Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUDGE ROBERTS PICTURE ON REUTERS/YAHOO (BARF ALERT -REFERENCED BY RUSH)
Reuters/Yahoo ^ | 9/13/05 | Reuters/Yahoo

Posted on 09/13/2005 12:21:58 PM PDT by NYC Republican

Supreme Court Chief Justice nominee Judge John Roberts listens to a question from Senator Joe Biden (D-DE) during the second day of his confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington September 13, 2005


(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alreuters; appallingdems; caption; johnroberts; mediabias; reuters; yahoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last
To: fullchroma
I do wish Roberts would dispense with what must be uncomfortable, blink-inducing contact lenses and don a pair of glasses.

I'm not sure if its contacts that make him blink, could be all the lighting aimed at him.

Bush (and Gore and also Kerry) all wore/wear contacts, and none of them have the eyeblinks like crazy unless looking directly into lights.

Sidenote: Every single US president, from Washington to the current Bush has worn glasses (or contacts in public).

101 posted on 09/13/2005 2:15:34 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican

I went to Yahoo and looked at the photos. There are 167 of them and this is the very worst possible one they could have picked. Its not even a picture!


102 posted on 09/13/2005 2:16:21 PM PDT by beckysueb (God bless America and President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
The one they had earlier was a close up were he looked totally perplexed and scared.  It was cropped so all you basically saw was his eyes, nose & mouth.  The look on his face made him appear to be getting ready to yell "Mommy, help me, I don't know what I am doing"  Extremely unflattering and disrepectful.  They've changed it since then.
103 posted on 09/13/2005 2:21:21 PM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican

Most everyone looks the same way when they realize the Senators speaking "run" the country.


104 posted on 09/13/2005 2:24:04 PM PDT by N. Theknow (Be a glowworm. A glowworm's never glum. How can you be grumpy when the sun shines out your bum?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy_Cin
They are Vile ~ I remember all during the 2004 election year AOL, Yahoo, AP, & my stinking local paper would print the most horrible distorted pictures of Powell, Condi, Rummy & Bush. It was almost a daily event~! Anyone who doesn't think the average idiot in the MSM isn't bias is either blind or delusional. IMHO

My local paper posted a photoshopped picture of Bush 41 and Bush 43, grinning broadly, dressed in fishing clothes, carrying fishing gear, with 41 holding up a fish with them placed in the middle of a flooded NO street. The caption said "of course this picture is doctored. Bush wouldn't be that insensitive." But there was sarcasm intended cause it was posted by the editor who is always slamming Bush in his editorials. Disgusting.

105 posted on 09/13/2005 2:31:42 PM PDT by beckysueb (God bless America and President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb

That pic's being circulated all over. How disgusting. How insensitive


106 posted on 09/13/2005 2:53:20 PM PDT by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican

107 posted on 09/13/2005 3:29:46 PM PDT by beaelysium (Paradise is always where love dwells.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: beaelysium

Sorry, none of these images come close to exposing just how biased, and hateful, this picture is. Reuters has NO shame whatsoever.


108 posted on 09/13/2005 3:37:02 PM PDT by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
 

Sorry, none of these images come close to exposing just how biased, and hateful, this picture is. Reuters has NO shame whatsoever.

alt
But they are so much fun to post: )

109 posted on 09/13/2005 3:44:31 PM PDT by beaelysium (Paradise is always where love dwells.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican

I like that picture. That is how a person of intelligence should react to the words of Schumer, Kennedy and Biden.


110 posted on 09/13/2005 3:58:56 PM PDT by M1911A1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican; All
And now a word from our real Sponsors of Free Speech

The Men and Women who serve,
and have served, our country
are the ones who make sure that
the Politicans and Judges are free to do their job.

We would not have a US Supreme Court
without the protection of the Military.

Politicans and Judges are safe
because of the Military who protect them.
Send a Thank You while you enjoy your Freedom also.


Click on a service emblem to send an online
Thank You to a service man or woman in any branch.
U.S. Arny U.S. Navy U.S. Marines U.S. Air Force U.S. Coast Guard
Army
Navy
Marines
Air Force
Coast
Guard

"This is from me to those that have not written yet, please write, use it,
tell about your family, your hobbies, how the weather is, what are you planning for the weekend.
Tell a funny thing that happened, send a joke anything. Tell about your pets and kids.
We miss home and it means a lot to hear from everyone."

From a US Marine's e-mail


Will You help keep the Candle Lit for our service men and women?
Can you spare a few moments today to either
e-mail them or learn about sending packages to them?
Many of them are away from home for the 1st time.
PLEASE Click on the graphic and help cheer them up.
You will stay right where you are on this thread while you write them.

111 posted on 09/13/2005 4:14:13 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Have you said Thank You to a service man or woman today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
What can we do about Reuters? No pretense here. . .they prefer our enemies. And want to make the case 'for' them.

It's just not the news; anymore. . .

112 posted on 09/13/2005 5:46:12 PM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; Timesink

Not sure if you saw this disgraceful display from the MSM.


113 posted on 09/13/2005 7:31:50 PM PDT by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican; All

http://www.ace.mu.nu/archives/119477.php

Ace of Spades parody of day 2. Hysterical.


114 posted on 09/14/2005 4:17:31 AM PDT by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
Hey, I'd need toothpicks to keep my eyes open during all the bloviating by 'Rat senators.

So true! I caught part of Leahy's opening statement, where he covered slavery, women's right to vote, etc.-- you know, all those issues coming up for decision this term-- and it occurred to me that Judge Roberts not only has to practice his statement, but his "interested" and "alert" look for the other statements. Frankly, I think the Democrats ought to stay away from slavery discussion anyway, since at one time that was upheld by the Supreme Court, too.

115 posted on 09/14/2005 4:21:07 AM PDT by GraceCoolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb
As angry as it makes me let the MSM continue to show themselves for the adolescent ASSES they are.
Just like the senate Democrats LOL
116 posted on 09/14/2005 6:34:53 AM PDT by Cindy_Cin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
...the MSM would never, never, NEVER post an unflattering pic of Hillary. They would never pull this kind of photo stunt with a prominent Democrat.

I agree with you but have to point out that the Washington Times photos of Hillary Clinton (at least during the Clinton administration) nearly always were what could charitably be described as "unflattering." I suspected their photo editor had little love for her. Some of them were downright funny.

117 posted on 09/14/2005 11:22:51 AM PDT by GraceCoolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6

NICE! Thanks


118 posted on 09/14/2005 9:13:57 PM PDT by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson