Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wash. man says he killed child rapists
AP ^ | 9/6/5

Posted on 09/06/2005 7:50:10 AM PDT by SmithL

BELLINGHAM, Wash. - A man turned himself in to authorities in the killing of two convicted child rapists, saying he picked the victims from a sheriff's Web site, police said.

Michael Anthony Mullen, 36, called 911 on Monday to claim responsibility for the killings, and officers who talked to him said he gave information that only the killer would know, according to a police news release. He was jailed for investigation of two counts of first-degree murder.

Hank Eisses, 49, and Victor Vasquez, 68, were found shot to death at their apartment Aug. 27. They were both classified as Level III sex offenders, considered the type most likely to reoffend. Sex offenders in Washington are required to register with local authorities, and the information is provided on the Web.

Mullen told authorities he targeted at least one of the two men after checking the county sheriff's Web site July 13, according to the police statement.

The bodies of Eisses and Vasquez were found by a roommate, also a sex offender. He said a man wearing a blue jumpsuit and a cap that said FBI on it came to their home, told them he was an FBI agent and said one of them was on a "hit list" on an Internet site, police said.

The roommate said he left while the "FBI" visitor was still there and found the bodies when he returned about four hours later.

Days after the killings, The Bellingham Herald received an unsigned letter claiming responsibility for the killings. Police notified convicted Level 3 sex offenders in the area as a precaution, but said the letter was vague and could be a hoax.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: childmolestors; execution; terminator; vigilantism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-324 next last
To: SmithL
What this man did was wrong. Plain and simple.

That information is there to allow parents know who is in the area and may be a potential harm to there children.

By using this information to commit a crime, it may result in this information no longer being freely available.

41 posted on 09/06/2005 8:06:38 AM PDT by tonycavanagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

As the father of three beautiful children, who enjoy many of the wonderful parks in Bellingham. I feel a wee bit safer with these scumbags gone.

OTOH, it is hard to sympathize with the killer, unless his own kids were targeted by the recently deceased.


42 posted on 09/06/2005 8:06:39 AM PDT by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000
This is bad because now Washington State will most likely remove that info from the site. We all know this is a very good possibility.

Yes dammit. I have hundreds in my zip code, and have looked at every photo, haven't seen any on the street, but I find it valuable to know anyway.

43 posted on 09/06/2005 8:07:23 AM PDT by null and void (Does my life *really* need a sarcasm tag????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Too bad i can't be on his jury...he's never
get convicted.

PLEAD NOT GUILTY!!!!


44 posted on 09/06/2005 8:07:23 AM PDT by NickatNite2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Exactly. They've already paid for their crimes, and while they "might" reoffend, they might not either. It was not up to this guy to make that judgement.

We are a nation of laws, people; you may not like the rules but you cannot take it upon yourself to break them. If you want rule changes, vote for the folks who'll change them.

45 posted on 09/06/2005 8:07:36 AM PDT by Junior (Just because the voices in your head tell you to do things doesn't mean you have to listen to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000
Exactly what I said.

Oops, sorry. Good job. I scanned the comments quickly for any mention of Megan and when I didn't see it, posted... Anyway, I'm in 100% agreement with you! If the courts handled these cases as they should've been handled, there wouldn't be any need for Megan's law. And if libs want to repeal Megan, they'd better address that first, as far as I'm concerned.

46 posted on 09/06/2005 8:07:48 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
There goes Megan's law.

Convicted Sex Offender registries do not make a lot of sense to me. Such registries are an acknowledgement that individuals on the list are a danger to society. I say if they are a danger to society never release them back into society. This guy in Washington did what the justice system should have done.

47 posted on 09/06/2005 8:07:49 AM PDT by LongViewSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000
I'd rather have them alive and known then two dead and the info gone.

They were not in custody which means they were an immediate danger to children. Why sacrifice more children to these predators? There is no such thing as a reformed sex offender so they need to be in jail or dead.

48 posted on 09/06/2005 8:07:53 AM PDT by msnimje (CNN - Constant Negative Nonsense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LongViewSC
Amen! We should start a letter writting campaign calling on Bush to issue a pardon.

Codswallop. This guy premeditatedly killed two people in cold blood.

Just because you don't like the victems, you should not condone such an evil act.

If you laud this act, where does it stop? How about abortion doctors? jaywalkers?

Murder is murder. This guy should be hammered to the full extent of the law.

49 posted on 09/06/2005 8:07:59 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

No one can argue with you: murder is indeed murder. However, not all killings are murders.


50 posted on 09/06/2005 8:09:40 AM PDT by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (Washington State--Land of Court-approved Voting Fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Too bad we couldn't convince OJ to do this. He never gets put in jail when he kills people.


51 posted on 09/06/2005 8:10:07 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongViewSC

Agreed. It's like having a Serial Killer Registry. I'm just sorry he turned himself in.


52 posted on 09/06/2005 8:10:54 AM PDT by Millee (Earth First! We'll log the other planets later!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Honestly, I praise the man for taking out two of the most dangerous and vile kind of humans on this earth, however, he did break the law and must be punished. This is such difficult case morally. Oh well, give him probation :)


53 posted on 09/06/2005 8:11:11 AM PDT by Alex Marko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Nope! Justifable Homicide under the 'Good Samaritan Law'.


54 posted on 09/06/2005 8:11:26 AM PDT by NickatNite2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This is really bad news. The ACLU will be all over this, as they should be. First order of business: no more publicly available information of registered sex offenders.


55 posted on 09/06/2005 8:11:32 AM PDT by manwiththehands (If the Left offends you, stick around. They are just getting started.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Ok, let me state that of course, ridding the world of these two scumbags is not the worst thing that has happened recently, but I digress...

What posessed this guy to go do this? To hunt them down and kill them. I could see if these guys had victimized his own children, but just doing this by picking a couple of guys off the Sheriffs website? This guy must have issues, I'll bet he was molested or raped when he was a kid..

56 posted on 09/06/2005 8:11:49 AM PDT by Paradox (Just because we are not perfect, does not mean we are not good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The families of these two fine men will now sue the county, City and State for posting those names. They will probably win a large settlement AND force the list to go away.

The victims of these two fine men will never be properly compensated, but they will sleep a little better knowing that these two fine men are now rotting in hell.

The guy that killed these two fine men will have to be punished for doing the job that the courts in the City, County and State failed to do.
57 posted on 09/06/2005 8:12:06 AM PDT by mad puppy ( The Southern border needs to be a MAJOR issue in 2006 and 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
I hope most are in jest.

Unfortunately not.

58 posted on 09/06/2005 8:12:07 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

The problem is that the law is broken in the first place, that child rapists are out on the streets. That's the bigger issue that needs to be solved.

Vigilante action is the result of our legal system not producing justice.


59 posted on 09/06/2005 8:12:08 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Gentlemen may cry, "Peace! Peace!" -- but there is no peace. - Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Hermit
A paradox...I can't decide whether to slap him on the back or slap him in prison.

I have to agree. On one hand, I'm glad these child-preying demonic jackals are no longer a threat to anyone anymore and can no longer put an innocent child through this kind of hellish nightmare.

On the other hand, he took the law into his own hands and committed murder. I would have trouble deciding what to do with him.
60 posted on 09/06/2005 8:12:12 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Proud member of the 21st century Christian Crusaders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-324 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson