Posted on 10/28/2005 5:00:46 AM PDT by kcvl
Per Fox News...
No surprise there
Maybe he is to them.
Really? Then explain to me why Joe didn't have to sign a non-disclosure form, never filed a written report and was able to write an article ABOUT the very subject that his wife is engaged in."
But he asked the wrong question.
This investigation should never have even have gotten to the point of trying to learn who said what to whom in June, 2003, because:
1. Plame doesn't fall under the class of people covered by the law.
2. She was already "outed" long before the events in question.
The DUmmies aren't baffled! They think this guy is the 2nd coming! That should give you an indication of how messed up he is!
Ohhh... I forgot... They are WAYYY above us in integellence! No wonder nobody else gets it!
I think the markets liked this news.........
The more he talks the more he discredits himself.
He really stepped in it by claiming the underlying "crime" was a violation of the Espionage Act.
NO ONE, NOBODY has ever been prosecuted for "leaking" under the espionage act! It's almost a hundred year old law. Why is that?
That is ludicrous, and would give Bush a perfect excuse to pardon Libby.
Fitzgerald is a runaway prosecutor. Unreal.
David Corn is asking a question...why does he need to ask a question when he has an iv leaking directly into his left arm from the CIA.
Many of these people have asked 3-4 questions... this is unreal. He loves this spotlight.
I dont know. There is a lot of noise here. That is what folks remember.
The reporters' subdued questions might be not only that they're finding his "narrative" puzzling, but also that they are beginning to realize that by indicting Libby, 3 of THEIR OWN will be under oath on the witness stand in the coming trial. LOL
ABC Radio News ALWAYS misreports the news....
The bureaucracy is eating itself.
Clinton's perjury was important because it disclosed how Bubba's team handled numerous investigations. Bribes, intimidation, lies, and more. The man was attempting to deny a woman her day in court.
Here there may not have been a crime to hide but Fitz (not covert and the media may have already known the detail) but there may have been perjury. I thought the media had many experts who said that people don't get charged with perjury.
This dipweed is liking this too much. He is trying sooo hard to make this seem very important.
Make for a good tagline, too!
We're pissed. Liberals are pissed.
Fitz probably thinks he got it just right!
Lewis "Ham Sandwich" Libby....indeed
Right. But that won't stop the media from slanting the story toward his sainthood.
My understanding is that this woman has been driving to work at Langley for the past 7 years or so.
Now I don't know about Langley but at the military bases I served on we had to have stickers on our cars to gain entry without headaches.
That sticker on my car made it common knowledge that I was either in the Army or I worked there as a civilian.
I can't imagine that Langley doesn't do the same.
Anybody know for sure?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.