Posted on 10/27/2005 4:52:55 AM PDT by Seaside
Visiting Seattle on the eve of possible grand jury indictments against top White House advisers over the leak of his wife's identity as an undercover CIA officer, former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson said it was "a sad day for our country."
Wilson said Wednesday he took little comfort that the men he believes have engaged in a campaign of character assassination against him for the past two years -- Karl Rove, President Bush's deputy chief of staff, and Lewis "Scooter" Libby, the vice president's chief of staff -- may soon be facing charges and possible jail time.
"The fact that this may become a crisis of governance should please no one," Wilson said at a private hotel reception before speaking in downtown Seattle Wednesday evening.
Wilson, 55, was here to present information from his book, "The Politics of Truth: Inside the Lies that Led to War and Betrayed My Wife's CIA Identity: A Diplomat's Memoir." His speech was part of Foolproof's American Voices series.
Greeted by a boisterous, packed house of about 900 people at Seattle's Town Hall, Wilson said that by publicly questioning the president's reasoning for the war in Iraq, he was simply acting in the country's best traditions.
"It is called holding your government to account for what it says and does in the name of the American people. We need to put this government on notice that it truly is a government of the people, by the people and for the people.
"When a government takes the country to war on lies and misinformation," he said to rousing applause, "that government ceases to be a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
"And that government becomes a government that preys on the people."
Though Rove and Libby appear to be at the heart of the grand jury investigation, The New York Times reported this week that, according to lawyers involved in the case, Vice President Dick Cheney first disclosed the name of Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, to Libby in June 2003.
But Libby testified to the grand jury, according to lawyers close to the case, that he first heard the name of Wilson's wife from journalists.
Wilson said he was withholding judgment regarding the claims about Cheney. "I don't know what to think of that, except to say it saddens me deeply. I get no satisfaction from that."
The two-year grand jury investigation is now coming to a head. Special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald met for several hours Wednesday with the grand jury in Washington, D.C., and his announcement regarding possible indictments could come as soon as today.
Knowingly disclosing the identity of covert federal agents is a crime. Fitzgerald is also investigating other possible crimes, including obstruction of justice, making false statements to a grand jury and mishandling classified information.
Wilson served as a career diplomat from 1976 to 1998. In 2002, he was asked to investigate claims that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein was seeking uranium from Niger for a nuclear weapons program.
When his inquiry turned up nothing, Wilson said he reported to officials in Washington that the claims were unfounded.
Wilson publicized his beliefs in a July 2003 Op-Ed column for The New York Times, arguing that the Bush White House had distorted intelligence about Saddam's attempts to acquire nuclear materials in order to justify the invasion of Iraq.
The article angered the administration, which denied the accusation.
Eight days later, in what Wilson and his supporters saw as raw personal payback, syndicated newspaper columnist Robert Novak published a column noting that he had been told by top administration officials that Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, a CIA officer, may have played a major role in having Wilson sent to Niger.
"What I did was write 1,500 words in The New York Times," he said during the speech. "This was not an act of civil disobedience. This was an act of civil responsibility."
Wilson said he doesn't regret telling a Shoreline audience in August 2003 that Rove ought to be "frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs" -- though, he said in his interview with the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, "I didn't realize it would be picked up by every right-wing blog."
He said the more important thing is that Rove leave the White House, whether or not he's wearing handcuffs.
Wilson declined to say whether it's important, ultimately, that high officials serve prison time if indicted and found guilty.
What is key, he said, is that the legal system functions properly and justice is served.
"I believe in the institutions that have made our country great for 229 years," he said. "I continue to believe that the system, rooted to the rule of law, will be up to the task."
P-I reporter Paul Shukovsky contributed to this report. P-I reporter Sam Skolnik can be reached at 206-448-8334 or samskolnik@seattlepi.com.
"Wilson said Wednesday he took little comfort that the men he believes have engaged in a campaign of character assassination against him for the past two years. "
Wilson shouldn't be too upset over this since the 'campaign of character assassination' never happened and, chances are, the 'indictments against top White House advisers' probably won't either.
This is the speech of someone planning a run for office OR a "big job" in a Dem Administration. "Consultant, my a**. Joe's a prostitute". He and the Dems just haven't settled on the price.
Problem with this section of the first sentence? No proven leak; she wasn't undercover. But what are a few factual misrepresentations in a news story?
Check out how secret her status was. From Wizbang
http://wizbangblog.com/archives/007427.php
This guy is Cindy Sheehan in better clothes.
How does someone who can't control their mouth become a "diplomat"?
...with a spouse.
Consider that he got Valerie to out herself on their thrid date. Does he carry an engagement ring with him at all times? Who did Valerie call at the CIA to ask if she could tell Joe about her status? HE was married to someone else at the time. No covert agent would reveal themselves without permission.
I bet he does, just wait for a trial and their little scheme comes out. Let's see who really is quilty of a crime here.
Doesn't it stand to reason that in order for character assassination to happen, one first has to have character?
I remember clearly that Joe Wilson claimed it was "okay that she told him, as he had the requisite security clearances." (paraphrased slightly)
This is complete and utter BS because such information is "need to know" only and both of them would have been well aware of it.
I knew Mr. Wilson was a liar pretty much from the beginning, because that statement was in one of the first articles I read about him.
Don't blame Wilson, there will and always have been creeps like this.
But imagine if this were the Clinton Admin, Wilson would get NO coverage, except a little as a member of the VRWC/loon.
It is the NY liberal media monopoly who writes the script for this country.
What they want, they get.
This is complete and utter BS because such information is "need to know" only and both of them would have been well aware of it.
Well, she had to have some excuse for that "listening device" he found! ;-P
If there ever was a "campaign of character assassination", it was the most low-key campaign in history. I sure never heard tell of it.
But Libby testified to the grand jury, according to lawyers close to the case, that he first heard the name of Wilson's wife from journalists.
Assuming the above is true, there is no logical contradiction in these sentences, but far be it for the reporter to be able to figure that out. If he has figured it out, his agenda has him twisting it into the worst light possible.
Even if Cheney first disclosed Valerie's name to Libby in 6/2003, it doesn't mean Libby could not first have heard Valerie's name from journalists. Are the lawyers that dumb, too, or is it just the "journalists?"
HF
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.