Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dog Rips Child From Mother Arms (Rottweiller Kills Girl)
KABC TV 7, Los Angeles ^ | August 2, 2004

Posted on 08/03/2005 10:19:25 AM PDT by Travis McGee

Dog Rips Child From Mother Arms

GLENDALE — A Rottweiller ripped a toddler out of her mother's arms in Glendale, dragged the child up a driveway and mauled her to death, police said today.

The dog, which belongs to the victim's grandparents, pulled the child from her mother's arms about 7 last night in the 2300 block of Via Saldivar, said Sherri Servillo, a Glendale Police Department spokeswoman.

The infant was taken to a hospital, where she was pronounced dead, Servillo said.

The woman was housesitting for the child's grandparents, Servillo said, adding authorities received a "hysterical 911 call" after the attack.

The dog is being held by Pasadena Animal Control, she said.

The woman holding the child was also holding a hose and watering a lawn when the 150-pound Rottweiler attacked, said Glendale police Sgt. Tom Lorenz, calling it a "horrific and tragic incident" that has shocked crime scene investigators.

He said the dog dragged the infant several feet down the driveway before mauling her. The mother suffered no major injuries.

After being notified of the attack, Glendale police officers went to the place where the victim's father works in Pasadena and drove him to the hospital where his child was pronounced dead, police said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: baddogcarl; believethemsm; blitheringidiots; breedofpieces; dogattack; glendale; itwasontv; pasadena; peoplearestupid; poorinnocentchild; rottweiller; shootem; whereisambroseat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 481-498 next last
To: 4rotts
Did you know a Rott found the last live survivor in the World Trade Towers, 9/11,? This was not a murdering dog!

Yeah, and Hitler got the trains running on time. Doesn't justify either existence.

The only difference between a dangerous dog owner and Charles Manson is a matter of timing and chance.

301 posted on 08/03/2005 12:25:05 PM PDT by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd
Funny you should mention K9 cops. I was a military cop for 8 years. Worked with K9 troops on a daily basis. Some of the dogs were great. One, I can't remember the breed, turned on it's handler and bit him in the face. The skin from the upper left side of his forehead down to the left side of his cheek, just above the chin was ripped off and left dangling. These two were "partners" for over two years. The guys that were near by when it happened could not explain it. The handler could not explain it. Now yes, it was a military working dog, but it was also bonded to it's handler tighter than most people are with their pets. He is the LAST person it should have attacked.

Please understand, I am an animal lover. Truly. I love dogs, cats, just about any animal. More than people sometimes :) but I still believe some breeds of dog are more prone to snap and attack. Not for no reason, but perhaps because of an instinctual reason that may be "hardwired" into their very being.

I mentioned bullsharks in my other post. Vicious, nasty creatures, but I would not eradicate them. And it is possible to swim with them without anything happening. But, by it's nature, it can turn on you and attack (more likely with a bullshark because of it's high level of aggressive hormones). And when bullsharks attack, it's not uncommon that they don't just bite and leave like most sharks, they go for the kill. I tend to think some dog breeds are the same. I don't think they should be eradicated, but I do not turn a blind eye to the fact that some breeds are more apt to be vicious by nature.

302 posted on 08/03/2005 12:25:07 PM PDT by Romish_Papist (Papist. Veteran. American. Conservative. Tattooed. Pierced. Questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

I assume that your comment was meant to be sarcastic but you are more right than you know. Rotties were bred to (among other things) bait bulls and drive cattle to market. Breeds were developed for specific reasons(jobs). Any breed of dog that is 'working' at the job it is bred for or something close to it is much happier and has a more stable temperment than a bored neglected dog (yes I think many spoiled pampered pets are neglected if the owners do not provide them with meaningful(to the dog) 'work')


303 posted on 08/03/2005 12:25:43 PM PDT by sfimom ('Mommy why did they kill her cause she couldn't talk?' (my daughter age8))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

"Funny that my friend has had 3 and never had one incident with any of them."

Obviously your friend didn't train them to be savage killers. The people that take these dogs and turn them into weapons make me sick.


304 posted on 08/03/2005 12:25:50 PM PDT by exile (Exile - Helen Thomas tried to lure me into her Gingerbread House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
According to the CDC Between 1979 and 1996 no Lab or Golden Retriever killed anyone. Not a one. However, "Pit Bulls" killed 60 people, and Rottweillers killed 29.
305 posted on 08/03/2005 12:27:05 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: NietzschesJoker
[ Some rottweilers attack people; therefore, all rottweilers should be exterminated. Where is the logic in this? ]

Exterminated is one thing, outlawed for zoned residential districts is another(like other things are).. same with pit bulls.. But that would bring government into it..

Jailing the owner instead of offing the dog in these events would have more effect.. but that would be gov't intervention too.. HMMM maybe someone needs to invent a poisoned doggy treat launcher.. that way you could launch de-doggy missles at the dogs back yard.. also would work for noisy pooches.. but damn that would make Beagles a hard breed to keep...

Nevermind

306 posted on 08/03/2005 12:27:12 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed by me to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
The rottie is not the "Alpha male" of the pack, the owners are the "Alphas." He is just the top dog in the household, UNDER the owners.

Travis, you're babbling. He might have been the alpha. Heck - he probably was. There are tons of people not in charge of their households when it comes to dogs.

Dogs don't consider people to be the leader - they respect the leader because the leader commands respect. No way any dog would assume that a baby was a new top dog.

The hierarchy of the pack is not a new discovery. Gillman has it right.

307 posted on 08/03/2005 12:27:17 PM PDT by technochick99 (firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Oh, okay.

I just more folks would understand that it's not the breed; it's the owner!!

Semper Fi,
Kelly


308 posted on 08/03/2005 12:28:12 PM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
Considering how many gentle dogs are available to own as pets, I have to wonder why some people prefer to own dogs that are known to "freak easily."

They use them as guard dogs for their house and family and WANT them to be vicious.

309 posted on 08/03/2005 12:28:14 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

People often make a big mistake trusting dogs that "look friendly" or are a supposedly "gentle breed".
An animal is an animal and one cannot always be sure of their behavior unless they are well trained.
My collie wass the sweetest dog ever, but she, like any dog, was capable of snapping or biting.
Often when folks say "I didn't do anything, I don't why the dog did that", that only means they didn't see or hear what the dog saw/heard.


310 posted on 08/03/2005 12:28:42 PM PDT by visualops (www.visualops.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Lekker 1

ROFL you would if you could reach too ;-)


(disclaimer: this is a joke on an otherwise contentious thread)


311 posted on 08/03/2005 12:30:56 PM PDT by sfimom ('Mommy why did they kill her cause she couldn't talk?' (my daughter age8))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

That's true, but it's also poor training. I know I wouldn't want a guard dog to be a mindless killing machine. Personally, I think that's why German Shepards make the best guard dogs. They're a very bright breed and can learn the difference between Aunt Tillie and a rapist. Still, it comes down to training.


312 posted on 08/03/2005 12:32:25 PM PDT by exile (Exile - Helen Thomas tried to lure me into her Gingerbread House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd

R:TW is great. I use the War Dogs either at the onset of an attack or to chase down the fleeing enemy. Incindiary pigs on the other hand... ugh... lame.


313 posted on 08/03/2005 12:33:58 PM PDT by Romish_Papist (Papist. Veteran. American. Conservative. Tattooed. Pierced. Questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Travis, you and I could argue all day, especially when the subject continues to shift away from it's point of origin. However, I do not have all day to argue, nor do I have the desire. Time to move on, wouldn't you agree?


314 posted on 08/03/2005 12:33:59 PM PDT by Capagrl (Liberal - a person so open-minded their brain has fallen out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65

" There are two kinds of Rottweiler/Pit Bull owners - child murderes and future child murderers."


Meet me at DM airbase in Tucson and I will do my best to introduce you to K9 personnel with Rottweilers so you can call them "Future Baby Killers" in person.


315 posted on 08/03/2005 12:34:00 PM PDT by Kokojmudd (Outsource Federal Judiciary and US Senate to India, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: altura
I knew a mean white Lab. Thankfully, not the one I have.
I also know a Rottweiller and a pit bull who are very nice dogs. The Rottie and the pit are my neighbors' dogs and love to play with my Lab.
We also have some neighborhood brats who think it's fun to tell my kids that the pit (we all have chain link fences, so can see into each other's yards) has been in our yard trying to kill our Lab. My kids know it's silly, since the pit and my lab are best friends who like to play. The pit has even shared his food.
316 posted on 08/03/2005 12:37:28 PM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
You're saying that dogs never get jealous of a new child or baby, which suddenly gets all of the love and attention formerly given to it?

Added to the owners being gone, and a "new owner" in the house, and you have a recipe for disaster.

317 posted on 08/03/2005 12:37:33 PM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Romish_Papist
Don't be so sure, from what I've learned, it takes multiple gunshots just to fend off enraged rottweilers, let alone kill them. My fists, or yours, would likely do nothing whatsoever.

I could be wrong. However, it can take multiple gunshot wounds to kill people as well. With smashing the windpipe, I wasn't think of a fist per se, but of a grab and twist. It's a little hard to explain.... this comes from my stepdad who has raised many GSDs, and who has never had a problem being recognized as the alpha by nearly any dog he's met. As he explains, with his own dogs - every day he shows them who's alpha. I don't think fists are effective on dogs that are hell-bent on a fight. However, knowledge of weak spots is key.

318 posted on 08/03/2005 12:39:19 PM PDT by technochick99 (firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Yes, it's not the breed, it's the owner.

But that will not be the point the DA is making in court, if you own a breed with a bad reputation (fairly deserved or not) and it mauls someone.

Then, the jury will be hearing all about "killer breeds," and your irresponsibility in owning a "killer dog."

I may not like it, but that's reality.

319 posted on 08/03/2005 12:39:57 PM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd
Meet me at DM airbase in Tucson and I will do my best to introduce you to K9 personnel with Rottweilers so you can call them "Future Baby Killers" in person.

I don't have a problem with professionals who need these dogs for security reasons.

320 posted on 08/03/2005 12:44:04 PM PDT by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 481-498 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson