What Hillary Knew: June 9, 2000

Hillary Clinton Accountability Project (HillCAP) ^ | October 12, 2005 | Hillary Clinton Accountability Project

[Interesting Times]

New evidence detailing the remarkable ability of Hillary Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign to hide contributions and fundraising expenses from the FEC.

There really oughta be a law...

[Interesting Times]

Investigating Hillary ping...

[Recovering Ex-hippie]

I'm really amazed at how CHEAP these people were, considering their wealth. ha.

Does this qualify as"hooking" just because Hildebeast didn't take off her clothes?

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[blackie]

Where is the outrage from liberal moonbats ~ oh, I forgot ~ she's the head liberal moonbat! *sigh*

[Maeve]

Very BUMPY bump.

[DoctorMichael]

I've always found it interesting that Stan Lee, the originator of Comic Book heros with personal problems and feelings (Spider Man, X-Men, etc., etc.), is seen at many Democratic functions.

Bttt

[yoe]

Deadbeat among other words fit Ms. Clinton's profile. Paul is sort of a diamond in the ruff like Bill and Hillary will take money from anyone even known drug traffickers. Utterly classless and clueless – Americans are sick of this trash being crammed down our throats daily.

NO TO HILLARY!!

[doug from upland]

I will be at the Reagan Building at 300 S. Spring on Friday morning to watch David Kendall perform. 10:00 AM, 3rd Floor, Div. 7. He is appealing the superior court decision that denied his motion to remove Hillary from Peter's civil lawsuit. It is their last gasp, and it is a foolish attempt. Kendall is claiming, using a bizarre interpretation of First Amendment free speech rights, that because Hillary was a candidate, she cannot be sued in a business fraud.

Can anyone be there in the morning with a movie camera? I am hoping to confront David Kendall outside and demand to know why he has been a co-conspirator in the fraud.

[Fedora]

Thanks!

[Interesting Times]

Does this qualify as"hooking" just because Hildebeast didn't take off her clothes?

Thanks, but I find the Clinton's machinations more than adequately disturbing when viewed strictly in financial and legal terms.

[quark]

Hellery looking smashing in her Preppy Crusty...not!

[E.G.C.]

BTTT

[OldFriend]

Grifters will do just about anything for money.

Selling out their country is high on the list as it brings in a good amount of cash.

Hiding a donation from the American Muslim Foundation by listing it as American Museum Foundation is another quaint way to lie, cheat and steal.

[DoughtyOne]

There are laws, it's just that the Clintons are above that sort of thing. It was one thing when their justice department looked the other way. It's a lot tougher to take when ours does.

Thanks for the post.

[Mr. Jazzy]

My friend, as we have all seen on previous occasions, when it comes to the Clinton's, it does not matter what the law says, it matters what the judge says.

[paradoxical]

Your post is a thought provoker for me
(as is your tagline)

I am not one for the foil fedora,,,but,,,re:the FBI files.
Why is it the only way liberals win whilst being loosers is to tar and feather conservatives in the legal realm like Delay,Limbaugh,Bennett, etal and now Frist.
How many Rino's are be manipulated,browbeaten or blackmailed?

[JulieRNR21]

Haven't heard much about Hillary's connection to this case from the MSM.

They must just be too busy with DeLay's indictment, Frist's investments and their perpetual Bush bashing.....to cover it.

[Thom Pain]

Remember; Klintoon's FIRST action upon being sworn in in '93 was to terminate ("accept resignation of") ALL Federal prosecutors. ...but I'm not suspicious...