Skip to comments.
Mark Levin and Dick Morris get into it
WABC radio
| October 5, 2005
| Self
Posted on 10/05/2005 12:57:14 PM PDT by jmaroneps37
Mark Levin and Dick morris have just debated the nomination on Sean hannity's show. After listening to Levin, I am more convinced that Miers is the one I want. Levin talks a good game about not wanting judges who will re write the Constitution. We we have a person that all indications show will be an orginalist. I think Levin is more interested in a fight than actually getting the judical "No" machine we need in the Suprems Court. I think Miers will be a solid money in the bank conservative vote. Since Supreme Court Judges only get one vote, how much more could Miers do? Maybe smack Ginsberg in the chops?
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dickmorris; hannity; levin; marklevin; morris; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-308 next last
To: oceanview
"Levin is an expert on these matters."
Yeah, he was part of the crew that gave us O'Connor and Kennedy. Thanks, Mark!
To: RedRover
Harriet Miers is a coin toss. That's not what I want in a Supreme Court nominee. Bingo....This should never have been a questionable decision amongst the base (if the base was even really considered).
I have my doubts, big time.
42
posted on
10/05/2005 1:18:53 PM PDT
by
add925
(The Left = Xenophobes in Denial)
To: TomGuy
If that is all it takes to be an SCJC, we apparently don't expect much.Honest question, for anyone who might know and answer while I google it myself. I didn't know til the other day that Rehnquist had never been a judge before the SC. What qualifications did he bring with him?
43
posted on
10/05/2005 1:18:59 PM PDT
by
agrace
(Where were you when I founded the earth? Tell me if you know so much. Job 38:4)
To: McGavin999
But, jeez Louise, shouldn't a nominee to the Supreme Court at least have merits?
44
posted on
10/05/2005 1:19:10 PM PDT
by
RedRover
To: svcw
I'm just saying what I've seemed to have noticed. Most people I've seen here are hugely disappointed in the pick.
45
posted on
10/05/2005 1:19:17 PM PDT
by
pcottraux
(It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
To: Condor51
Get real.
Read what she has done and said.
Harry Reid is going to regrets his support.
46
posted on
10/05/2005 1:19:32 PM PDT
by
svcw
To: johnny7
47
posted on
10/05/2005 1:19:57 PM PDT
by
chris1
("Make the other guy die for his countary" - George S. Patton)
To: jmaroneps37
Levin sounded like a total whining idiot. I am no fan of Dick "toe sucker" Moris but Levin just kept interupting and made on sense.
48
posted on
10/05/2005 1:20:11 PM PDT
by
truthandlife
("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
To: traderrob6
Don't be fooled, it's just that the "Donner party" is one helluva lot noisier right now. That is a good one ( and so true) still laughing. :)
To: jmaroneps37
I am starting to believe the LEFT wanted a fight more than the conservatives.
Sun Tzu was right. Never fight a battle when you can take the field without the battle.
To: Mike Bates
geez- could there EVER have been a name better made for instant satire than Ruth Buzzi Ginsberg
51
posted on
10/05/2005 1:20:39 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
To: pcottraux
Disappointed is much different than hate her.
52
posted on
10/05/2005 1:20:46 PM PDT
by
svcw
To: oceanview
Yeah, right; that's why when he vetted Kennedy, we wound up with him on the SCOTUS, I suppose.
To: oceanview
Levin is an expert on these matters. he knows the machinations of the court, he understands and can explain why so many republican appointments drift left once they get there.
I read a theory the other day that Tony Snow and Mark Levin are going overboard on their dislike of the Miers nomination because Snow really went to bat for Souter while working for the Bush41 term and got screwed and Levin went to bat for Kennedy and got burned.
I don't know if Levin's arguments are from his knowledge of the mechanisms of the court or the fact that he is skitish on trusting an unknown again
54
posted on
10/05/2005 1:21:13 PM PDT
by
Republican Red
(''Van der Sloot" is Dutch for ''Kennedy.")
To: Soul Seeker
"I've seen very precious little evidence she's an originalist."
have you seen any evidence that would cause you to assume she's not?
To: Soul Seeker
The notion that Miers is an "originalist" is pure spin. As is the notion, popularized by Bush at his presser yesterday, that she was the most qualified available candidate for the High Court.
Risible. Absolutely risible.
Be Seeing you.
Chris
56
posted on
10/05/2005 1:21:55 PM PDT
by
section9
(Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
To: svcw
Okay, you got me. Pardon my strong wording.
57
posted on
10/05/2005 1:22:11 PM PDT
by
pcottraux
(It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
To: nopardons
Kennedy lied during the vetting process. what you are saying is that a person with LESS of a record to be vetted, is a less risky choice. no way.
To: agrace
"What qualifications did he bring with him?"
16 years of private practice in AZ and 3 years in the Nixon Administration. And that was it.
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
"Yeah, he was part of the crew that gave us O'Connor and Kennedy. Thanks, Mark!"
I have a tremendous ammount of repect from Levin, that being said he was the one responsible for vetting Kennedy.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-308 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson