Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Focus on the Family Severs Ties with Wells Fargo (bank advances radical homosexual agenda)
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY ^ | December 1, 2005

Posted on 12/05/2005 4:54:18 AM PST by Liz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: joesbucks

FOTF went with the First National Bank of Omaha.


41 posted on 12/05/2005 7:42:09 AM PST by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Here's some more information about the First National Bank of Omaha that I retrieved off of our intranet (I'm a FOTF employee):

"Outsourcing certain functions makes sense for FOF, as addressed in the previous the FOF Outsourcing Philosophy. The basic reasons are to provide the best possible service to Focus constituents, while honoring our stewardship responsibilities. Two of the vendors who can handle our business transactions at a significant cost savings are Patni and First National Bank of Omaha (FNBO).

...

"First National Bank of Omaha has been a banking partner with FOF for over 10 years. We decided to outsource to FNBO since they could more efficiently integrate simple transaction processing, imaging, and coding into our existing banking system. In the process, we were also able to eliminate the problem of a production bottleneck and avoid additional captial expenditures for equipment. Although this shift of production eliminated jobs within the FOF Colorado Springs operation, customer service was improved, costs were reduced, and FOF staff were able to maintain their focus on the ministry needs of our constituents."


42 posted on 12/05/2005 7:47:51 AM PST by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

As part of your argument that FOTF was doing this just for the publicity you used an absolute standard, which is the tool of those who know they don't have a leg to stand on otherwise.

You used the standard that the new institution must not have ANY connections to those things that FOTF is opposed to, homsexuality, abortion, etc. I think I'm on safe grounds when I say that no such institution exists anywhere on this side of the after-life. However, I'm confident that the new institution they went with is reasonably close to meeting that standard.

Most of us know that, and accept that fact that in going about our daily business we need to interact with those who have different standards than we do, sometimes opposing standards.

Your posts thus far on this subject have indicated an all or nothing approach.


43 posted on 12/05/2005 7:49:39 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SolutionsOnly
"Where will I take my business?"

I think they (Focus on the Family) moved to National Bank of Omaha or something like that - it's a Christian owned and operatd bank. :-)

44 posted on 12/05/2005 7:53:12 AM PST by arizonarachel ("Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for men," Col 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Thanks Liz,I have written and will send this email address out to others..


45 posted on 12/05/2005 7:54:38 AM PST by Beth528
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: crghill
Being that 2/3rds of the wealth of the U.S. is controlled by Evangelical Christians

Where does that number come from? I think our modern culture would look a lot different if this was true. For example, I wouldn't have to consider the following to be a subversive statement:


46 posted on 12/05/2005 8:01:36 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (Have you visited http://c-pol.blogspot.com?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

I wound up leaving Wells Fargo in 2002 due to service lapses. Repeated failures to update address records after a move was the specific problem. Yes, I knew of WF's pro-gay inclinations at the time, and based on my experience as a customer with other corporations, when corporations get sidetracked with appeasing leftist pressure groups, service suffers. Maybe it wakes up, more often it doesn't, and crashes. Same is happening with Washington Mutual (which acquired Bank United in 2000, a bank known for excellent service), same happened with AT&T (not referring to the entity currently called AT&T, which is really an enlarged Southwestern Bell that devoured the original AT&T).


47 posted on 12/05/2005 8:03:51 AM PST by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Yes I was using an absolute standards. Remember, we are to deal in absolutes.

Now from Theo's reply in #42, he notes from being a Focus on the Family employee:

"Outsourcing certain functions makes sense for FOF, as addressed in the previous the FOF Outsourcing Philosophy. The basic reasons are to provide the best possible service to Focus constituents, while honoring our stewardship responsibilities.

Two of the vendors who can handle our business transactions at a significant cost savings are Patni and First National Bank of Omaha (FNBO).

... "First National Bank of Omaha has been a banking partner with FOF for over 10 years. We decided to outsource to FNBO since they could more efficiently integrate simple transaction processing, imaging, and coding into our existing banking system. In the process, we were also able to eliminate the problem of a production bottleneck and avoid additional captial expenditures for equipment. Although this shift of production eliminated jobs within the FOF Colorado Springs operation, customer service was improved, costs were reduced, and FOF staff were able to maintain their focus on the ministry needs of our constituents."

I think I was the one who said cost savings in some shape or form was really the reason behind this. There was no mention in the press release of the cost savings or the jobs lost.

48 posted on 12/05/2005 8:05:00 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

There are several FOTF memos relating to Wells Fargo and the First National Bank of Omaha. Other internal memos do point out how Wells Fargo is simply an organization we don't want to deal with because of their radical homosexual agenda.

Cost savings is not "really the reason behind this" as you put it. There are a number of factors, but the primary reason for severing from Wells Fargo is indeed that organization's immoral stances. We just don't want to be part of such a messed up banking institution, and we can take our finances elsewhere.

No need to be so suspicious of FOTF's motives. :-)


49 posted on 12/05/2005 8:23:44 AM PST by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
What is your point for repeatedly posting your theories?

It appears people are not swayed by your attempted disparaging of FOF's motives -give it a rest already or some may think you are simply a homosexual activist.

50 posted on 12/05/2005 8:27:43 AM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Liz

"Talking the talk and walking the walk" bump


51 posted on 12/05/2005 8:36:14 AM PST by apackof2 (You can stand me up at the gates of hell, but I won’t back down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theo

thank you for the info.


52 posted on 12/05/2005 8:42:07 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Wells Fargo is making dollar for dollar contributions to GLAAD's political wing which focuses on fighting FOTF activities.

I doubt ALL other banks are doing likewise. FOTF dumped Wells Fargo for the above activity, not because it has a diversity statement.


53 posted on 12/05/2005 8:51:01 AM PST by Valpal1 (Crush jihadists, drive collaborators before you, hear the lamentations of their media. Allahu FUBAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
What is your point for repeatedly posting your theories? some may think you are simply a homosexual activist.So, the fact that they changed banking companies to get better service, but they write a PR piece claiming it was due to their exisiting banking companies support of an agenda they disagree with. But in the same piece, they basically said they probably couldn't achieve, with regard to agendas, a total withhold all of our business posture due to it being would be next to impossible. They essentially are spitting in the wind. And the nice little secret they didn't tell the public is they used some best practices to find a company that can do what they need, at a better cost and helps FOTF to reduce headcount. Wonder why?

As for being an activist, I'm not. As for being pro agenda, I am not. As for organizations that are to be setting the standards of truth and accountability, then yes, I have an agenda.

54 posted on 12/05/2005 8:55:26 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
This is a leading reason why the changed.

"Outsourcing certain functions makes sense for FOF, as addressed in the previous the FOF Outsourcing Philosophy. The basic reasons are to provide the best possible service to Focus constituents, while honoring our stewardship responsibilities. Two of the vendors who can handle our business transactions at a significant cost savings are Patni and First National Bank of Omaha (FNBO). ... "First National Bank of Omaha has been a banking partner with FOF for over 10 years. We decided to outsource to FNBO since they could more efficiently integrate simple transaction processing, imaging, and coding into our existing banking system. In the process, we were also able to eliminate the problem of a production bottleneck and avoid additional captial expenditures for equipment. Although this shift of production eliminated jobs within the FOF Colorado Springs operation, customer service was improved, costs were reduced, and FOF staff were able to maintain their focus on the ministry needs of our constituents."

55 posted on 12/05/2005 8:56:30 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

I heard this given in a speech by a investment professional in 2002. He went on to say that 42% of all mutual funds are held by people who define themselves as Christian. I do not know the source of his data and as such, probably shouldn't have quoted it.


56 posted on 12/05/2005 9:19:53 AM PST by crghill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: crghill
I could accept the notion that self-identified Christians control two thirds of the nation's wealth. However, that statistic doesn't mean much, because few self-identified Christians actually run important life decisions through the filter of their supposed worldview.
57 posted on 12/05/2005 9:26:02 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (Have you visited http://c-pol.blogspot.com?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: WKB

ping...


58 posted on 12/05/2005 9:28:14 AM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping List Freepmail me if you want on or off this ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB

ping...


59 posted on 12/05/2005 9:29:12 AM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping List Freepmail me if you want on or off this ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

You thank me for providing you helpful information, and then in your next two posts continue to trash Focus on the Family? I'm trying to help bring some background to FOTF's prior relationship with the Bank of Omaha, and you intentially miscontrue that to mean that FOTF is all about money and not about principle? You are one jaded man to assume that FOTF is deceptive and hiding its "true" motives.

My providing additional information should indicate to you that FOTF and its employees have a culture of transparency and honesty, not deception.

Once and for all, FOTF severed its relationship with Wells Fargo because of their support of the homosexual agenda. And FOTF chose to go with Bank of Omaha for variety of reasons, including that doing so would better serve our constituents.

You need to consider *your* motives for being so accusatory against a fine organization that's trying to do the right thing.


60 posted on 12/05/2005 9:34:22 AM PST by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson