Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George Clooney’s Clueless Movie
Human Events Online ^ | October 14, 2005 | Allan H. Ryskind

Posted on 10/14/2005 11:46:13 AM PDT by bigsky

If George Clooney’s Good Night, and Good Luck is the best shot the left can unload on Joe McCarthy these days, the famous Red hunter is well on his way to a thorough rehabilitation. Ann Coulter has already begun the process in Treason and Stan Evans’ much anticipated book—due out next year—is likely to boost the late Wisconsin senator’s stock even further.

The movie is really about CBS’s star journalist, Edward R. Murrow (played by David Strathairn), and how he went after McCarthy, who is featured only in film footage from the archives. As Clooney (and most historians) would have it, the senator was a vicious, unscrupulous bully who ruined the lives of scores of innocent people by labeling them Reds. So where are the bloody corpses in Clooney’s movie? They’re totally missing. In fact, Clooney—who directed and helped write the movie—doesn’t show a single person who was done in by the senator’s supposedly reckless charges. Not one!

(Excerpt) Read more at humaneventsonline.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: clooney; communist; coulter; goodluck; goodnight; mccarthy; movie; murrow; red; senate; senator; soviet; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: KC_Conspirator

I think "Guardians" (not "Trolls") is the game my "idiot" card is from too.


41 posted on 10/25/2005 9:45:55 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: radioman

With respect. It was the media that demonized him. He was actually not a demon. Read Coulter's "Treason" for an in-depth analysis of the "Have you no sense of decency!" incident. It is a classic piece of outright media distortion of what actually happened.


42 posted on 10/25/2005 9:47:18 AM PDT by Drawsing (The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: bigsky; Rodney King

I think a 'right-of-passage' for most Hollywood liberals is to come out with a piece that is critical of McCarthy. Woody Allen did it in THE FRONT; even Jim Carrey's recent movie THE MAJESTIC tries to work McCarthyism in as a backstory.


43 posted on 10/25/2005 10:01:22 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (The Fourth-Estate is a Fifth-Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican
I heard Clooney mortgaged his hollyweird mansion to pay for this movie to be made. I personally hope it bombs and he gets financially wiped out the same way Drew Barrymore did with Charlies Angels 2.

I don't think you heard that correctly. Accoring to Box Office Mojo, the film cost $7 million to make. That's pocket money for Clooney, even if he did put up the money himself. Which I doubt that he did - even if he didn't raise the money elsewhere for whatever reason, his production company would have put it up. No need to mortgage anything.

44 posted on 10/31/2005 11:48:21 AM PST by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael

'The Front' was actually written by one time blacklisted writer Walter Bernstein. And directed by blacklisted Martin Ritt. Allen was just an actor for hire in that one.


45 posted on 11/03/2005 9:00:51 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Thanks for the info.


46 posted on 11/04/2005 5:26:35 AM PST by DoctorMichael (The Fourth-Estate is a Fifth-Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: driftless
The moral of the story is never expect an honest depiction of history from a Hollywierd liberal.

It's time for someone like Roger Ailes with the help of Republican billionaires to form movie studios.

47 posted on 11/04/2005 5:31:52 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

The idea of a drama being 100% faithful to the facts is a pipe dream. There's never been one. The historian and the dramatist use different tools and should not be held to the same standards.


48 posted on 11/04/2005 7:28:55 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
"So where are the bloody corpses in Clooney?s movie?"

Plus McCarthy's "victim's never spent a day behind bars. If Murrow wanted to investigate a true threat to democracy then he should have looked at the Liberals. Look at FDR's forced internment of over 100,000 INNOCENT Americans of Japanese, Italian and German descent.

Try and find a movie which lays blame at the fabled Roosevelt's feet and you will not find it.

At least McCarthy's "victim's" got a hearing . And they never spent a day behind bars.
49 posted on 11/04/2005 8:24:28 AM PST by RedMonqey (Life is hard. It's even harder when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey
I just checked out the box office. This POS peaked at Number 12 and is already declining. And they were carpet bombing TV ads on some stations!

Good riddance to bad rubbish!

50 posted on 11/04/2005 8:52:10 AM PST by colorado tanker (I can't comment on things that might come before the Court, but I can tell you my Pinochle strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

She paid for that piece of cra- herself. I cannot believe she is that dumb?


51 posted on 12/01/2005 3:44:53 PM PST by red irish (Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bigsky

It's a bit sad to see the way the name McCarthy is dragged through the dirt, almost reflexively, by those who know nothing about what he did or what he stood for. The portrayal of Senator Joe McCarthy as a wild-eyed demagogue destroying innocent lives is sheer liberal hobgoblinism. Liberals weren't cowering in fear during the McCarthy era. They were systematically undermining the nation's ability to defend itself while waging a bellicose campaign of lies to blacken McCarthy's name.


52 posted on 01/23/2006 9:17:42 PM PST by DougJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; RedMonqey
Did you enjoy your little, umm, "break" between July 25 and August 4? Oh, and LOOK! Despite your signup date of "Aug.10, 2003", going to your posting history shows NOTHING before July 4, 2011. Troll.

Gee, I can't decide if you're senility, idiocy or jealously (a member FPer longer than you)has drove you mad but my postings are scattered from Aug.10, 2003 to today.

You must have missed your nap time.

Now take your meds, go to bed and you will feel must better in the morning.....


53 posted on 08/04/2011 4:59:35 PM PDT by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey; grey_whiskers

RedMonqey is not a high volume poster, but is a FReeper in good standing.


54 posted on 08/04/2011 5:05:49 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator

Sidebar Moderator

Thank you very much.

Althought my views are sometimes unique, I consider myself very conservative and try to abide by this forum’s guidelines, even when attacked...


55 posted on 08/04/2011 5:19:51 PM PDT by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey

Failed to kiss the ground Sarah Palin walks upon, huh?


56 posted on 08/04/2011 5:25:57 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: winoneforthegipper

Sidebar Moderator to RedMonqey; grey_whiskers

“RedMonqey is not a high volume poster, but is a FReeper in good standing.”

Just thought you need to know


57 posted on 08/04/2011 5:28:50 PM PDT by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Failed to kiss the ground Sarah Palin walks upon, huh?

Yep. Even though I like her and thinks she's been unjustly scorched by the media, it's not enough for the true believers. I just don't think she's the best we can do against obamma.
58 posted on 08/04/2011 5:33:23 PM PDT by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator
Acknowledged: however, please acknowledge in return that an apparent gap of YEARS between signup and first post, looks atypical.

(did he change names partway through?)

Cheers!

59 posted on 08/04/2011 6:14:56 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey
Huh. When I went to your homepage, and clicked "In Forum," and kept clicking "Previous Page" the list abruptly ended at July 4, 2011.

Quite unusual. A glitch in the software...?

Cheers!

60 posted on 08/04/2011 6:17:41 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson