Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MERCK WINS IN COURT: VIOXX WARNING WAS SUFFICIENT!
ap

Posted on 11/03/2005 7:38:42 AM PST by SoFloFreeper

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) -- In a major victory for Merck & Co., a jury has found the drugmaker properly warned consumers about Vioxx risks. The finding means Merck will not be held liable for the 2001 heart attack suffered by a man taking the painkiller.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ambulancechasers; biglaw; biglawers; biglegal; bigshysters; deeppockets; drugs; greedyshysters; grubbinglawyers; lawsuitmachine; merck; pharmaceuticals; ruling; vioxx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-147 next last
To: RnMomof7

The problem is not with doctors who did not monitor the problem, it is with patients who do not tell their doctors about side effects or adverse reactions from a drug.


61 posted on 11/03/2005 8:27:55 AM PST by SoothsayerToo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RC77

Just answer the question: what was his dossage? Vioxx was WELL documented to have a problem at large dossages, my wife was on it I've read the documentation, was he over the line or wasn't he. The juries should be smart enough to see through ALL the cases because ALL the cases are bunk, the warnings were there, if the person's doctor didn't pay enough attention then the person (or their survivors) should sue the doctor not the drug manufacturer.


62 posted on 11/03/2005 8:28:41 AM PST by discostu (When someone tries to kill you, you try to kill them right back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Spyder

I suppose anything is possible but 85% of our cases are people under the age of 55, try explaining all these people having strokes while they all were on Vioxx. 30% of our case are -or had their stroke/heart attack- in their 40's. Is this typical? I submit all these people had one thing in common the misfortune of taking Vioxx.


63 posted on 11/03/2005 8:31:27 AM PST by RC77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

This leaves just the doctors who prescribed the medications as liable. Still a lawsuit target, just not so deep pockets.


64 posted on 11/03/2005 8:34:24 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC77

I work in the software industry, we average having a heart attack by 38. Young people have heart attacks too.


65 posted on 11/03/2005 8:36:14 AM PST by discostu (When someone tries to kill you, you try to kill them right back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: discostu

I am not going to 'bleed' this persons file on a thread or anywhere else. Our cases will be well documented, we are well known -hopefully respected- (Ford Pinto as a hint). Depending on settlements some may choose to keep their names annonymous. What is unsettling is this blind allegiance to a drug company,simply because it is the 'conservative way' to be.


66 posted on 11/03/2005 8:37:27 AM PST by RC77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RC77
I submit all these people had one thing in common the misfortune of taking Vioxx.

And I submit they had one more commonality as well - they heard they could make a fortune by filing a case against Vioxx. Before ANY Cox-2's came on the market there were heart attacks and strokes in the population under 55 all the time. Perhaps it wasn't the most common cause of death in that age group, but it wasn't that far down the list. I worked at a university hospital in the 70s and we had lots of patients under 55 with assorted cardiovascular and cerebrovascular conditions.

I now do transcription, and probably 15% of the notes I type are patients in that younger age group who have assorted vascular disorders, high lipids, high blood pressure, etc., etc., none of whom have been "lucky" enough to be able to blame Vioxx. With 270 million or so population, I don't doubt your find a lot of people who want to jump on the sue-Vioxx bandwagon.

67 posted on 11/03/2005 8:42:03 AM PST by Spyder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SoothsayerToo
"The problem is not with doctors who did not monitor the problem, it is with patients who do not tell their doctors about side effects or adverse reactions from a drug."

Perhaps, but when my doctor had me taking a cholesterol-lowering drug, I reported side effects of muscle pain, etc. and he said "that's not from the drug" and wanted me to continue. I stopped taking them on my own, against his wishes, with absolutely no change in my cholesterol levels! A year or two later, patients were dying from these statin drugs. Now they take the side effect reports more seriously.

68 posted on 11/03/2005 8:42:25 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
Yeah, he gave a courthouse step interview after the trail. I feel sorry for him that he's poorly but he has a choice to be an ass or not and his claptrap about Vioxx being a "poison pill" gave me a heart attack. Think I have a case?

I guess working for the postal service well qualifies one to make such judgements.

What a freaking dolt. He should have his pension taken to pay for for bringing such a lame action.

69 posted on 11/03/2005 8:43:16 AM PST by Proud_texan ("Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue." - Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

good news


70 posted on 11/03/2005 8:43:22 AM PST by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

WOOHOO!!


71 posted on 11/03/2005 8:43:30 AM PST by Dashing Dasher (www.cafepress.com/rwos == for your Republican Women of Substance Gear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Those EEEEEVILLLL drug companies! It's time for an appeal, an appeal I say!


72 posted on 11/03/2005 8:44:45 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
Image hosted by Photobucket.com since about 7000 people die every year from taking aspirin, we should take that off the market too... right???
73 posted on 11/03/2005 8:45:33 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RC77

There's no blind allegiance here to anything but the FACTS. The FACTS are that the risks of Vioxx were well documented by Vioxx and the FDA, and should have been well known by prescribing doctors and patients that read the documentation should have recognized the warning signs and informed their doctor that they were having a reaction. All drugs can be dangerous, people who don't know what they're sticking in their mouth and don't pay attention to their bodies reaction are putting themselves at risk. And the fact that you need to start insulting people just shows how much even you know the facts aren't on your side.


74 posted on 11/03/2005 8:46:25 AM PST by discostu (When someone tries to kill you, you try to kill them right back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: spectre
There isn't one Prescription drug out there that doesn't carry a risk.

Yep. And to put a finer point on it—LIVING carries a risk.

75 posted on 11/03/2005 8:49:10 AM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Good. End the frivolous and illegal lawsuits.


76 posted on 11/03/2005 8:50:08 AM PST by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Sometimes I wonder why the drug companies even bother to bring new drugs to market. All they ever get is multi-billion dollar lawsuits.

Multi Billion dollar profits?

77 posted on 11/03/2005 8:53:23 AM PST by Cliff Dweller ("get thar fustest with the mostest." GEN Nathan Bedford Forrest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RC77

The study which caused Merck to pull Vioxx only indicated a 7.5% increase in heart attacks. So you are going to tell me that vioxx is the main cause of the heart attack in everyone who had a heart attack while taking vioxx. Somehow your facts dont add up.


78 posted on 11/03/2005 8:56:19 AM PST by antihannityguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Having followed this subject closely, Merck (Arcoxia)and Novartis (Prexige) have 2nd generaion Cox-2 drugs waiting approval. Additional study results are due next year. They are already using them in Europe and South America.

My HMO doctors will not even talk to me about using Celebrex.

79 posted on 11/03/2005 8:56:49 AM PST by WalterSkinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae
Do you have the "Knights of NI!" as well???

ARTHUR: O Knights of Ni, we have brought you your shrubbery. May we go now?
HEAD KNIGHT: It is a good shrubbery. I like the laurels particularly,... but there is one small problem.
ARTHUR: What is that?
HEAD KNIGHT: We are now... no longer the Knights Who Say 'Ni'.
KNIGHTS OF NI: Ni! Shh!
HEAD KNIGHT: Shh! We are now the Knights Who Say 'Ecky- ecky- ecky- ecky- pikang- zoop- boing- goodem- zoo- owli- zhiv'.
RANDOM: Ni!
HEAD KNIGHT: Therefore, we must give you a test.
ARTHUR: What is this test, O Knights of-- knights who till recently said 'ni'?
HEAD KNIGHT: Firstly, you must find... another shrubbery!
[dramatic chord]
ARTHUR: Not another shrubbery!
RANDOM: Ni!
HEAD KNIGHT: Then, when you have found the shrubbery, you must place it here beside this shrubbery, only slightly higher so you get the two-level effect with a little path running down the middle.
KNIGHTS OF NI: A path! A path! A path! Ni! Shh! Ni! Ni! Ni! Shh! Shh!...
HEAD KNIGHT: Then, when you have found the shrubbery, you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!
[dramatic chord]
KNIGHTS OF NI: A herring!
ARTHUR: We shall do no such thing!
HEAD KNIGHT: Oh, please!

The entire script is available at: http://www.mwscomp.com/movies/grail/grail.htm along with a lot more Holy Grail stuff.

80 posted on 11/03/2005 9:00:42 AM PST by VRWCmember (hard-core, politically angry, hyperconservative, and loaded with vitriol about everything liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson