Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to Nominate Roberts for Chief Justice
FoxNews ^ | Sept 5, 2005

Posted on 09/05/2005 4:39:35 AM PDT by TomGuy

Newsreaders on FoxNews just said a 'Senior administration spokesman' has said Bush plans to nominate Roberts for Chief Justice position.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chiefjustice; johnroberts; judgeroberts; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 541 next last
To: TomGuy

This is a BIG mistake he should have nominated Janice Rodges Brown to the chief spot or promoted Scalia or Thomas and put Rodgers in their spot.

I just don't trust Roberts enough for Chief Justice.


161 posted on 09/05/2005 5:46:38 AM PDT by Texas_Conservative2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

...Now if Roberts turns out to be another William Rehnquist, conservatives have nothing to worry about....

That's a mighty big IF.

He may just as easily be the next Souter.


162 posted on 09/05/2005 5:46:54 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google CFR North American Community)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: College Repub

While I would have liked to see Scalia in the position, this will leave for sure Thomas and Scalia as conservatives on the court and allow Bush to appoint another conservative. I guess it just fills the positions faster, given the road blocks the liberal dem's constantly throw up.


163 posted on 09/05/2005 5:47:51 AM PDT by southernindymom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Conservative2
I just don't trust Roberts enough for Chief Justice.

Hell, I barely trust him enough for associate justice.

164 posted on 09/05/2005 5:47:57 AM PDT by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster; leadpenny; rightwing2; Squantos; Jeff Head
If I remember from civics classes; the chief justice assigns associate justices to review various cases and also assigns who will author the opinions for decisions, both the concurring and dissenting. I for one do not want a Ginsberg or Souter assigning cases for review.

Roberts was a part of the Rehnquist circle of associates and knows how he went through the decision process in assigning cases. A Roberts court will probably mirror a Rehnquist court in most regards.
165 posted on 09/05/2005 5:48:24 AM PDT by SLB ("We must lay before Him what is in us, not what ought to be in us." C. S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

One DUmp went, "if we don't remove these men, physically, and very soon, then...us all."


166 posted on 09/05/2005 5:48:24 AM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

He clerked for Rehnquist. I would bet that President Bush and Justice Rehnquist have had some conversation about this move.


167 posted on 09/05/2005 5:50:55 AM PDT by maica (Do not believe the garbage the media is feeding you back home. ---Allegra (in Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
I wish the President would make another nomination right away because the slim conservative plurality on the Courts is gone.

Well actually if Roberts is as conservative as Rennquest who he is a clone of (held same jobs in government and worked for Rennquest) then the court remains unchanged from before O'Connor announced her retirement. O'Connor will remain on the court until her replacement is approved. The other nominee who ever it is will add a more reliable conservative to the bench

168 posted on 09/05/2005 5:51:48 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: LS

The court makes their own rules, just like the congress, the chief can have as much power as the majority on the court want him to have.

The court can even force judges to resign.


169 posted on 09/05/2005 5:52:02 AM PDT by Texas_Conservative2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

It's the only way to have a full 9 judges by october.


170 posted on 09/05/2005 5:53:00 AM PDT by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mware

That photo is priceless!


171 posted on 09/05/2005 5:53:00 AM PDT by Rebelbase ("Run Hillary Run" bumper stickers. Liberals place on rear bumper, conservatives put on front bumper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Dave S

As my husband asked, is there a black, hispanic woman out there Bush can appoint? That will make all the factions happy.


172 posted on 09/05/2005 5:53:25 AM PDT by southernindymom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

So what kind of power over the SC does the CSC justice hold?


173 posted on 09/05/2005 5:53:28 AM PDT by Getsmart64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

Who are some of the RED MEAT type picks Bush can choose for AJ?

Luttig?


174 posted on 09/05/2005 5:53:36 AM PDT by KavMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: southernindymom

Janice Brown fits that bill.


175 posted on 09/05/2005 5:53:54 AM PDT by mware (Atlantic County, NJ Heart of the Pinelands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
And the winner is...Edith Clement. Not only is she a woman, she was runner-up last time and ... she is from New Orleans

Ooohh
176 posted on 09/05/2005 5:54:03 AM PDT by visualops (www.visualops.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: maica
That is how lots of us dress our children and grandchildren here on the East Coast.

I can tell you this, I have old 8mm movies where in 1965 I'm wearing the same exact outfit that kids wearing and my Mom looks just like Jaquelyn Kenndy with pillsbury box hat and everything.

177 posted on 09/05/2005 5:54:06 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Words Mean Things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
I fear that Gonzales will be Bush's ice cream sundae.

This is a BIG fear. If President Bush picks Gonzales we need to worry very much. First it will prove that he really doesn't understand what American Conservatism is all about and second we would immediately begin to fret (even more) about the Roberts nomination. This would IMO send Conservatives into an angry feeling of betrayal and hopelessness.

178 posted on 09/05/2005 5:54:12 AM PDT by Archon of the East ("universal executive power of the law of nature")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
If true, this makes some sense. Roberts is clearly going to sail through confirmation and he has no real track record on the Court for senators to poke at the way they would with Scalia or Thomas.

Roberts had better be the right man if he's going to be CJ.
179 posted on 09/05/2005 5:54:26 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware

works for me!!!! I liked her too.


180 posted on 09/05/2005 5:55:23 AM PDT by southernindymom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 541 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson