1 posted on
09/08/2005 3:40:24 PM PDT by
RDTF
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: RDTF
Just saw this on ABC news...they are taking guns away from Americans in their own homes! And I'm not talking about gang members. This doesn't sit well with me.
2 posted on
09/08/2005 3:41:56 PM PDT by
TXBubba
( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
To: RDTF
"Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons," he said. What??
I thought there was no declaration of marshal law?
3 posted on
09/08/2005 3:42:01 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: RDTF
So, there is no Second Amendment in New Orleans?
4 posted on
09/08/2005 3:42:27 PM PDT by
Choose Ye This Day
("When it's not easy pickings, they'll go somewhere else." -- NO property owner)
To: RDTF
Not good. Not good at all.
5 posted on
09/08/2005 3:42:29 PM PDT by
wysiwyg
(What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
To: RDTF
6 posted on
09/08/2005 3:42:48 PM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: RDTF
"including legally registered firearms," ESPECIALLY registered firearms!
7 posted on
09/08/2005 3:43:13 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: RDTF
What was that Charleton Heston said, "out of my cold dead hands?"
To: RDTF
Things must be proceeding nicely if this is the worst the NYSlimes can make it sound.
9 posted on
09/08/2005 3:43:37 PM PDT by
crazyhorse691
( Heaven on Earth is where the nearest Starbucks is 60 miles away.)
To: RDTF
Time for a cold dead hand uprising or something, this is nuts.
To: RDTF
including legally registered firearms, from civilians in preparation for a mass forced evacuation of the residents still living here.
If Eddie Compass was Ecru, they would be calling for him to resign.
those are the guns they are taking.
La has the concealed gun law that allows people to carry guns.
The police state has begun.
11 posted on
09/08/2005 3:43:54 PM PDT by
rineaux
(hardcore)
To: RDTF
Wait a minuite, stop the presses, the NYT is coming out supporting a pro firearm stance!
12 posted on
09/08/2005 3:44:05 PM PDT by
stockpirate
(We can fight the Muslim Army in Iraq! Or we can fight them outback! Check my homepage)
To: RDTF
No civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns, or other firearms, said P. Edwin Compass, the superintendent of police. The criminals will be happy. However, if ever a place warranted martial law, NOs at this time does.
13 posted on
09/08/2005 3:44:14 PM PDT by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
To: RDTF
So you can bear arms to protect someone else's property, but not your own? If someone hires armed guards to protect their house, do they still go to the house and confiscate the owner's weapons?
20 posted on
09/08/2005 3:46:38 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: RDTF
1. Notice it's the locals who did this, not the feds.
2. It disproportionately affects the poor and middle and even upper-middle class -- those who would protect their own property and cannot afford private security and don't trust the police to protect their property (wisely).
3. The upper class and businesses that can afford private security can still protect their property by hiring armed guards.
THIS SUCKS, BIG TIME!!!
23 posted on
09/08/2005 3:47:53 PM PDT by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
To: RDTF
27 posted on
09/08/2005 3:49:39 PM PDT by
Vaquero
(a red stater trapped in the body of a blue state.)
To: RDTF; AnnaZ; MineralMan
AnnaZ...if this report is accurate, sadly you may have been spot on with the earlier reoprt.
If they are confiscating weapons from peaceful, legal citizens in their own homes...this is wrong and must not be tolerated.
As I said before, if an individual is well provisioned and can take care of themselves, if they are on dry ground, then they have every right to be armed on their own property and to defend said property against looters and criminals.
Plain and simple...end of story.
During the course of the emergency if the authorities want to say that no citizen can be on a public street carrying...I can live with that. But to go to the extent of confiscating private citizen's weapons from their homes...that is a step too far.
29 posted on
09/08/2005 3:50:47 PM PDT by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: RDTF
police officers began confiscating weapons, including legally registered firearms, from civilians in preparation for a mass forced evacuation of the residents still living here. If they are still in NO then they are law breakers, lawbreakers should not be armed.
To: Darlin'
This will be the end of the DemonRat party in Louisiana.
Almost everyone is armed and will hold a grudge.
So9
To: RDTF
We now have the example we need whenever undecideds say gungrabbing "can't happen here."
This is obscene.
46 posted on
09/08/2005 3:56:09 PM PDT by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg. Gosh I miss her!)
To: SevenDaysInMay; Travis McGee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson