Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TV 'stunts' child brain development
The Press Association ^ | 10/3/05

Posted on 10/06/2005 1:10:36 AM PDT by Crackingham

Watching TV may damage children's brain development leading to increased anti-social behaviour, new research claims. There is also a correlation between the amount of television children watch and the degree of educational damage they suffer, according to the report by Dr Aric Sigman, who is an Associate Fellow of the British Psychological Society. And significant long term damage occurs even at so-called modest levels of viewing - between one and two hours a day, the report, entitled Remotely Controlled, says.

Children now spend more time watching a TV screen than they spend in school, but viewing even a moderate amount can dramatically increase their risk of myopia, slow down their metabolic rate and may trigger premature puberty, according to Dr Sigman. It was also found to lead to a "significantly elevated risk" of sleep problems in adulthood, causing hormone changes, which in turn directly increase appetite and body fat production and damage the immune system leading to a greater vulnerability to cancer,

While the average Briton watches four hours of TV a day, children aged 11-15 spend seven and a half hours a day watching TV and computers - an increase of 40% in a decade -the scientist claims. More than half of three-year-olds have a TV set in their bedrooms and the average six-year-old will have already watched nearly one full year of their lives.

Dr Sigman said: "A 'dose-response relationship' between the amount of television children watch and the degree of educational damage they suffer is now emerging which has 'biological plausibility'.

"Television viewing is also now linked with stunting brain development in the child's frontal lobes leading to reduced impulse control and increased antisocial behaviour.

"Teachers are under pressure to vie for the child's attentional resources which have been damaged by exposure to fast changing screen images. This leaves teachers facing a generation of children who find it more difficult to pay attention and thereby learn but also exhibit poor self-restraint and anti-social behaviour," Dr Sigman added.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brain; duh; education; family; health; televison; toomuchtv; tv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: Paul C. Jesup
Don't kid yourself, that is from the time when the phase "tune and dropout" was created.

“Tune in, turn on, drop out.”

T.V. on, light a joint, forget homework.

Smoking pot and television, such an edifying educational tool...

61 posted on 10/07/2005 4:18:26 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Ha! That's why my kid is homeschooled.

Good call. My kids too.

62 posted on 10/07/2005 7:43:24 AM PDT by JTHomes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
The fact that I choose not to watch means my comments are ignorant?

If you chose to judge something without informing yourself on the subject being judge, then your judgement is in ignorance.

63 posted on 10/07/2005 8:14:21 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

(sarcasm) Yes, your baby boomer generation was so enlightened...


64 posted on 10/07/2005 8:15:45 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
If you chose to judge something without informing yourself on the subject being judge, then your judgement is in ignorance.

And why is it you think I choose not to watch? Hint: I watched TV in the past.

65 posted on 10/07/2005 8:22:32 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
And why is it you think I choose not to watch? Hint: I watched TV in the past.

Define past. How many years ago? A lot of good quality TV shows have come on in the last 15 years or so, most of them are not from ABC, NBC, nor CBS.

66 posted on 10/07/2005 8:42:13 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Bump for later read.


67 posted on 10/07/2005 9:50:21 AM PDT by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion has already been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Define past. How many years ago?

I watched less and less until late 2000, when we sold the TV when we moved and never replaced it.

68 posted on 10/07/2005 10:05:55 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: NewRomeTacitus

http://www.netreach.net/~kaufman/Jerry.Mander.html try this url for starters...


69 posted on 10/07/2005 11:04:45 AM PDT by databoss (WMD's, Syria and North Korea...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Many parents are relying too much on 2-dimensional learning tools instead of 3-dimensional. I would think that these arguments could be held for computers as well, i.e. sitting them in front of a computer screen with learning games for long periods of time.

I agree with you. Children need to outside, need to be reading, need to be playing with their erector set, and they need to be interacting with others.

My children would much rather be outside biking and rollerblading than being inside watching TV.
70 posted on 10/12/2005 8:45:11 AM PDT by devoted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: devoted
I would think that these arguments could be held for computers as well, i.e. sitting them in front of a computer screen with learning games for long periods of time.

Indeed. The '"commercial" aspect of it is not so much, but the mesmerizing effect is the same. The learning is probably beneficial, but the sitting still, starting at the screen is not.

TV ( and video games to an extent) is like carbon monoxide: It's not what the carbon monoxide itself is doing to you, it's what it's PREVENTING you from getting. (Breathing CO replaces oxygen in the blood - the CO doesn't kill you - it's the lack of oxygen).

71 posted on 10/12/2005 8:57:53 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Watching TV may damage children's brain development leading to increased anti-social behaviour, new research claims.


72 posted on 10/12/2005 9:02:25 AM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Thank you for that analogy. I think that is perfect.


73 posted on 10/13/2005 10:42:46 AM PDT by devoted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson