Posted on 10/27/2005 5:54:48 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
Since the hard right has chosen to undermine him in his first choice, the President is now free to pick whomever he wants. Can you say Justice Gonzales?
By calling them out on their hypocrisy. Conservatives just got a shot in the arm with Miers' withdrawal, and so now is not the time to start nervously limiting ourselves. Anyone - Dem or Republican - who starts going on about how JRB is "outside the mainstream" needs to be challenged to say exactly what he means by that. Because her most distinguishing characteristic, from the perspective of people who talk like that, is a relative lack of willingness to strike down laws enacted by that same "mainstream". That needs to be hammered over and over again, and conservatives need to be unified on that point. The more ridiculous the RINO's and Dems are shown to be in front of the entire country, the less swagger you'll see in the way they talk. Those who are up for reelection in '06 will bear that in mind.
The most important thing for conservatives to remember is that no matter what the MSM says, we are in the mainstream when it comes to judges, because our judges aren't used as ways of circumventing the legisltative process. That's what the Left wants in judges, because they know they're outside the mainstream. So as long as we don't lose heart, we'll prevail, because ultimately, this is merely a game of psychological warfare that the Left is playing with us. As long as we're not caught off guard, they will lose that game.
For all of the Gonzales threats, he carries the exact same baggage, and likely to a greater degree. You're right in your assessment, D.O. Blackbird.
Several of the top names thrown around here (PO, JRB, etc) were supposedly asked and most, if not all, said emphatically, that they had NOT asked to be removed from consideration. So I dont know who was on that short list that asked to be removed.
Rabid Bush haters do not last long on this site, but hey, that is not really the point of you comment is it. Your tactic is exactly the same as used by the dem party to shut down any opposition in the ranks by belittling anybody taking a different view, everybody must frog march together with out a single person stepping out and questioning the direction of where they are going, who cares if it is over the cliff.
I guess that unlike you I will always question where we are being led and is it really the right choice. Most people here have a higher IQ than that in the dem party and do not take well to being talked down to like naughty 5 year olds because we do not agree with every thing you think.
The one thing I like best about Freerepublic is the give and take on all issues until the truth is vetted out. Trying to shut down the civil argument because you are not being agreed with is just stupid, we will just go back to the old flame wars.
As much as I would like them to make it thru, I doubt they will. We cut our own noses off to spite our face.
Great. Now we have every dem talking head crawling out of the woodwork, calling the "right-wing" naughty children that the President should ignore for the rest of his term.
I don't think this withdrawal has anything to do with Fitz, but, there's no better way to rally the troops in the face of adversity than to nominate someone like JRB. When you lose a battle, you want to shore up the core of your support.
To clarify, I meant Gonzales, like you had said, not Estrada, like I typed. My coffee hasn't kicked in yet. :-P
Actually that lie has been discredited..Ill try and find the source..but Jancie Rogers brown vehimently insisted that she did NOT aske to be withdrawn from consideration in fact this same report indicated that every candidate on the "short list" that was known of was contacted and non of them said they asked to be withdrawn from consideration.
The Troglo-cons and Beltway Babblers need new undies!
I want a nominee so conservative that Kennedy's head explodes right on the Senate floor, spewing cheap whisky all over the place.
Are you so sure? Hatch? A reliable conservative? His name has been mud on this site many times.
It's possible, but there are some very good judges that just haven't gotten as much publicity. Alice Batchelder(?), Maura Corrigan, a few others.
Excuse me, guys, if I don't celebrate. I think this woman was treated unfairly from the beginning. I can't say whether she would have made a good Supreme Court Justice because I didn't know a whole lot about her or what she would have done had she been a Justice. Trouble is that neither did just about everyone else; yet a number of people used rumor, inneundo and just plain viciousness in an effort to kill her nomination...and all for their own political and personal agenda. The woman was never given a fair hearing. Sorry, folks...I thought the conduct of many from both the right camp and the left in this matter was just plain deplorable.
I hope he goes back to the origainal long list of possible nominees, and nominates the best posssible person, whether a man or woman.
I fear he does not "like" the women on the list, which is why he went to Miers, whom he likes.
It would be nice if Laura and Andy Card would stay out of this nomination.
"we now know who the conservatives are and who are the republican koolaid drinkers."
Sen. Brownback from Kansas said a good comment this morning on NPR, "We are not a party of one man. We are a party of ideas." and "This episode has not weakened us but strengthened us in making us remember our ideas.", or words to that effect.
One thing useful about this episode - we now know who the conservatives are and who are the republican koolaid drinkers.
_____________
You don't know jack, man. That's the most ridiculous post I've ever seen, except on DU.
Thanks. I appreciate it.
Folks shouldn't see this as a defeat for the President. While it is a setback, it will likely set the stage for him making a very good choice, someone who will serve with distiction for decades.
Those who support Bush should understand that will be a far better fate than (possibly) seeing someone morph into a Souter and embarass this Presidency for decades to come.
Bush and the nation will fair better from this, IMO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.