Skip to comments.
Victims may have died before crash( Passengers frozen solid! )
CNN ^
| 08/15/2005
| CNN
Posted on 08/15/2005 8:47:22 AM PDT by devane617
ATHENS, Greece (CNN) -- Investigators were working to determine why a Cypriot plane apparently suffered a catastrophic loss of cabin pressure and slammed into a Greek mountain -- possibly with all 121 people on board already dead. All but two of the bodies have been recovered, a Greek government spokesman said Monday, and officials hope autopsies and cockpit recorders will hold clues to Sunday's crash of Helios Airways Flight 522. The autopsies were ordered to determine if the 115 passengers and six crew were already dead or oxygen-starved before the crash, the spokesman said. A Greek Defense Ministry source with access to the investigation told Reuters that most of the bodies recovered were "frozen solid."
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: air; aircraft; airplane; boeing737; heliosairways; terror; terrorist; travel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 221-234 next last
To: Heatseeker
If the plane was on autopilot at 35,000 feet, what would explain its descent to less than 10,000 feet in under an hour? If it wasn't on autopilot, could it have maintained altitude and heading as it appears to have done for an hour and a half? IANAP, but something's looking very strange here.
101
posted on
08/15/2005 9:33:29 AM PDT
by
Bob
To: mewzilla
102
posted on
08/15/2005 9:34:11 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: devane617
"Bush prolly made the airlines hire low wage illegals..."
Lets not give the POTUS or the airlines any ideas, huh?
103
posted on
08/15/2005 9:34:22 AM PDT
by
trubluolyguy
(Well, why did you pull a gun on me if you didn't want to have sex?)
To: mewzilla
as far as aerospace goes, the French aren't too bad... They do run the Airbus consortium...
104
posted on
08/15/2005 9:34:55 AM PDT
by
Zavien Doombringer
(Have you gotten your Viking Kittie Patch today? http://www.visualops.com/patch.html)
To: Zavien Doombringer
Been through there many a time. I think some of our Kelly crew chiefs got moved there for a while during the first Gulf war. Good cheese-steak sandwiches on the flight line.
105
posted on
08/15/2005 9:34:59 AM PDT
by
Jonx6
To: mewzilla
Thanks! I'm no pilot, but isn't that a little high for a short haul? Nope. The planes are designed to operate at altitude. They get out of the thick air ASAP.
106
posted on
08/15/2005 9:35:15 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: mewzilla
Wonder how Boeing feels about the French doing the analysis? LOL. "We find that the crash was due to equipment failure, which would have been prevented had the airline purchased from Airbus".
107
posted on
08/15/2005 9:35:34 AM PDT
by
Heatseeker
("I sort of like liberals now. They’re kind of cute when they’re shivering and afraid." - Ann Coulter)
To: Zavien Doombringer
They do run the Airbus consortium...Yeah, I know :)
108
posted on
08/15/2005 9:35:47 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: r9etb
I wasn't thinking capability as much as expense. Doesn't it cost more to fly higher for longer?
109
posted on
08/15/2005 9:36:23 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: wildwood
YES!
If there was NO OXYGEN and the pilots were passed out cold, how were others able to function in the cockpit?
I too found that strange.
After 9-11, I suspect ANY plane crash to be terrorism until it is COMPLETELY ruled out MONTHS LATER by ALL the information available.
110
posted on
08/15/2005 9:37:31 AM PDT
by
Muzzle_em
(I'm an island awash in a sea of stupidity)
To: Kelly_2000
this is what i was referring to:
Greek Defense Ministry officials said 90 minutes elapsed between the alert being raised at 10:30 a.m. and the plane crashing at 12:03 p.m.
Greek government spokesman Theodore Roussopoulos said F-16 pilots sent to investigate reported that with the pilots out of action there may have been a last-gasp effort by others on the plane to bring it back under control.
"The F-16s saw two individuals in the cockpit seemingly trying to regain control of the airplane," Roussoupoulos told reporters. It was not known if they were passengers or other crew.
"The F-16s also saw oxygen masks down when they got close to the aircraft. The aircraft was making continuous right-hand turns to show it had lost radio contact."
this does not seem to make sense to me, though i know very little about it.
To: Boundless
decompression is the sudden loss of cabin pressure. NOt a slow leak. As long as the AC system is running you have a form of pressurization.
The only way a sudden loss of pressure can occur is if a hole suddenly appeared. When we test cabin pressure, we have allowable leakage, no cabin is air tight, close but not all tight.
A small leak would only have an effect in flight, if the AC system was turned off. or the Cabin Pressure regulator was stuck open. Usualluy it is failed to closed.
112
posted on
08/15/2005 9:38:39 AM PDT
by
Zavien Doombringer
(Have you gotten your Viking Kittie Patch today? http://www.visualops.com/patch.html)
To: mewzilla
Doesn't it cost more to fly higher for longer?Nope, air is thinner up there, takes less fuel to fly fast. Fuel=Money.
113
posted on
08/15/2005 9:38:49 AM PDT
by
Paradox
(Budweiser, fighting for the Right to Keep and Beer Arms.)
To: Bob
If the plane was on autopilot at 35,000 feet, what would explain its descent to less than 10,000 feet in under an hour? No idea, but others have speculated that the passengers trying to take it off auto and fly it manually might do it. In fact I wonder what the limit of control is for modern autopilots if you have a mob of passengers suddenly surge to the very front of the airframe.
114
posted on
08/15/2005 9:38:52 AM PDT
by
Heatseeker
("I sort of like liberals now. They’re kind of cute when they’re shivering and afraid." - Ann Coulter)
To: Jonx6
Man, I miss the infight kitchen...Box nasty anyone :)
115
posted on
08/15/2005 9:39:56 AM PDT
by
Zavien Doombringer
(Have you gotten your Viking Kittie Patch today? http://www.visualops.com/patch.html)
To: mewzilla
I wasn't thinking capability as much as expense. Doesn't it cost more to fly higher for longer? No, it costs less. Less air = less drag, for example, especially at the normal cruising speed.
116
posted on
08/15/2005 9:40:18 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: July 4th
"In order to descend from 30,000 feet safely to a breathable 10 or 11,000 feet, I think it takes roughly 4 minutes. So I think there must have been something else going on. The crew might have had bad oxygen, or the decompression was so sudden that it caused instant shock and disorientation, not allowing enough time for the pilots to properly secure masks."
You can breathe well above 11,000 feet; I don't think breathing is dangerously impaired until 18-20,000 feet. People around here climb Mt. Rainier without oxygen, and it's 14,000 feet.
It seems that if something catastrophically decompressed the plane, that the plane would have broken up in flight. I'm wondering if some toxic fumes entered the ventilation system and knocked everyone out before they had time to realize what was happening.
To: Paradox
We knew at least one person onboard was lucid enough to send a text message....but no others? And we're assuming that the real owner was sending the message. WHOMEVER operated it could have just picked a name....and sent them a message.
The circumstances of this crash are very confusing. Who was onboard?? Anyone extraordinary?
118
posted on
08/15/2005 9:41:09 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Paradox; r9etb
119
posted on
08/15/2005 9:42:03 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Steve_Seattle
It seems that if something catastrophically decompressed the plane, that the plane would have broken up in flight. I'm wondering if some toxic fumes entered the ventilation system and knocked everyone out before they had time to realize what was happening. The last time I flew on an Airbus, the interior air began smelling strongly (to me) of paraffin wax (jet fuel combustion byproduct type of smell I guess). It seems I was the only one whom it bothered, but then I have a very sensitive nose.
120
posted on
08/15/2005 9:42:37 AM PDT
by
Paradox
(Budweiser, fighting for the Right to Keep and Beer Arms.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 221-234 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson