Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: livius

Since the hard right has chosen to undermine him in his first choice, the President is now free to pick whomever he wants. Can you say Justice Gonzales?


861 posted on 10/27/2005 6:55:55 AM PDT by maxter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: maxter
Can you say Justice Gonzales?

Not gonna happen. This is from the President's statement today:

I understand and share her concern, however, about the current state of the Supreme Court confirmation process. It is clear that Senators would not be satisfied until they gained access to internal documents concerning advice provided during her tenure at the White House - disclosures that would undermine a President's ability to receive candid counsel. Harriet Miers' decision demonstrates her deep respect for this essential aspect of the Constitutional separation of powers - and confirms my deep respect and admiration for her.

Given this statement, it's clear that the President is not going to nominate a former White House counsel. Period.

884 posted on 10/27/2005 6:59:39 AM PDT by TonyInOhio ("Men must be governed by God or they will be ruled by tyrants.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies ]

To: maxter
Since the hard right has chosen to undermine him in his first choice, the President is now free to pick whomever he wants. Can you say Justice Gonzales?

Huh?

Are you seriously arguing that the Pres will pick someone to "spite" us? Does he want NO seats in Congress in 2006?

918 posted on 10/27/2005 7:03:22 AM PDT by mosquitobite (What we permit; we promote. ~ Mark Sanford for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson