Posted on 10/29/2005 2:42:05 AM PDT by Hadean
TEHRAN (AFP) - Iran has vowed it has no intention to attack Israel and it will keep to its international engagements as laid out in the UN charter, the IRNA agency reported.
Iran has vowed it has no intention to attack Israel and it will keep to its international engagements as laid out in the UN charter, the IRNA agency reported. "The Islamic republic of Iran is committed to its engagements based on the UN charter and has never resorted to, nor threatened to resort to force against another country," the foreign ministry said in a statement quoted by the IRNA agency.
This is the first time Iran has made clear it has no intention to attack Israel since President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad caused an international outcry on Wednesday by saying that the Jewish state should be "wiped off the map".
Thecountry also rounded on UN Security Council condemnation of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's anti-Israeli remarks was "unacceptable" and dictated by the "Zionist regime", the state IRNA agency reported.
"The declaration published by the Security Council -- proposed by the Zionist regime to cover its crimes and give an image at odds with reality -- is unacceptable," the foreign ministry said in a statement quoted by the agency.
The ministry expressed surprise that the Security Council did not condemn the threats of military action made against Tehran by the United States and Israel or the "crimes" of the Israeli regime.
"How many times has the Security Council met to examine the threats made against one member of the United Nations and how many declarations has it made condemning them," it asked.
Ahmadinejad has defended his call made last week for Israel to be "wiped off the map" despite an escalating international outcry. The UN Security Council on Friday issued a statement condemning the comments.
Amin Al Husseini seen inspecting his Hanzar Division made up exclusively of Muslims, mostly from the Crotia/Bosnia/Serbia region. They actively lead the genocide against Serbs, Serbian Jews and Gypsies.
Amin Al Husseini meets with Adolf Hitler in November 1942, weeks before the decision to implement the Final Solution which sent Europe's Jews to the gas chamber. The Third Reich provided Amin Al Husseini with a salary and appointed him Head of the Hanzar SS Division. The Hanzar Division was made of Nazi Muslims and implemented the genocide of 250,000 Serbs, Gypsies and Jews during WWII.
Amin Al Husseini shown here on a Nazi poster recruiting fellow Muslims to join Hitler in the fight against the West and the Jews. His disciples today include Yasser Arafat, Saddam Hussein and the leaders of Hamas, Al Qeida and Islamic Jihad.
Amin Al Husseini, future President of the World Islamic Congress (1961) and founding father of the Arab League (1944) inspects his Muslim Nazi troops, the Hanzar Division. Amin Al Husseini making the traditional nazi salute.
Yasser Arafat became a disciple of Amin Al Husseini since the age of 17. Here: recent picture of Palestinian soldiers under the leadership of Arafat making the traditional Nazi salute.
WWII . Amin Al Husseini spent most of the war in Berlin. He was on Hitler's payroll as he lead the Hanzar Division of Muslim SS and played a lead-role in determining the fate of Europe's Jewish community.. From Berlin, Amin Al Husseini helped organize the transfer of Nazi officers into the Middle East
Amin Al Husseini inspecting his Nazi troops, the Hanzar. Here, he is showing a young Muslim recruit how to use his rifle. Amin Al Husseini himself had been an officer in the defeated Ottoman Islamic Empire of World War I.<
Didnt their buddy Adolf say he didnt have any designs on his neighbors too? They learned well how to string along the useful idiots of the mainstream media and UN.
MSM, still stuck on stupid.
Gee, what will their local neighborhood terrorists think now that Iran has publicly blinked?!
ON THE NET...
WASHINGTON TIMES.com: Ramallah, West Bank - "IRAN LEADER PREDICTS ISRAEL'S DEMISE" by Joshua Mitnick (ARTICLE SNIPPET: "Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad yesterday predicted a wave of Palestinian attacks that would erase Israel "from the face of the Islamic world," just hours before a suicide bomber killed five Israelis in a marketplace. The attack, which wounded about 30, also made a mockery of a major speech by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who appealed in Ramallah yesterday for an end to attacks that he said were undermining attempts to establish a Palestinian state.") (October 27, 2005)
He's scared the living sh*t out of the Gulf Arabs.
Maybe now they won't protest so much when they see Stealth bombers flying over their airspace on their way to Bushehr, Arak, Natanz, etc., to have a rendez vous with destiny.
I suspect that it will just be a blockade. The students in Iran will do the rest for us.
they have to be armed or supported if we expect them to finish the job
If you believe him I have a bridge you might like to buy.
Paul Berman-despite his somewhat flawed conclusions-is acutely aware of the Islamist's insidiously appealing ideology.
I don't know if you've read "Terror & Liberalism," but it's a frightening window into the soul of our enemies.
Of course not, it'll just hand the suitcase to some drugged out 16 year old palestian waiting to get laid in heaven by 72 beautiful California Girls.
How do they expect the mullahcrocy to be deposed if we ignore the pleadings of Azeris, Afghan refugees, and Kurds, among many others who can act as agents of change in this regard?
I don't like the cult of Rajavi any more than the next person, but if they can help us achieve our goals what's wrong with making a tactical alliance with them?
The INC was comprised of divergent-often warring-factions, such as the PUK,SCIRI, Dawa, the Iraqi National Accord, and the former Communists, and yet that did not prevent the United States and the United Kingdom from assisting them.
This is not a situation where you can look scornfully at the past.
Where you can say, yes, but what about the Iranian revolution of two and a half decades ago? Do we want to repeat the mistakes of the past?
Oh, the Shah was bad, but look at what we got in return!
No, we shouldn't-and we can't-look at things from that perspective.
We need to adhere to Churchill's axiom.
If the Devil himself were opposed to Hitler...
There is no fear of what could possibly be a worse successor state to the current terror-sponsor/theocracy, because such a scenario is so unlikely that it strains credulity to even entertain the thought.
Interesting story with the pics!
Well! That's all better then./sarc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.