To: Red Badger
False neutrals are common on many motorcycles.
2 posted on
11/23/2005 12:40:21 PM PST by
battlecry
To: Red Badger
The defect may allow the motorcycles to go into a false neutral position even though the neutral indicator light is illuminated, it said. NINO? Neutral In Name Only?
3 posted on
11/23/2005 12:41:09 PM PST by
steveo
(Stewpot - There is absolutely nothing like the frame of a dame...)
To: Red Badger
Not surprising from a company that sells more t-shirts and genuine Harley induced crap than they do bikes.
4 posted on
11/23/2005 12:42:04 PM PST by
HOTTIEBOY
(Maybe in your house. Not in mine.)
To: Red Badger
False Neutral = In Gear (but the light is on)
5 posted on
11/23/2005 12:42:33 PM PST by
Disambiguator
(Making accusations of racism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.)
To: Red Badger
What they did not the the right number of oil (5+)leaks?
6 posted on
11/23/2005 12:44:00 PM PST by
TXBSAFH
("I would rather be a free man in my grave then living as a puppet or a slave." - Jimmy Cliff)
To: Red Badger
13 posted on
11/23/2005 12:48:06 PM PST by
rellimpank
(Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media:NRABenefactor)
To: Red Badger
buy a harley get the best ride a mile and walk the rest. :-)
17 posted on
11/23/2005 12:52:08 PM PST by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: Red Badger
Funny that Baker et al have been doing six speed boxes for a while that HD gets caught this way. Anyone know if the Motor Company builds the boxes themselfs or who they buy 'em from?
20 posted on
11/23/2005 12:54:14 PM PST by
pikachu
(That which does not kill me just makes me grumpy!)
To: Red Badger
22 posted on
11/23/2005 12:54:37 PM PST by
Yo-Yo
To: Red Badger
Q: What's the difference between a Harley and a Hoover?
A: On the Hoover, the dirt bag is below the body!
27 posted on
11/23/2005 1:00:10 PM PST by
JAWs
To: Red Badger
37 posted on
11/23/2005 1:20:12 PM PST by
rintense
To: Red Badger
I knew there was a reason I got rid of that stock a few months back.
39 posted on
11/23/2005 1:21:34 PM PST by
RichardW
To: Red Badger
The Harley haters are out in force.
You sound like a bunch of whiney Democrats. A good company that makes a good product is doing well and you just can't stand it.
I'll bet you hate WalMart too. Typical.
45 posted on
11/23/2005 1:26:40 PM PST by
Poser
(Willing to fight for oil)
To: Red Badger
What's wrong? They weren't loud enough?
46 posted on
11/23/2005 1:26:54 PM PST by
VRing
To: Red Badger
All the boneheads bashing Harley's, are ignorant of two things.
First, Harley-Davidson motorcycles are just as reliable as anything else these days, and are just having a hard time living down the old AMF days. I know, I've got an 04 XL1200 that has over 15000 miles, gets 50-70mpg and not a lick of trouble yet.
Second, and most important, bikers are by far CONSERVATIVE!
To: Red Badger
"If that happens, the transmission could engage into first or second gear unexpectedly," Harley-Davidson spokesman Bob Klein said Wednesday."
It sounds like they should go back to the old suicide shifter on the side of the tank, like they had in the mid 40's/ sarc.
169 posted on
11/25/2005 8:48:31 AM PST by
Beagle8U
(An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
To: Red Badger
Is this the first recall? I rode Harleys from 1970 – about 1998. Never saw a recall – or had a problem.
More Jap Crap propaganda?
294 posted on
11/25/2005 11:15:12 AM PST by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
