Posted on 07/25/2005 3:22:39 PM PDT by Alex Marko
It is probably not a good idea in terms of job security to publicly call your boss a horse's ass. So have some sympathy for Will Adams, spokesman for Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo. He was asked by reporters to explain the asinine thing the congressman said last week. Adams told them Tancredo is just a "free thinker." By which standard Michael Jackson is just a tad eccentric. Or haven't you heard? Tancredo thinks maybe the United States should bomb Mecca. You know Mecca. City in Saudi Arabia. Birthplace of the prophet Muhammad. Holiest shrine of Islam, a religion practiced by one of every six people on Earth. That's the place a U.S. congressman thinks maybe we should lob some ordnance at.
Tancredo made this contribution to the national dialogue last week during a talk show on WFLA, a TV station in Orlando, Fla. Host Pat Campbell had asked how we should respond if U.S. cities are ever struck by terrorists using nuclear devices. "Well," said Tancredo, "what if you said something like, if this happens in the United States, and we determine that it is the result of extremist, fundamentalist Muslims, you know, you could take out their holy sites."
"You're talking about bombing Mecca," said Campbell.
"Yeah," said Tancredo.
Predictably, Tancredo's suggestion has been a little controversial. That is, if you can call statements of condemnation stretching from Moscow to the State Department to Ankara, Turkey, "a little controversial."
Tancredo has refused to apologize, but he did issue a written "clarification," which said in part, "I do not advocate this. Much more thought would need to be given to the potential ramifications of such a horrific response."
Actually, you don't need to give any thought to the ramifications of such an action, because they should be self-evident to anyone smarter than the average hamster. We would become an international pariah. Muslims would hate us with renewed fervor, and Osama bin Laden would thank us for writing his recruitment material.
In other words, the same situation we have now, except worse. Much, much, much worse.
And I wonder: Am I the only who feels that lately - lately being defined as since Sept. 11, 2001 - the nation seems overrun by yahoos?
Granted, the presence of yahoos in daily life is not a new torment. They have always been among us, the simplemindedness of their thinking exceeded only by the volume at which they express it. Think Cliff Clavin, the cogs of his brain lubricated by beer, holding forth from his stool at the end of the bar. Of course, the only thing you had to do to avoid Cliff was to stay out of Cheers.
But the 9/11 attacks have unleashed yahooism on an unprecedented scale. Cliff is no longer confined to his bar stool. Under the name Mona Charen, he once wrote a newspaper column advocating the expulsion of Muslims from America. Under the name Rush Limbaugh, he has a radio talk show on which he compared the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib to a fraternity prank. Under the name Ann Coulter, he calls for the racial profiling of travelers from the Middle East. And under the name Tom Tancredo, he is apparently a member of Congress.
What he doesn't get - what yahoos usually don't get - is that things that seem to make sense while you're hoisting a few rarely hold up in the sober light of day.
Tancredo has cast his refusal to apologize as a blow against political correctness. Which is silly. One can be plain-spoken without being reckless, blunt without being stupid, straight-forward without sounding like a fool.
Assuming, that is, you have something worthwhile to say. Tancredo evidently does not. Somebody tell him his beer is getting warm.
"He will just hurt the GOP in 08."
Not without the help of the GOP he won't.
So, "A penny for your thoughts" is too high a price, since he's a "free" thinker.
Which is exactly what most of his supporters want to happen.
Wow, libs don't like Tancredo. Big surprise.
These kinds of opinion pieces are a dime a dozen among the leftists.
That, like the illegal stuff, is just a matter of opinion.
The Dems think it's awful but then they didn't blink when the islamic types desecrated sites revered by Christians or Jews in Palestsine. They, like some Republicans, only like to bow to the islamic groups to acknowledge their superiority, I guess.
No, George Bush is hurting the GOP with his pro illegal immigration stance. It used to be just us Californians and Arizona getting inundated, but now many states are dealing with the ravages of open borders. I would rather put up with a Tancredo, than hear Bush calling the Minutemen vigilantes.
and just what would the genius that wrote the article suggest we do if we are hit by a nuclear device wielded by terrorists, surrender?.....
----
I excelled at the running wheel, I'll have you know. Cliff failed miserably, on the other hand.
Insults are a dime a dozen, btw
How much does CAIR pay folks to write this tripe, anyway?
I would suggest that the President give Tancredo the "Sister Souljah" treatment, except that the last thing needed is to give that wingnut any more publicity. Also, Tancredo isn't as influential as the Sister was (notwithstanding the fact that he does have 1 vote out of 435).
Imagine that. Yes, imagine that! It's a superb idea.
Apparently the Leonard Pitts yahoo meter only registers when pointed to the Right.
If you keep on believing the "moderate" RINO-wing of the GOP....
It is THEY who are making a mockery of the tenets of conservatism and American sovereignty, thus destroying the Party from within.
This quote seems to gets more outrageous with each passing day. Context? We don't need no stinkin' context!
On second thought, make that just Tancredo - this author is just an idiot.
ping
Nope, a breathe of FResh air he is.
He will just hurt the GOP in 08.
Nope again, the GOP will be the downfall of the GOP, and it will probably be in '06, not '08. Too bad the Librino's in the GOP can't see it coming. Blackbird.
"If you keep on believing the "moderate" RINO-wing of the GOP....
It is THEY who are making a mockery of the tenets of conservatism and American sovereignty, thus destroying the Party from within."
BTTdamT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.