Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What, IN THE NAME OF GOD, is wrong with the Pentagon when Able Danger could rip the entire lid off the DemonRat party??
1 posted on 11/10/2005 1:37:14 PM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: Mo1; Bahbah

*ping*


2 posted on 11/10/2005 1:38:48 PM PST by tiredoflaundry ("Youth" - French for Muslim Rioters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

whatever it is, its not coming from mid level operatives inside DoD - the orders to suppress this are coming from high up.


3 posted on 11/10/2005 1:39:38 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
This is outrageous. This needs waaaay more exposure.

And I think FR is going to make sure it happens.

4 posted on 11/10/2005 1:40:11 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
What, IN THE NAME OF GOD, is wrong with the Pentagon when Able Danger could rip the entire lid off the DemonRat party??

You answered your own question.

Be more cynical.

5 posted on 11/10/2005 1:41:03 PM PST by NeoCaveman (Good job Ohio, we defeated George Soros at the ballot box 2 years in a row)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

Might as well run the red carpet from Chapaqwa to the White House now for HER.


6 posted on 11/10/2005 1:41:16 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: An.American.Expatriate; ASA.Ranger; ASA Vet; Atigun; beyond the sea; BIGLOOK; ...

MI Ping


8 posted on 11/10/2005 1:41:57 PM PST by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk, those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
If it was Top Secret and he leaked it then he should be dismissed. However, he should be given the same status as the democrats who lead Top Secret Information (it seems on a daily basis).

However, I agree that it could blow the democrats out of their rabbit hole along with Saddam whom they admire. Did they not say that could find no information on this organization. Congress should get the information declassified and put it out for the American People to see. The press would never print it or talk about it but we might get it out on the net.
9 posted on 11/10/2005 1:42:07 PM PST by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

OMG.....where is RUMSFELD? Where is BUSH? Where is JUSTICE? I am beginning to DESPISE the Republicans as much as Democrats!!


12 posted on 11/10/2005 1:45:41 PM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience. T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
when Able Danger could rip the entire lid off the DemonRat party??

...exactly, believe it or not, there are dummies in the Pentagon

Doogle

13 posted on 11/10/2005 1:48:29 PM PST by Doogle (USAF...7thAF ..4077th TFW...408th MMS..Ubon Thailand.."69",,Night Line Delivery..AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

Obviously some Republican Ox would be gored too if all the facts come out. Weldon is the last hope and every effort is
being made to marginalize him and the evidence he wants to present.


16 posted on 11/10/2005 1:51:26 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

I hate to say it, but it looks like Able Danger is going to get swept right under the rug.


19 posted on 11/10/2005 1:55:26 PM PST by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
What, IN THE NAME OF GOD, is wrong with the Pentagon when Able Danger could rip the entire lid off the DemonRat party??

Because a full and complete investigation will implicate many -- both parties. They would rather 'Rather' their incompetence than reveal the truth. This issue is too political to ever see the light of day.

The only saving grace is that, according to Rep. Weldon, several Congresspersons have requested 'criminal investigation' into the matter. Also, per Weldon, the main obstacle currently is at the very top of the Defense Department -- and that is a civilian position held by a non-Democrat and his initials are Donald Rumsfeld.
20 posted on 11/10/2005 1:55:59 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

(really bad words)


23 posted on 11/10/2005 1:59:26 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

All of the CYA Clinton appointees in the Pentagon at work.


24 posted on 11/10/2005 2:00:01 PM PST by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

Probably a call from a Dem on Defense or Appropriations warning that the military funding was on the line if this lid blew off.


25 posted on 11/10/2005 2:00:29 PM PST by theDentist (The Dems have put all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

question your assumptions


27 posted on 11/10/2005 2:10:27 PM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

You just said what was wrong with the Pentagon, Most of the top Generals probably are the suck butts Bill Clinton moved up when he got rid of the real soldiers. they dont want their buddy- Bubba to have to face the truth.


28 posted on 11/10/2005 2:10:39 PM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

"What, IN THE NAME OF GOD, is wrong with the Pentagon when Able Danger could rip the entire lid off the DemonRat party??"

If you understand the military, you'll realize their role is NOT to "rip the entire lid off the DemonRat party??"

The military leadership are historically non-political.

If you think otherwise, you are living in a fantasyland.


31 posted on 11/10/2005 2:19:16 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
C'mon Washington....fess up.
33 posted on 11/10/2005 2:25:38 PM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
The retribution probably has some roots in the politicization of the military armed services under the eight years of Clinton. It was blatant, as my own experience may explain.

I was commissioned as a Navy Officer in 1980, and was active duty for about five years. As a Naval Reserve Officer for the next ten years, I was a senior officer (CDR/05) by 1994 (14 years, pretty quick, by Navy standards). I was selected to my second (reserve) Command about the time Clinton took office. Because my business took me across country from California to the East Coast, and because my unit was newly commissioned, and the entire program was ramping up, I spent about 4-5 months in Washington at my own expense, while my XO ("Executive Officer") managed the unit back in California.

During several "orientations" (some for newly appointed C.O.'s, and some related to my professional field), the "guest speaker" was a recent Clinton Administration political appointee (Deputy SECDEF, Deputy SECNAV, etc.). It was clear to me that a new game plan was afoot. The Clintonistas were blatantly politicizing the military. Future promotions, future "billets (jobs) of increasing responsibility", and the military career of mid-level and senior officers would depend upon signing on to the Clinton game plan (i.e. social, and otherwise, e.g. "rightsizing", acceptance of gays and women in combat units, promoting an "appropriate" world view to the troops).

To be honest, over 15 years I'd achieved all I ever wanted to achieve as a Navy Officer, there weren't a great number of billet's I aspired to, and everything from that point on would have taken me from shipboard or the field (SEABEE, Expeditionary units, etc.) where the "action" was. Jobs for a "senior" Navy Reserve officer in my specialty were pretty "worthless" from that point on, so I was probably heading out the door in any case.

However, after a half dozen political propaganda lectures, and when I saw officers known to be "left-of-center" politically being selected for Command and other opportunities of influence over clearly more experienced and qualified officers, I could tell which way the wind was blowing. It was a good time to leave, and I now had a good reason to bail out.

Bottom line: A lot of the guys who are now General and Flag officers in the U.S. Military were "political commissars" whose careers were advanced by leftist Democrats in the Clinton Administration (and in Congress). They ascended in rank, position, and experience because they played ball during 1993-2000. They're still on active duty, and in positions of significant influence and responsibility. The Clinton's had 8 years to recreate the Officer's corps in their own image. "Tailhook" was all about expunging "warrior" officers who wouldn't play ball, and making examples of them that their peers would clearly understand.

The U.S. Military is good, and do not doubt that I have a lot of respect for our guys - our warriors currently on active duty. But there are still a whole bunch of Pentagon queens in place out there; the military establishment in Washington is very probably, still a politicized animal. Our best officers today are the 01-04 (2nd LT to Major, or Ensign to LT CMDR for the Navy). The "kids" who came onto active duty in 1998-2005 are fighting this war, and doing a spectacular job.

SFS

36 posted on 11/10/2005 2:33:13 PM PST by Steel and Fire and Stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson