Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Aussies develop rifle with no recoil : ) bring back the .308
The Australian ^ | December 09, 2005 | John Kerin

Posted on 12/11/2005 9:13:46 PM PST by Flavius

John Kerin December 09, 2005

AN Australian company has developed a "recoil-less" rifle that overcomes the centuries-old danger of kickback.

The breakthrough could lead to the development of a new generation of lightweight weapons - from pistols, rifles and heavy artillery - that are faster, more powerful and more efficient and accurate.

Richard Giza, executive chairman of Melbourne-based Recoilless Technologies International, said last night the recoil or kickback of a gun had always been a big drawback, not only making a weapon more cumbersome but also more dangerous.

Australian defence scientists are understood to be keenly interested in the new technology, which could be used by the Australian Defence Force and lead to lucrative exports to Australia's allies.

Although details of the new technology remain top secret, the new rifle barrel "splits" dissipating energy in both directions rather than just backwards, as is the case in existing guns.

Mr Giza said it was expected the technology could be applied to a range of ballistic weapons, including pistols, rifles, field artillery and naval guns.

"This provides a cost-effective and practical way of eliminating recoil for the first time," Mr Giza said.

"The potential is not limited to ballistic weapons ... it's also hoped it can be applied to high-powered industrial tools (such as nail-guns), making manufacturing, construction and engineering much safer."

Ross Babbage, a leading defence expert who has seen the rifle in action, said the technology had the potential to make "many weapons more accurate, lighter, faster and far more effective in the field".

"It shows that relatively simple, practical and lightweight adaptations to conventional weapons designs can remove recoil completely," he said.

"It also promises to make operating weapons and industrial tools far safer ... eliminating injuries traditionally associated with recoil.

"It represents a revolutionary breakthrough that should provide Australia and its closest allies with a considerable advantage on the battlefield."

Professor Babbage said a prototype rifle had been tested in Melbourne but the technology was being kept under wraps.

Adam Vella, Commonwealth and Olympic Games shooting medallist and director of Recoilless Technologies International, will talk about the impact of recoilless guns on competition shooting at the Frankston-Australian Gun Club in Melbourne on Monday.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arms; bang; banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2005 9:13:47 PM PST by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flavius
"Although details of the new technology remain top secret, the new rifle barrel "splits" dissipating energy in both directions rather than just backwards, as is the case in existing guns."

Gee, why didn't someone think of this already?


2 posted on 12/11/2005 9:18:44 PM PST by flashbunny (To err is human. But to really screw something up, have the government try to fix it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Great!! Right before we ban all weapons, let's improve them.


3 posted on 12/11/2005 9:19:33 PM PST by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I looked in my rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

er this sounds like this other australian technology called metal storm.


4 posted on 12/11/2005 9:21:14 PM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

That'll clear a firing line!


5 posted on 12/11/2005 9:26:30 PM PST by claudiustg (Go Bush! Go Sharon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Wow! Patent that puppy! Why didn't anybody think of it before?


6 posted on 12/11/2005 9:27:41 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I'm thinking of calling it a "muzzle brake".


7 posted on 12/11/2005 9:28:54 PM PST by flashbunny (To err is human. But to really screw something up, have the government try to fix it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

I wonder what their gimmick really is? It can't possibly just be a brake.


8 posted on 12/11/2005 9:32:14 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

not sure - but the way they talk about it working with industrial tools as well makes me wonder exactly what they're using to manage the recoil.


9 posted on 12/11/2005 9:35:08 PM PST by flashbunny (To err is human. But to really screw something up, have the government try to fix it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Click here for an example of recoil
10 posted on 12/11/2005 9:37:04 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Come on--the recoil is the fun part!


11 posted on 12/11/2005 9:38:26 PM PST by midnightson (Mama-the ultimate prognosticator- said there'd be days like this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
I wonder what their gimmick really is? It can't possibly just be a brake.

Gas redirection of some sort. Any system that bleeds gas will reduce velocity.

12 posted on 12/11/2005 9:40:01 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
I hate to say this, but if you want to get a comfortable .308 rifle, just take an M14 (or M-1A) and replace the metal butt-plate with a rubber one. My Fed Ord M-14 came standard with it on the fiberglass stock, and it's like shooting a really big .22! Practicly no kick whatsoever. A bit of muzzle rise, but that's to be expected. NRA high power rapid fire courses are no problem at all.

Mark

13 posted on 12/11/2005 9:41:04 PM PST by MarkL (I swear by my pretty floral bonnet that I will end you! (I just saw "Safe" again last night!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
"Ya cannot change the laws of physics!"
14 posted on 12/11/2005 9:44:54 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

What's "dangerous" about recoil? A person only lets that scope smack 'em upside the head once(Well, a smart person learns "eye relief" after the first time). Can you say "magnum eye"?


15 posted on 12/11/2005 9:45:52 PM PST by chadwimc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

bump


16 posted on 12/11/2005 9:53:06 PM PST by Enterprise (The modern Democrat Party - a toxic stew of mental illness, cultism, and organized crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: midnightson

Up to a point...


17 posted on 12/11/2005 9:55:08 PM PST by Atchafalaya (When you're there, that's the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: midnightson

Up to a point...


18 posted on 12/11/2005 10:01:01 PM PST by Atchafalaya (When you're there, that's the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
"...the new rifle barrel "splits" dissipating energy in both directions rather than just backwards...."

Generally, all barrels are retired after they "split."

They ain't too accurate after they split!

ROTFLMAO!!!

19 posted on 12/11/2005 10:05:49 PM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chadwimc
What's "dangerous" about recoil? A person only lets that scope smack 'em upside the head once(Well, a smart person learns "eye relief" after the first time). Can you say "magnum eye"?

I don't think it's dangerous either, but I will say that for people without a history of shooting, firing a hard recoiling rifle will help them develop a flinch. I've shot M-14s with the standard steel butt-plates, and after a few hundred rounds, your shoulder begins to get sore. That's not the case with my Fed Ord.

Mark

20 posted on 12/11/2005 10:05:53 PM PST by MarkL (I swear by my pretty floral bonnet that I will end you! (I just saw "Safe" again last night!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson