Posted on 09/29/2005 4:42:21 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
I just cross-linked the threads.
Thanks!
I ahte to say this, but I think that it has little chance in the Senate.
Good point.
We still aren't drilling in ANWR, huh?
At what point do we finally hit the "Emergency" level and get off our butts and do what needs to be done?
When we are shivering in the dark, our tractors sitting idle in fields due to fuel shortages?
This is what the 'Rats have been hoping for. For them to regain power, they pray for BAD things to happen to the US and you can bet your last nickel that they will oppose any and all measures to relieve the current high prices of energy so that it will hurt the economy.
bttt
This simple common-sense assertion is a sight to behold in a Congress infamous for irresponsible thinking and ridiculous reasoning.
The Democrat with a stupid statement about seat belts that isn't worth repeating just does not get it. He think he has the power and moral authority to arbitrarily dictate my behavior, especially in regards to my property. Of course you have to compensate me for preventing me from the use of my property, you imbecile! He is an ugly and evil person.
I doubt that this is large handouts in disguise to property owners. The monetary compensation is the reasonable result of emminent domain protection. It provides a significant disincentive to the government for barring me from the use of my land.
This is an attractive model for zoning law reforms.
And never give one penny to an "environmentalist charity".
bttt
To: National Desk
Contact: Tom Randall of Save Our Species Alliance, 773-857-5086 or trandall@winningreen.com
GOLDEN, Colo., Sept. 29 /U.S. Newswire/ -- With Democrats contributing 36 "yes" votes, the U.S. House passed the first substantive improvements in the Endangered Species Act since it first became law 31 years ago.
The measure, the Threatened and Endangered Species Recovery Act (TESRA) was the culmination of an effort, led by Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo (R-CA), and Dennis Cardoza (D- CA) to improve the recovery rate of endangered and threatened species while making the process fairer for landowners.
"During the debate, the entire House of Representatives seemed to agree the ESA is in need of updates and improvements," Pombo said. It's incredible how far we have come.
"What surprised me most today," Pombo added, "was the strong ideological differences about whether or not homeowners should be compensated when their property is taken, as the fifth amendment of the Constitution requires. Upholding this right and partnering with the landowner is the only way we are going to improve the ESA's failing result for recovery. This legislation does just that."
Pombo noted that during the life of the 31-year-old Act just 10 of approximately 1300species listed as threatened or endangered have recovered sufficiently to be de-listed.
Major improvements made by TESRA include mandatory requirements for science-based recovery plans when a species is listed as threatened or endangered. It also provides for incentives for voluntary conservation efforts by private property owners and compensation for value lost from restrictions on land use. Some criticized compensating landowners as being too costly but the Congressional Budget Office predicted those costs would be quite modest.
http://www.usnewswire.com/
ooops forgot the list...
A re-write is overdue. Let's hope it's a good one.
Some news stories on abuses by environemnetalists:
http://www.neoperspectives.com/environment.htm
'Ranchers revenge' and the jumping mouse one (it didn't exist!) are good.
Was it Siskiyou county where the lady went to jail for feeding deer or some critter?
We shall see . . . this is the same gang that couldn't even muster the courage to take PBS off the taxpayer tit, much less the Sierra Club.
It was the definition of "take" that exceeded both our treaty obligations and the Congress' legitimate Constitutional authority, all protestations of the SCOTUS to the contrary.
Senate won't even look at it until next year and this version doesn't have a prayer.
Amazingly, Democrats actually approved eliminating critical habitat in another House version.
We paid good money for Alaska. The least we should do is get our moneys worth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.