Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Do you suppose this is the start of a trend? I hope so.

And before we know it, maybe the US Supreme Court will declare the income tax unconstitutional. Well, I can dream, can't I?

1 posted on 11/22/2005 8:20:12 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: ancient_geezer

This is not exactly income tax ping, but it's an encouraging event.


2 posted on 11/22/2005 8:21:06 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

They will find another way to continue the educrat mafia. After-all there are Unions to appease and little minds to indoctrinate!


6 posted on 11/22/2005 8:26:52 PM PST by Nateman (State indoctrination on your nickel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

for later


7 posted on 11/22/2005 8:28:32 PM PST by satchmodog9 ( Seventy million spent on the lefts Christmas present and all they got was a Scooter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

I hate to burst your bubble, but the same thing happened in New Hampshire and Vermont. You don't save any money; new state-wide taxes are created. You end up with "donor towns" and "recipient towns". And the litigation is endless.


8 posted on 11/22/2005 8:28:46 PM PST by LibFreeOrDie (L'chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
The Supreme Court agreed with the plaintiffs' argument that the system is unconstitutional because so many school districts are forced to tax property owners at the maximum limit of $1.50 per $100 in property value

Heck I just looked at my Spring ISD tax bill and I am taxed at 1.95 per hundred. I would like to know where that 1.5 per hundred listed in the article comes from.

11 posted on 11/22/2005 8:36:48 PM PST by Texasforever (France out of the West Bank ................of Paris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

They'd have to repeal the 16th Amendment for that to happen.


14 posted on 11/22/2005 8:38:11 PM PST by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

State constitution prohibits the state from taxing property......a good thing.


18 posted on 11/22/2005 8:46:13 PM PST by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
The court declined to offer its own solution, pushing the issue back to lawmakers.

How refreshing.

But yowsers is this gonna send things into a tizzy. And when the taxation dust settles I'd wager folks is gonna wind up payin more......
28 posted on 11/22/2005 9:09:57 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
The court declined to offer its own solution, pushing the issue back to lawmakers.

Most Excellent !

35 posted on 11/22/2005 9:35:57 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
And before we know it, maybe the US Supreme Court will declare the income tax unconstitutional. Well, I can dream, can't I?

Actually you can't even dream it. The Supreme Court can find LEGISLATION unconstitutional, but it can't find the constitution itself unconstitutional. The income tax comes to us via constitutional amendment which themselves become part of the constitution itself.

43 posted on 11/22/2005 11:15:10 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Do you suppose this is the start of a trend?

Let's pray.

48 posted on 11/23/2005 12:30:06 AM PST by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
[T]o compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical.
-- Thomas Jefferson


49 posted on 11/23/2005 12:51:59 AM PST by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

Cool. Only those who utilize government education should be forced to pay for it. We homeschool- I would LOVE to see Florida follow this logic.


52 posted on 11/23/2005 3:37:38 AM PST by ovrtaxt (Does this suicide belt make my butt look big?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

I'm not so sure this is a good trend. This is specifically designed to take control of schools out of the hands of local people.

I'd be glad to fund schools with a local sales tax, because that, too, would be under local control.


59 posted on 11/23/2005 4:32:32 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dd5339

ping!


61 posted on 11/23/2005 5:05:12 AM PST by Vic3O3 (Jeremiah 31:16-17 (KJV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
This ruling by the Texas Supreme Court is welcomed as it forces the Texas Legislature to do its job that it has failed to do in the last legislative session and special sessions. The June 1st deadline places a great degree of urgency on the process that the lawmakers would never have agreed to by themselves. The Texas Legislature has been listening to lobbyists and special interest groups, while ignoring a brewing property tax revolt by the citizens.

The very first thing that the Texas Legislature should do immediately is commission independent audits of every school district in Texas to see where the money is being spent and uncover waste and outright fraud. Then determine what amount of revenue is required and any new taxes needed to meet the requirement while cutting property taxes, but not before the audits.

A cursory look at one local school district uncovered $10 million in annual savings with little effort. The total being wasted in Texas is likely to approach hundreds of millions of dollars.

67 posted on 11/23/2005 5:54:18 AM PST by Unmarked Package
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

wow! awesome !!

Pray that the Supreme Court (which is under God) will uphold this right decision of the Texas court.


68 posted on 11/23/2005 5:55:16 AM PST by millefleur (No KING but Jesus !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

This is what needs ruled in PA for sure... their latest "property tax relief" includes them increasing income taxes by 2.8 BILLION dollars, to give property tax "relief" of 1.8 BILLION..... and they expect the public to not notice that 1 BILLION increase in taxes....

VOTE THE BUMS OUT!!!


69 posted on 11/23/2005 5:59:09 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

This is actually a hamfisted attempt by the Texas Judiciary to IMPOSE an income tax on one of the few states that does not have one. It is HORRIBLE!!!!


83 posted on 11/23/2005 7:24:41 AM PST by chronic_loser (Handle provided free of charge as flame bait for the neurally vacant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

So if they don't use the property tax to raise the $30 billion, where do you think they'll get the money? Maybe a a Texas size bake sale? (More likely an income tax)


95 posted on 11/23/2005 8:00:37 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson