Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thoughtomator

For those who want help getting the context of the Able Danger story, I have worked diligently for weeks keeping an up to date Able Danger blogroll at:
www.qtmonster.com


4 posted on 09/17/2005 9:59:45 PM PDT by vadkins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: vadkins

Good work! Able Danger is not going to be for the weak of mind. The timeline is going to be critical.

Especially, after the report in NYPost about a possible AlQaeda attack in Yemen: i.e.: The USS Cole three weeks before the bombing.

I still want to see how the timeline of Sandy Burglar and his pants fit into all this with the 911 Commission/Able Danger.


13 posted on 09/17/2005 10:24:40 PM PDT by NavySEAL F-16 (Proud to be a Reagan Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: vadkins

Link:

For those who want help getting the context of the Able Danger story, I have worked diligently for weeks keeping an up to date Able Danger blogroll at:

http://www.qtmonster.com

Links on the left sidebar.


19 posted on 09/17/2005 10:59:59 PM PDT by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: vadkins

About a month ago, I was listening to an interview of somebody who wrote a biography about Hillary. It wasn't Morris; I believe the guy was a Liberal NYT columnist, who’s taken a lot of flak for his book on Clinton.

When asked about Able Danger and a Hillary connection, he responded he wasn't familiar with the details because it hadn't come up until after he researched and wrote his book. But he did insinuate the operation was similar to something that would have come out of the Clinton's "War Room" which was headed up by Hillary. He also explained how much of the documentation from the "War Room" was destroyed before the Clintons left the White House, which would explain why there's not much evidence of the Able Danger project.

Of course this is all supposition but it does follow a pattern of the Clintons.


34 posted on 09/18/2005 5:08:20 AM PDT by Fearless Flyers (Proud to be of The Brave and the Free, http://fearless-flyers.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: vadkins

When the civilian contractor tried to deliver his research it was refused because it contained information about US citizens. This would have been after Travel-gate had come to light.

But if the Clintons set up the project from the “War Room” to use the military resouces, I believe they would’ve found a way to retrieve the contractor’s research in a less formal manner. It’s likely after retrieving the information they would not have paid attention to the threats on National Security. Though that would have been the official line for setting up Able Danger, the unofficial reason would have taken priority; to gather intelligence on political enemies of the Administration, and the National Security threats would fall under the radar.

This theory follows the Clinton Administration model, which was distracted from the business of government by political posturing and totally inept in manners of National Security.


41 posted on 09/18/2005 5:45:57 AM PDT by Fearless Flyers (Proud to be of The Brave and the Free, http://fearless-flyers.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: vadkins

"For those who want help getting the context of the Able Danger story, I have worked diligently for weeks keeping an up to date Able Danger blogroll at:
www.qtmonster.com"

Thanks for blog link, shall bookmark.


66 posted on 09/18/2005 2:49:49 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson