Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Did he or did he not kill a woman at Chappaquiddic" Ann Coulter
Fox News ^ | 27 JUL 05 | Self

Posted on 07/27/2005 6:38:35 PM PDT by bannie

Edited on 07/28/2005 5:33:32 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

On Hannity and Colmes, While discussing the requirements of a Supreme Court nominee, Ann just sarcastically noted that it was ok to kill a girl at Chappiquiddic. Colmes said that was a low blow and that comment was below her.

WHY??? WHAT is so darned SACRED about mentioning the truth???

Ann said, "Why..."

Colmes didn't answer, and the set was quiet.

Hannity and Reagan (another guest) should have spoken up.

This is another example of "The Emperor is NAKED!"


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: coulter; foxnews; hannity; hannitycolmes; kennedy; kennedysjorge; tedkennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 921 next last
To: Marysecretary
I haven't seen this in print in any speculations but a likely guess is that Ted's pants were off when they sped away from the guy approaching their car. Hence, he was half naked at the time of the plunge off the bridge into the water. Panicked and half naked, after a brief search to try to get her out of the car, he ran back to the cottage to get a pair of pants. By the time he returned with the handlers and cronies (and none of those drunk liberal dorks could figure out how to get her out of the car), it was too late. Leaving open the likelihood, she died because they were afraid to report an accident incriminating Ted in drunk driving and cheesy adultery.

The absurd changes in his story reflect his reluctance to admit he was half naked at the time of the accident which ocurred after they interrupted engaged in hanky panky.

861 posted on 07/29/2005 10:50:48 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 860 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
may have to TIVO the repeat.

Schedule, please?

862 posted on 07/29/2005 10:53:02 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Lonesome's First Law: Whenever anyone says it's not about the money, it's about the money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
To repeatedly attack and accuse him years on end over a tragic accident is cheap and low IMHO.

He's never really owned up to his culpability nor paid any real legal consequences. Is it too late to open a Federal Civil Rights investigation? Is a woman's access to oxygen a civil right?

863 posted on 07/29/2005 10:57:26 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Lonesome's First Law: Whenever anyone says it's not about the money, it's about the money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
Some people don't marry for looks.

I work in Greenwich Village (ick! got a HandiWipe?) and often bump into Alan Colmes on the street.

The camera isn't kind to him. In real life, he's actually not the freaky-looking hand puppet that he appears to be on TV. I've been on TV and can attest to the fact that, whatever is in your heart and however you look (you hope), TV can turn you into a grinning freakazoid.

Regarding your earlier post about NY state, yes, there are those of us even in Westchester County who vote red. People have to stop looking at state colors as though they are permanent colors. Hillary could have been beaten by someone less inept than Lazio. Our problem, as a state, is that Republican voters in New York do not have the party they deserve.

When Pataki was at his peak he should have made the taking down of Sheldon Silver and his ilk priority one.

864 posted on 07/29/2005 10:57:43 AM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Isn't there a woman's right to choose oxygen?


865 posted on 07/29/2005 11:00:10 AM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 863 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

I was in Greenwich Village only once, back in 1958 when I got married for the first time. My brother in law took us down there. Said not to wear plaid shirts because they'd know you were a tourist! I don't think it was as bad as it is now. It was rather interesting. A new comedian, Phyllis Diller, was featured in a basement club of some kind. You could hear her for $5.00!

I like Alan better than most liberals on TV. He seems kinder than most but he sure can be maddening at times. I suppose he gets paid to do that.

I'm disappointed in our state congresscritters, governor, and all. I hope this changes after Pataki leaves. I was never overly impressed with him.


866 posted on 07/29/2005 11:03:20 AM PDT by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 864 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

Washington Square Park was cleaner in 1958 and I have a video to prove it!

Hard to tell what's post-Pataki. Is there a Republican legacy to run on? Will Jeanne Pirro's mobbed-up husband be an albatross to her candidacy? On the other side, can Carl McCall energize the Dem base? Much remains to be seen though I think the governorship could swing blue again.


867 posted on 07/29/2005 11:12:21 AM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 866 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity

Nothing, of course, would surprise me with the Kennedy Klan. They all seemed to have liked keeping their britches down around their knees. Your speculation might not be so far off (at least not as far off as Teddie's britches!).


868 posted on 07/29/2005 11:27:18 AM PDT by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
I'm sick to death of hearing about Chappaquiddic. I think Kennedy is a despicable person simply because of his politics. That is more than enough. To repeatedly attack and accuse him years on end over a tragic accident is cheap and low IMHO.

Murder doesn't have any statute of limitations. I know he was drunk, blah,blah,blah...

Do you think it'd be old news if he was a republican? He can't say it was a youthful indiscretion. If he had any shame he would've at least went back home to Massachusetts & hope everyone would forget who he was.

I'm sure the poor girl's family don't view the matter as just a tragic accident. Just think how long they've had to live with it.

Your comment may have just been the most flippant, callous and ignorant statement I've ever read on FR.

869 posted on 07/29/2005 11:55:41 AM PDT by Smittie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bannie; Jorge; All

See here for why opposing Kennedy, with everything we have, in word and deed, isn't just ancient history:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1453348/posts


870 posted on 07/29/2005 12:12:07 PM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
"probably thinking"

Once again you conjecture as to what he may have been thinking. Judging from his own statements, he did not appear to be thinking about her at all, only his own future political life.

871 posted on 07/29/2005 12:22:33 PM PDT by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 798 | View Replies]

To: bannie

I heard it. She was right. Sean just sat there like a bump on a log and without comment, leaving Alan to condemn her. (Doesn't he remind you of Church Lady on SNL? tsk tsk tsk)


872 posted on 07/29/2005 12:25:23 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

NY was democrat most of my life here so I'm not sure if there ARE any republicans who could run and win.


873 posted on 07/29/2005 1:12:17 PM PDT by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 867 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
It seems clear that the the role of devils advocate, if that is your purpose, has outlived its utility. If, on the other hand, you are sincere, there appears to be no desire on your part to substantively respond to intellectually harmless queries regarding your position,

Sufficient information has been proferred in the attempt to convince you of the merit present in the oral prosecution of the Chappaquiddick event.

I would suggest that you examine the difference between precept and principle, as that appears to be the area of reconciliation.

Socratic dialogue, if you are familiar with it, would afford you the opportunity to experience the difference. It does require an authentic intellectual integrity and familiarization with the concept of actuality (vis a vis reality).

Unfortunately, this - the forum - is not a particularly suitable venue for such a pursuit.

I wish you well, however.

874 posted on 07/29/2005 1:18:16 PM PDT by pilipo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bannie
Look old Teddy skipped the scene of an accident where a young lady died....

Maybe one of the Bay State readers can clarify the appropriate category of criminal charge.

875 posted on 07/29/2005 2:04:35 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

Obviously she didn't marry for looks.


876 posted on 07/29/2005 2:22:57 PM PDT by Riptides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
[ But that doesn't excuse the hateful meanspirited practice of some on the right of constantly parroting "Chappaquiddic".. I think it shows their weakness in mounting any REAL political offensive against Kennedy. They discredit themselves. I love Rush, but don't like it when he brings this up either. ]

You mean the pubbies need to get mean with democrats.. NICELY.?.

"Nothing too extreme can be said about liberals because it's all true." -Ann Coulter

877 posted on 07/29/2005 2:43:28 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed by me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
Once again you conjecture as to what he may have been thinking. Judging from his own statements, he did not appear to be thinking about her at all, only his own future political life.

I can't disagree with you on this.
It's probably a combination of factors. Neither of us will ever know for sure.

878 posted on 07/29/2005 4:50:37 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 871 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
See here for why opposing Kennedy, with everything we have, in word and deed, isn't just ancient history

You don't have to convince me.
I find Kennedy's attacks on Bush and the Iraq war to be almost treasonous in nature.

He infuriates me to the point I catch myself shouting at the TV when he is being interviewed by the MSM.

I simply don't NEED Chappaquiddic to oppose this man.
It isn't Chappaquiddic but his diseased ideology that poisons the political landscape.

And I think it is a mistake by many on the right to keep ranting about it. It's a distraction from the real issues.

879 posted on 07/29/2005 4:58:49 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 870 | View Replies]

To: Smittie
Your comment may have just been the most flippant, callous and ignorant statement I've ever read on FR.

And this has to be one of the most hysterical drama queen exagerations I've ever read on FR.

I challenge you to cite a statement from me that EVEN comes close to fitting your description above.

I bet you can't do it.

880 posted on 07/29/2005 5:05:38 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 869 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 921 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson