Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missile Attack On Passenger Jet?
Radio News | November 28, 2005

Posted on 11/28/2005 4:49:25 AM PST by texianyankee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 881-882 next last
To: peyton randolph

Get them in tiajunna


221 posted on 11/28/2005 2:36:46 PM PST by al baby (Father of the beeber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: From One - Many

Almost 6PM and nothing new on this...

Clarification of time and date and airline seem a strange series of LACK OF FACTS...weird!


222 posted on 11/28/2005 2:38:32 PM PST by 3D-JOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

bookmark


223 posted on 11/28/2005 2:48:55 PM PST by Oorang ( A great deal of talent is lost to the world for want of a little courage. -Goethe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
"It was also the first time I recognized that the government will lie to us, outright, with their teeth in their mouth and their faces hanging out."

That was a bad moment for me too, but it was a better moment when I realized that even with all their resources, the government was just too freakin' inept to pull off the kinds of black helicopter fantasies that the tin-foil hat crowd were spinning constantly, at least to pull them off and get away with it on any widespread basis.

224 posted on 11/28/2005 2:52:41 PM PST by Great Caesars Ghost (Who says we're going to win the War On Terror? We can still lose this war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
There is also nothing on Landings.com or Airliners.net

Or on PPrune.com, AirDisaster.com, or Jetphotos.net which leads me to believe this story is untrue. It would been out there for sure on at least one of these sites if not more.

225 posted on 11/28/2005 3:00:04 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (If Tom Tancredo is on the GOP ticket in 2008, We Will Have Another President Clinton in 2009.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Go_Raiders

When I first heard of the plane hitting the first tower, I thought it was an accident. My reasons for this were that it had rained in Ohio the day before, plus the Yanks game was rained out the night before. Without seeing the weather in New York, I jumped to the erroneous conclusion. I also thought it was a smaller plane since a commercial craft would not come close to flying low enough to hitting the WTC, even in horrible weather. Naturally, the second I turned on the TV, and saw it was a sunny day there, I knew what really happened.


226 posted on 11/28/2005 3:05:49 PM PST by GoBucks2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: somemoreequalthanothers

They would have been in violation of every rule in the book to be flying below 1000 feet any where near Manhattan. Indeed, only a complete dufus would have thought that even the first plane was not terrorism.


227 posted on 11/28/2005 3:34:30 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Southack

"One of our military aircraft accidentally flew into the Empire State building during WW2, killing several people."

Ummm, still not control failure.

Saturday morning, July 28th, 1945, found New York City bathed in a thick fog. Visibility on the ground was bad enough, but up in the air that morning was Lt. Colonel William Smith, piloting a B-25 bomber over the city toward Newark where he was to pick up his commanding officer. The fog he found himself in was more like soup. For reasons that have never been adequately explained, Smith wound up over Municipal Airport (which is now LaGuardia) and asked the tower for a weather report. The controller instructed Smith to land, but the pilot made a serious blunder by insisting for clearance to continue to Newark. Municipal reluctantly gave the clearance, but the controller, still hoping to convince Smith of the seriousness of the situation, tried one more time, saying these final words to Smith: "From where I'm sitting, I can't see the top of the Empire State Building."

Regulations in Manhattan require all aircraft to fly no lower than 2,000 feet. Smith committed another blunder when he dropped under 1,000 feet to get out of the thickest part of the fog and take a peek at the ground, hoping to get his bearings straight. What he found was a forest of skyscrapers, the tops of which were all around him.

Skyscrapers do not get hit by accident by aircraft in clear weather. The pilot has too much control over the variables, and the odds of a Flight 800 type explosion or midair collision resulting in an impact on a skyscraper is not much greater than a meteor strike on a skyscraper.


228 posted on 11/28/2005 3:39:20 PM PST by Go_Raiders ("Being able to catch well in a crowd just means you can't get open, that's all." -- James Lofton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Jigsaw John

If something was shot into the air, it would have had to be from a boat. In the good weather (westerly) take off direction from LAX there is nothing out there but water. Catalina is SW from LAX and Santa Barbara Island (a restricted Navy range) is WNW from it and further out than 15NM.


229 posted on 11/28/2005 3:41:32 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

But a totally illegal, tweaked Estes (with Soviet style multiple parallel motors) might be able to eke out something over 5K ...


230 posted on 11/28/2005 3:43:31 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: GoBucks2002

"Naturally, the second I turned on the TV, and saw it was a sunny day there, I knew what really happened."

Exactly. It was the clear, sunny day that was the instant refutation of pilot error or control failure, not the second plane. Thick clouds and rain would have saved the WTC.


231 posted on 11/28/2005 3:44:23 PM PST by Go_Raiders ("Being able to catch well in a crowd just means you can't get open, that's all." -- James Lofton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant
Where's Pierre Salinger when you need him?
Last time I looked, Salinger and Francisco Franco were both still dead.
232 posted on 11/28/2005 3:45:17 PM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Go_Raiders
"Skyscrapers do not get hit by accident by aircraft in clear weather."

I've seen drunk pilots. I've seen pilots have a heart attack while flying. I've seen pilots suffer control loss. I've seen pilots suffer from spacial disorientation. I've seen pilots clip aircraft hangars. I've seen pilots run out of fuel. I've seen pilots stall. I've seen pilots fly straight into the ground. I've seen pilots fight each other in the cockpit (fisticuffs). I've seen pilots "show off" and wind up making a serious mistake.

The Empire State building had already been hit by accident there in NYC some half century earlier, so it wasn't until the second aircraft that it was *confirmed* that the first WTC impact was terrorism.

233 posted on 11/28/2005 4:11:42 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

oh dear, not again


234 posted on 11/28/2005 4:24:22 PM PST by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee
Those local yocals on the radio station in the morning are a bunch of idiots! I betcha they think LAX is a laxative.

Sheesh... aggies.

235 posted on 11/28/2005 4:36:50 PM PST by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Southack
I remember thinking after the first plane it that it was probably an accident. I mean, who would have thought those crazy bastards would fly a plane into a building?

They had always been all about hijacking and trading passengers to get some comrade released or a ransom. They did bomb airplanes they weren't on. And they'd threaten to blow things up if it didn't got their way during a hijacking, maybe even do it, but usually they'd just kill some passengers.

But fly into a building? No way. Very few people saw that coming. Not until the second plane hit did I know for sure what was going on.

236 posted on 11/28/2005 5:01:46 PM PST by GBA (I believe Congressman Weldon! MSM do your job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

Yep, that's basically what I said.


237 posted on 11/28/2005 5:29:01 PM PST by Jigsaw John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Borax Queen

The FBI/CIA/FCC/ABC channels should really thing about hiring out Baghdad Bob


238 posted on 11/28/2005 5:32:31 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: GBA
The system developed by the FAA and industry passes compressed air through a membrane that separates nitrogen and pumps it into the tanks, preventing combustion.

*ahem* Parker Hanifin developed this system in the late 70's. The FAA was NOT interested.

239 posted on 11/28/2005 5:38:40 PM PST by null and void (Peace on Earth. Death to the Terrorists...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: FarmerW
The only reason I can come up with is they fear the backlash while at first against Bush and Homeland Security, would ultimately keep Republicans in office as no one wants a Dem during the war.

Because Bush says the reason we are in Iraq is terrorism. Since *obviously* He lied, there must be no terrorism. Recognizing any terrorist act would put the MSM in the position of validating something Dubya has been saying.

This is clearly unacceptable!

240 posted on 11/28/2005 5:44:22 PM PST by null and void (Peace on Earth. Death to the Terrorists...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 881-882 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson