs to his mom and says, "Mom, Claudia is flashing me..." Of course, the viewer is not aware that Robert Downing Jr's character is a flaming drug-addicted homosexual. So, your left watching what appears to be a brief but graphic incestous encounter. The movie earned a nomination at the GLAAD media awards for best film.

The movie was a DElight. Pure joy/ sarc


99 posted on 12/21/2005 11:01:20 AM PST by sully777 (What Would Brian Boitano Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: derllak
"Do you think the Hollywood elites will get a clue soon?"

No. I don't think they will get it any time soon. They are way too arrogant and proud to even consider that they may be wrong. In a sense, I think this is a good thing. Perhaps this will drive more people to read instead of just watching the tube or screen. Hollywood is going to drive themselves into poverty and obscurity. I cannot help but to cheer it on; for it could not happen to a more deserving bunch of creeps.

"I think I'll treat myself to some classic movie dvds this year. I love the old black and whites! You know, the ones where actors actually had talent and didn't have to rely on special effects and shock value to sell a movie."

Those are about the only movies that I watch anymore. I have always been a stickler for historical accuracy in films. I used to make fun of the gladiator movies from the 50's in which all of the gladiators had crew cuts. But as time has passed and as I've gotten a little older, I look at those movies now as really good. The acting I think was better, along with the directing, and along with the script. Some of the latest movies that are "technically correct" (in so much as they don't wear costumes with zippers, etc.), just stink in every other way.

Whatever happened to dialog? Have you noticed that the same lines get used over and over again until it just numbs your mind. Examples "Don't die on me now, (fill in the name)." "Who duh man!" "It's more (fill in the blank) than you can possibly imagine." "You can't kill me... I'm already dead!" and on and on. My God, I think I just typed up the main plot outline for a Hollywood quality script.

"I won't be wasting my money at the theater anymore."

I intend to go to the Narnia movie soon, but after that, I have no desire.
100 posted on 12/21/2005 11:05:02 AM PST by dbehsman (NRA Life member and loving every minute of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson