Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush 10/3 Thread (Cheney Will Be On the Rush Limbaugh Show)
Rush Limbaugh show | 10/3/05 | El Rushbo

Posted on 10/03/2005 8:53:59 AM PDT by Rosemont

Maha Rushie


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 441-447 next last
To: Bahbah

The arguments about Terri were far more contentious than I think the ones about Miers ever could be, and we survived that.

From what I heard, the 2000 primaries were fairly contentious.

If someone foolishly poses the argument FR cannot survive this, they have no context of the history of the board.


261 posted on 10/03/2005 10:31:27 AM PDT by Soul Seeker (Barbour/Honore in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: bigeasy_70118
Rush is conveying his own sentiments without taking attribution for them. "People say....", "Some conservatives aren't happy..."; blah, blah blah.
Looks like the one wanting to back down from a fight here is Maha Rushie.

Rush is always humble and respectful before administration officials. It is because of the offices they hold, not agreement with their position. I don't think he is backing down for a moment.

262 posted on 10/03/2005 10:31:38 AM PDT by grassboots.org (I'll Say It Again - The First Freedom is Life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Rush has some ditz on, playing the old Perot card of there is not a dimes worth of difference between the rats and Pubbies.

I don't totally disagree with that statement.

263 posted on 10/03/2005 10:32:02 AM PDT by McGruff (Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
My objection is centered more along the lines I feel there were better qualified candidates. Note- I am not refering to ideology. I am refering to experience and her intellectual contributions to the Courts. In this sense, I feel she is only adequate and that is a disappointment.

As far as I know the only constitutional requirement to be a Supreme Court Justice is to be nominated by the President with the advise and consent of the Senate. She passed the first hurdle today.

Just note that when Nixon nominated Rhenquist, he was viewed by many as not being well qualified either. I'd more concerned, if Bush nominated a seventh grade sceince to teacher to head NASA but being an appeals court judge is not rocket science.

264 posted on 10/03/2005 10:32:14 AM PDT by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Rush had to get a ditz to support his whine.

After all he did tell Vice President Cheney..people are saying.....so he got a person to say......

Count on Rush having the majority calls support his rant.

265 posted on 10/03/2005 10:32:34 AM PDT by OldFriend (One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Allen H
"I am disappointed that so many people here are jumping on this woman and the President when they can't possibly know anything about her."

We do know a little about her.

She gave money to Gore, Bentsen and the DNC. That doesn't sound terribly conservative to me.

She led the TX State Lottery Commission and contributed to Kay Bailey Hutchison That doesn't sound socially conservative to me.

She looks like a political opportunist to me with no real core beliefs. In the end I expect to learn that she is one of Laura Bush's very close friends.
266 posted on 10/03/2005 10:32:43 AM PDT by Preachin' (Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Rush has not attacked this president.

Why can you not accept a person can disagree?


267 posted on 10/03/2005 10:33:25 AM PDT by Soul Seeker (Barbour/Honore in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Yikes...Reid just said that the fact that she voted for Gore makes him feel better....blech...

Of course, he didn't mention that it was in the 80's, NOT against President Bush!!!

Do you get the impression that Harry was a little pale, and not really happy about having to fight with his own party, possibly???? LOL


268 posted on 10/03/2005 10:33:29 AM PDT by Txsleuth (Mike Pence for President of the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

I wonder how much influence the "Super Duper" RINO Senators (Snowe, Collins, Chafee, Hagel, Specter...)had on the decision to nominate Miers?


269 posted on 10/03/2005 10:33:32 AM PDT by Rosemont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
Give the nominee a chance before you take out the guns and HOOT HER DOWN! I didn't do that and I don't think anybody else has either.
270 posted on 10/03/2005 10:33:41 AM PDT by grassboots.org (I'll Say It Again - The First Freedom is Life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: LibWrangler

Pro-life views are not extremist.


271 posted on 10/03/2005 10:33:49 AM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

Donner Party Conservatives


272 posted on 10/03/2005 10:33:50 AM PDT by OldFriend (One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Do we know what cases SCOTUS will be hearing this session?


(Besides Anna Nicole's!)

If Miers is confirmed she is going to plunge right in, of course with Roberts at the helm. I have every confidence in both of them.

She is wearing makeup in her appearance with the President, and that is a sure sign that she is a good conservative (think Cindy Sheehan).


273 posted on 10/03/2005 10:33:56 AM PDT by LibWrangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded
I would have just rather had Luttig or Brown instead of "hoping" that we got a Luttig-Brown type.

There's something else about this that bothers me, more than not knowing her judicial views. And that is the message to all conservative judges that if you show courage at lower court levels, stick your neck out for strict constructionism, you will have no chance for advancement. How many smart, ambitious folks are going to want to issue controversial opinions or work with The Federalist Society if that means no GOP president will nominate you for a higher court? The pressure on the Supreme Court seems to be leftward, Kennedy and OConner didn't start out as weak sisters. I'd rather see someone who has shown they won't be pushed to the left, but that seems to be an automatic disqualification for nomination. Longterm, that can't be good.

274 posted on 10/03/2005 10:34:29 AM PDT by justanotherfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Allen H
I am disappointed that so many people here are jumping on this woman and the President when they can't possibly know anything about her. Sure I wish Bush had put a "Scalia-Thomas" up. But there are tons of people just like them, who aren't even known to be like them. I wish people would be rational enough to see what this lady is like before they throw their hands up and give up. I'd like to have had a fight and put a hard conservative in the rats faces and make them fight, but that didn't happen. So right now, we can either whine and moan like a bunch of old ladies, or we can pray this woman is a real firm conservative, like everyone who knows her has come out and said she is, and support her. She appears to be significantly more conservative than o'conner is, and that's a big win right there.
I agree. I have been reading all of the posts this morning and two real-world issues are not being considered (by those who wanted an in-your-face nomination of a 'known' conservative):

1) The pick needs to be confirmed by a very squishy GOP Senate, and

2) The media will never allow a fair playing field for GWB to wage the battle everyone seems to be itching for.

I have to trust GWB on this one. He's known her for a long time.


275 posted on 10/03/2005 10:34:36 AM PDT by vrwinger (You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Do you get the impression that Harry was a little pale, and not really happy about having to fight with his own party, possibly???? LOL

He couldn't get out of the presser fast enough *L*

276 posted on 10/03/2005 10:34:37 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

The jewish holiday begins at sundown this evening.


277 posted on 10/03/2005 10:34:43 AM PDT by OldFriend (One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Actually the difference is getting smaller and smaller.

The divide is becoming greater between the conservative wing of the pubbies and the moderate wing.

That is where the great divide is.

Sometimes people can't tell the difference between a moderate pubbie and demo rat.

278 posted on 10/03/2005 10:35:02 AM PDT by dts32041 ( Robin Hood, stealing from the government and giving back to tax payer. Where is he today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Preachin'

Guess what???

She and Laura Bush both went to SMU---don't know if they were friends...but that should make you feel worse(?).


279 posted on 10/03/2005 10:35:08 AM PDT by Txsleuth (Mike Pence for President of the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Rosemont

Rush - "If you want to go to war, do you want the Senate Republicans to be your army?"


280 posted on 10/03/2005 10:35:30 AM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 441-447 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson