Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thunderclouds in China ... A Storm is Brewing ...
self | 15 June, 2005 | joanie-f

Posted on 07/15/2005 10:29:12 AM PDT by joanie-f

Below are some excerpts of observations I have posted on other recent threads that I will continue to post when appropriate, because I believe that China’s military build-up may soon prove to be the most ominous threat we face ... Islamic terrorism notwithstanding. (Thank you for your continuing and untiring efforts -- represented by the preceding link -- to document the unparalleled China threat, Jeff Head.)

An article by Bill Gertz in the Washington Times (6/26/05) stated flatly that ‘there's a growing consensus that at some point in the mid-to-late '90s, there was a fundamental shift in the sophistication, breadth and re-sorting of Chinese defense planning …

Let’s review what we (at least we here on this forum) already know, but may occasionally need to be reminded of:

A U.S. State Department document released in early 2002 proved that during the years 1993 to 2000 the most successful Chinese espionage operation in history occurred. The document revealed that Hughes Space and Communications Company violated U.S. national security no fewer than 120 times by deliberately sending sensitive missile and satellite technology directly to the Chinese army. And at no time did Hughes seek or receive a license or other written government approval from the appropriate legal sources to provide sensitive military technology to our militaristic ideological enemy.

Chinese General Shen Rongjun (a leader in the Chinese Army’s Commission on Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense) led the infiltration of U.S. missile and satellite technology during the Clinton administration. General Shen was directly involved in the transfer of technology from Hughes to Chinese operatives, and the Clinton Administration not only turned the other way, but most probably played a large part in engineering the transfer.

Because of then Secretary of State Warren Christopher’s concern that Hughes might be selling sensitive missile and satellite technology to China, and because a State Department license was necessary in order to affect such a transfer, Clinton, ignoring vehement opposition from the Defense Department, the CIA, and the National Security Agency, transferred the power to issue those licenses to the Commerce Department, headed by (the now ‘unfortunately’ deceased) Ron Brown.

The bulk of the huge transfer of sensitive technology occurred immediately after General Shen met one-on-one with Brown in Beijing. (An aside: when Brown was head of the DNC, his committee was fined for ‘knowingly and willingly’ accepting donations from Chinese sources.)

Another all-too-familiar aside: Brown’s funeral was the tragedy that inspired the President’s instantaneous laughter/tears performance that will go down in history as the captured-on-film hypocrisy of the century.

General Shen promised satellite contracts to Hughes if technology transfers continued, and Hughes CEO Michael Armstrong did some arm-twisting in order to be able to accede to Shen’s demands. He threatened to withdraw his significant financial support in the upcoming presidential campaign if Clinton did not see to it that a waiver was issued for the transfers. The waiver was indeed issued and enormous amounts of detailed satellite encryption were summarily handed over to China.

Similar circumventing of legal channels for the transfer of missile guidance and satellite technology occurred in technology transfers from Loral Corporation to the Chinese.

Interesting factoid: Bernard Schwartz, the chairman of Loral, was the largest individual contributor to the democrat party in 1997.

Clinton's transfer allowed the Chinese army to acquire advanced U.S. satellite and missile technology for military purposes. Hughes satellites provided the Chinese army with secure communications that are virtually invincible in ground combat and provide extraordinarily accurate navigation for strike bombers and missiles. Hughes also provided the PLA with advanced technology that is essential for the design and manufacture of missile control systems and missile nose cones. The transfers from Hughes allowed China to develop a new generation of ICBMs and SLBMs that, without the help of the Clinton administration, would have taken China a decade or more to develop on its own.

In 1994, under similar circumstances, sensitive machine tools from an Ohio McDonnell Douglas high-tech factory – machine tools that had been used to make ICBMs and to build B-1, C-17, and F-15 aircraft -- wound up in a Chinese factory that is known to produce Silkworm missiles. Just as occurred with the Hughes technology, the export of these sensitive machine tools required a government-issued export license. And, just as occurred with the Hughes technology, the licensing process was circumvented due to pressures from within the Clinton administration.

The Clinton administration also relaxed controls on the export of U.S. supercomputers. No efforts have been made to verify whether any of the forty-plus supercomputers that have been exported to China are being used in nuclear weapons work.

President Clinton also turned a blind eye to China’s actual theft of sensitive W-88 miniaturization nuclear warhead technology. And possession of this once uniquely American technology now allows China to affix up to ten nuclear warheads on a single missile, with each of the ten aimed at a different target. The W-88 warhead is light compared to other nuclear warheads, but its power is more than ten times that of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.

Interesting factoid: five Chinese satellite launches (a few of which Loral was partnered in) failed between Sept of 1991 and August of 1996. As of August of 1998, many more have been launched ... and none have failed.

Clinton hosted more than a hundred fundraising dinners in the White House in which he solicited, and received, huge financial contributions from our ideological enemies – with China sitting highest on that infamous list of foreign political supporters. Of course the acceptance of such campaign contributions is a federal crime. But the financial illegality of the Clinton strategy pales in comparison to the resulting threat to our national sovereignty – and to our very existence.

So, as a result of Clinton’s overriding of normal State/Intelligence/Pentagon procedures, a series of illicit export control waivers were issued that allowed his top campaign donors to sell sensitive missile and satellite technology to China – technology that would result in this country being placed in the most precarious position in its history.

As if that weren’t treason enough, Mr. Clinton was simultaneously road-blocking the deployment of an American missile defense system, leaving us vulnerable to the very ICBMs that he was helping our enemies produce. American military manpower, materiel, and equipment (especially ships and aircraft) were also cut by roughly one-half during the eight years of the Clinton administration.

Also, on countless occasions, Mr. Clinton refused to impose sanctions on Beijing when intelligence discovered that it was sharing sensitive military technologies, most likely pilfered from America, with the terrorist states of North Korea, Iran and Pakistan.

Clinton was very successful in hiding both the results of his illegal waivers and the growing long-range missile threat to our safety and security … until 1998, when our illustrious president assured us that North Korea didn’t have ballistic missile capabilities … and only days later North Korea launched a missile over Japan that came down off the coast of Alaska.

A direct 1998 quote from the venerable Senator James Inhofe (R-OK): ‘ … It is apparent that the ongoing cover-up of China’s theft of nuclear secrets is one of the greatest national security scandals in American history. Secret files on virtually every technology used in the design of our nuclear arsenal have been compromised … [and] it is factual to say that President Clinton knew he was giving our missile technology to North Korea as well as to China.

Also included in the technology transfer to China during the Clinton administration:

(1) five decades of information garnered from nuclear testing

(2) detailed data related to the design, use and power of nuclear warheads such as the W-56, W-62, W-76, W-87 -- for MX land-based missiles -- and W-88 -- for Trident submarine-based missiles

(3) sensitive details about the neutron bomb

(4) sensitive details about EMP (electromagnetic pulse) weapons

(5) manufacturing specifications for re-entry vehicles

(6) space radar capabilities

(7) computer programs that simulate nuclear tests

Today we are aware that China has at least twenty ICBMs aimed at American cities, and many Pentagon and Intelligence Department officials firmly believe that they are ready to launch them, should we attempt to come to the defense of Taiwan when China seeks to re-absorb that island sometime in the next two years.

Another recent Bill Gertz article in the Washington Times (6/22/05) reported the recent success of a submarine-launched ballistic missile test, and stated that US intelligence determined the missile to be a JL-2.

The Gertz article claims that Intelligence isn’t certain whether the launch took place from a Type 094 nuclear sub, or from an older sub that was modified to accommodate missile launch testing.

The design and construction of both the technologically sophisticated JL-2 missile and the Type 094 sub almost certainly benefited from the Clinton administration’s treasonous activities listed above. Chinese secrecy about its missile and sub programs has been of highest priority, and extraordinarily effective, for the past five or six years especially.

According to various reliable sources (The Claremont Institute, the Federation of American Scientists, and globalsecurity.com among them), there is a strong likelihood that both the new missile and the new sub are now fully operational. So it appears that China may well now possess a missile with a sufficient range (~5,000 miles), capable of carrying a single 1 MT warhead, or half a dozen MIRVs each with a 150KT yield, and an extraordinarily sophisticated anti-missile defense system … as well as a new sophisticated class of nuclear-powered sub from which to launch it.

The thought that China could launch a missile from a sub sitting in its own territorial waters, capable of targeting any location in the US is frightening enough. But such capability would also certainly allow the PLA to detonate such a warhead(s) 250-300 miles above the US and set in motion a mighty powerful EMP (electromagnetic pulse), sufficient to render this country incapable of defending itself from successive attacks targeted at our cities and strategic military targets. President Reagan, especially, shared that concern, and, as a result, a substantial part of his Strategic Defense Initiative was focused on the possibility of an atmospheric EMP attack.

Although an EMP attack wouldn’t necessarily cause immediate massive death and destruction, it would weaken us dramatically and render us vulnerable to successive (possibly immediate) attacks on our population itself. An EMP explosion would make ‘dead’ (and irreparable for months, if not years) just about everything dependent upon electricity. Our entire infrastructure would be rendered useless. Imagine our nation continuing to survive without access to reliable transportation, with our financial systems unplugged, all manner of telecommunications severed, energy and energy distribution systems crippled … As for our ability to retaliate, our weapons/missile systems and the ability to communicate between military departments and troop deployments would also be severely limited, if not non-existent.

Regarding the belief, by some, that our military is appropriately hardened against such an EMP attack, former CIA chief James Woolsey last year commended the congressional Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from EMP Attack for its years of research performed to evaluate our ability to survive such an attack and for its ominous conclusion that EMP is a viable method of attack that could lead to the defeat of the U.S. by either a rogue state or a burgeoning military superpower.

Excerpt from the commission’s report:

The end of the Cold War relaxed the discipline for achieving EMP survivability within the Department of Defense, and gave rise to the perception that an erosion of EMP survivability of military forces was an acceptable risk.

EMP simulation and test facilities have been mothballed or dismantled, and research concerning EMP phenomena, hardening design, testing, and maintenance has been substantially decreased. However, the emerging threat environment, characterized by a wide spectrum of actors that include near-peers, established nuclear powers, rogue nations, sub-national groups, and terrorist organizations that either now have access to nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles or may have such access over the next 15 years have combined to place the risk of EMP attack and adverse consequences on the US to a level that is not acceptable.

Current policy is to continue to provide EMP protection to strategic forces and their controls; however, the end of the Cold War has relaxed the discipline for achieving and maintaining that capability within these forces. The Department of Defense must continue to pursue the strategy for strategic systems to ensure that weapons delivery systems of the New Triad are EMP survivable, and that there is, at a minimum, a survivable ‘thin-line’ of command and control capability to detect threats and direct the delivery systems.

IMO, the lack of focus on the EMP scenario is one of our leadership’s most deadly oversights. And it is just another example of a post-Reagan refocus that has lost its sense of priority. In addition to being the primary catalyst in the bankrupting of the then-Soviet Union, Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative was also extraordinarily forward-looking in that it acknowledged the horrific threat that an atmospheric EMP attack represented, and it took the first steps toward preparing for the prevention of, and maintaining the ability to respond to, such an attack. Yet, since Reagan left office, our leaders, each in turn, have turned their focus away from what may eventually prove to be the most menacing, and most easily perpetrated, threat we face.

The following observations are merely a microscopically small sampling of countless warnings from intelligent, informed patriots who are attempting to issue a much-needed wake-up call, to the western world in particular.

In addition to the excerpted comments below, perhaps the most comprehensive collection of facts regarding the potential threat that an EMP attack would entail is contained in the following guide:

Twenty-First Century Complete Guide to EMP Attack Threats

__________________________________________________

Pertinent comments of Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ), highly respected member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and the man most believed would have been appointed chairman of that all-important committee, had Arlen Specter not retained his seat, in Unready For This Attack:

An electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack on the American homeland … is one of only a few ways that the United States could be defeated by its enemies -- terrorist or otherwise. And it is probably the easiest. A single Scud missile, carrying a single nuclear weapon, detonated at the appropriate altitude, would interact with the Earth's atmosphere, producing an electromagnetic pulse radiating down to the surface at the speed of light. Depending on the location and size of the blast, the effect would be to knock out already stressed power grids and other electrical systems across much or even all of the continental United States, for months if not years.

__________________________________________________

Pertinent comments of Paul M. Weyrich, Chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation, in Electromagnetic Pulse: An Avoidable Disaster:

The very day the 9/11 Commission report was issued another report, that may one day prove itself to be even more important to our security, also was released. ‘The Report of the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack’ stated that our country has the ability to prevent the worst-case scenarios from occurring in this age of international terrorism.

If a nuclear blast occurred in high altitudes over our country, people would not be killed by the fallout from the blast itself. The most serious and far-reaching damage would be done by the EMP emissions. The result? According to the report, ‘the 'electromagnetic shock' that disrupts or damages electronics-based control systems, sensors, communication systems, protective systems, computers, and similar devices … Its damage or functional disruption occurs essentially simultaneously over a very large area.’ One scenario outlined by the EMP Commission predicted that a blast over Chicago, where 70% of our country's total power generation occurs, would instantly impact cities as distant as New York and Washington, D.C.

… steps taken now can prepare us to deal with, even thwart, the mayhem caused by terrorists and rogue nations. I hope we have some lawmakers who share [my] concern in preserving our American way of life for future generations. If we do, then I expect Congress will delve further into the work of the EMP Commission and its unsettling findings.

__________________________________________________

Pertinent comments by Jack Spencer, Senior Policy Analyst for Defense and National Security in the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies at The Heritage Foundation in The Electromagnetic Pulse Commission Warns of an Old Threat with a New Face:

Little has been done to safeguard U.S. electrical systems from the EMP threat beyond simply protecting the nation's nuclear war-fighting infrastructure -- and even that is not as secure as it once was. During the Cold War, only the Soviet Union -- and to a lesser extent China -- had the ability to mount an EMP attack against the United States …

An EMP attack damages all unprotected electronic equipment within the blast's ‘line of sight’ (the EMP's ‘footprint’ on the earth's surface). The size of the footprint is determined by the altitude of the explosion. The higher the altitude, the greater the land area affected. A Scud-type ballistic missile launched from a vessel in U.S. coastal waters and detonated at an altitude of 95 miles could degrade electronic systems across one-quarter of the United States. A more powerful missile launched from North Korea could probably deliver a warhead 300 miles above America--enough to degrade the electronic systems across the entire continental United States.

Furthermore, a nuclear weapon with only a low explosive yield could be designed to generate a strong EMP. In fact, crude weapons with low yields, such as those used against Japan in World War II, would have ample power to generate an EMP over the entire continental United States.

… an EMP attack on America is a serious possibility and one for which the United States is unprepared. While the world focuses on WMDs and ballistic missiles, it is imperative that an EMP attack be considered with equal weight. The profound impact that an EMP attack would have on a developed, modern, electronically oriented country forces nations in similar positions to reassess their own protection against such attack.

__________________________________________________

Pertinent comments of Frank J. Gaffney, Jr., President of the Center for Security Policy, in EMP: America’s Achilles Heel:

If Osama bin Laden -- or the dictators of North Korea or Iran -- could destroy America as a twenty-first century society and superpower, would they be tempted to try? Given their track records and stated hostility to the United States, we have to operate on the assumption that they would. That assumption would be especially frightening if this destruction could be accomplished with a single attack involving just one relatively small-yield nuclear weapon—and if the nature of the attack would mean that its perpetrator might not be immediately or easily identified.

Unfortunately, such a scenario is not far-fetched. According to a report issued last summer by a blue-ribbon, Congressionally-mandated commission, a single specialized nuclear weapon delivered to an altitude of a few hundred miles over the United States by a ballistic missile would be ‘capable of causing catastrophe for the nation.’ The source of such a cataclysm might be considered the ultimate “weapon of mass destruction” (WMD)—yet it is hardly ever mentioned in the litany of dangerous WMDs we face today. It is known as electromagnetic pulse (EMP).

… the attributes that make us a military and economic superpower without peer are also our potential Achilles’ heel. In today’s world, wracked by terrorists and their state sponsors, it must be asked: Might not the opportunity to exploit the essence of America’s strength—the managed flow of electrons and all they make possible—in order to undo that strength prove irresistible to our foes? This line of thinking seems especially likely among our Islamofascist enemies, who disdain such man-made sources of power and the sorts of democratic, humane and secular societies which they help make possible. These enemies believe it to be their God-given responsibility to wage jihad against Western societies in general and the United States in particular.

Calculations that might lead some to contemplate an EMP attack on the United States can only be further encouraged by the fact that our ability to retaliate could be severely degraded by such a strike. In all likelihood, so would our ability to assess against whom to retaliate. Even if forward-deployed U.S. forces were unaffected by the devastation wrought on the homeland by such an attack, many of the systems that transmit their orders and the industrial base necessary to sustain their operations would almost certainly be seriously disrupted.

___________________________________________________

From 1998 Congressional Hearings, Committee on National Security, Military Research and Development Subcommittee:

Pertinent comments of Gen. Robert T. Marsh, USAF retired, and Chairman of the President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection:

This commission is charged with assessing threats to our critical infrastructures and their vulnerabilities. The President identified eight infrastructures as our national life support system. They are: telecommunications, electric power systems, oil and gas transportation and storage, banking and finance, transportation, water supply systems, and emergency services such as medical, police, fire and rescue, and continuity of government services.

The first line of the Executive order says it all: Certain national infrastructures are so vital that their incapacity or destruction would have a debilitating impact on the defense or economic security of the United States.

__________________________________________________

Pertinent comments of Dr. George W. Ulrich, Deputy Director of Defense Special Weapons Agency:

A megaton-class thermonuclear explosion about 250 miles over Omaha, Nebraska, would emit an Electromagnetic Pulse large and strong enough to collapse information society from coast to coast, at the speed of light … nearly the entire contiguous 48 States would be affected with potentially damaging EMP experience from Boston to Los Angeles, from Chicago to New Orleans.

Likewise, potential military vulnerability may be growing. The revolution from military affairs has brought with it a much greater dependence on information technologies. The ability to generate raw data, process it into usable form, and communicate information to the right people and systems is critical to military success, yet the sensors, computers and communications assets essential to this revolution could be vulnerable.

… high-altitude EMP does not distinguish between military and civilian systems. Unhardened infrastructure systems, such as commercial power grids, telecommunication networks, as we have discussed before, remain vulnerable to widespread outages and upsets due to high-altitude EMP. While DOD hardens their assets it deems vital, no comparable civilian programs exist. Thus the detonation of one or a few high-altitude nuclear weapons could result in serious problems for the entire U.S. civil and commercial infrastructure.

__________________________________________________

Pertinent comments of Rep. Curt Weldon (R-PA), Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee:

… 95 percent of our military communications go through commercial channels. Are we confident that EMP will not disable or disrupt these commercial communications systems? How confident are we that the military could continue to communicate effectively if commercial systems were disrupted or completely disabled by EMP? How thoroughly do we protect our weapons systems from EMP? Are we confident they will continue to function?

__________________________________________________

Pertinent comments of Dr. Gary L. Smith, Director of Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University:

The area of the Earth's surface directly illuminated by EMP is determined entirely by the height of burst. All points on the Earth's surface within the horizon, as seen from the burst point, will experience EMP effects … It is not terribly burst-strength dependent; almost any burst will produce that kind of radiation. The strength of the field will change at the various radii from the burst point, but it will cover the same area regardless of the strength of the burst.

The amplitude, duration and polarization of the wave depend on the location of the burst, the type of weapon, the yield, and the relative position of the observer. The electric field resulting from a high-altitude nuclear detonation can be on the order of 50 kilovolts per meter with a rise time on the order of 10 nanoseconds and a decay time to half maximum of about 200 nanoseconds. It is very fast.

It is important to point out, however, that the peak amplitude, signal rise rate, and duration of the EMP wave are not uniform over the illuminated area; the largest peak intensities of the EMP signal occur in that region of the illuminated area where the line of sight to the burst is perpendicular to the Earth's magnetic field. At the edge of the illuminated area, that is, farthest towards the horizon as seen from the burst, the peak field intensity will be about half of the maximum levels, and the EMP fields will be somewhat longer lasting than in the areas where the peak intensities are the largest.

Second, the area covered by an EMP signal can be immense. As a consequence, large portions of extended power and communications networks, for example, can simultaneously be put at risk. Such far-reaching effects are peculiar to EMP. Neither natural phenomena nor any other nuclear weapon effects are so widespread.

__________________________________________________

Pertinent comments of Dr. Lowell Wood, noted physicist at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory:

… the basic point is that essentially all of our conventional military capability and all of our civilian infrastructure is highly vulnerable to EMP damage. The dollar numbers in the civilian infrastructure alone can be conservatively estimated at several trillion dollars' worth of infrastructure which is at risk potentially even from a single pulse—several trillion dollars. So the Congress might properly or appropriately be minded to engage the issue on the basis not only that defeat of our conventional military forces but a very, very profound economic damage to our civilian infrastructure is possible.

None of the above men are alarmists. Yet their warnings are indeed alarming, especially considering recent events just off the Chinese coast.

And the bottom line is that now, in 2005, as a result of the treasons of 1993-2000, the power and technological advantage enjoyed by the Chinese is probably, in large part, the result of (bartered for political support) research reports, design specifications, computer models and hi-tech machinery provided by the United States. And, when we are called upon – most likely within the next two years – to defend Taiwan, we will find ourselves confronting an enemy largely armed to the teeth by one of our own Presidents.

Our men will die, our weaponry and equipment will be blown up, and freedom-loving nations will find themselves facing an ominous predator unlike any the world has ever known … in large part because of William Jefferson Clinton’s thirst for power, allegiance to a leftist political agenda … and obsessive desire to manufacture a personal legacy.

~joanie


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 183; armsbuildup; armsrace; china; chinesebuildup; chinesemilitary; emp; freeperjoanief; military; missile; nuclear; redchinathreat; submarine; threat; worldwariii; wwiii; zaq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-267 next last
To: Quix
I just read your profile page. You are clearly a good, Christ-centered person. I also recall that you and I exchange private emails about 2.5 years ago.

While don't agree with your views on prophetic dreaming, you are certainly entitled to those views. I also get frustrated with the scores of people on FR who seem to think that China is poised on the brink of invading the US mainland. I personally find this fear to be irrational, dangerous, and entirely without justification.

In any case, please accept my apologies for the harshness of my tone. It was unwarranted.

181 posted on 07/17/2005 7:17:23 AM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son

1) The prophet/ess concerned is someone who puts their whole trust and whole life in Jesus The Christ and walks intimately by and with His Spirit. As is commonly my experience, I suspect they are one of the more reliable sorts who are of low earthly status but high heavenly status being a watchman on the wall quietly but powerfully.

2) I tend to be close minded toward people's perspectives who are close minded, narrow, rigid, etc. about I Cor 12 and 14.

3) Calling such a servant of The Most High God a forturne teller is not likely to please HIM.


182 posted on 07/17/2005 7:54:47 AM PDT by Quix (GOD'S LOVE IS INCREDIBLE . . . BUT MUST BE RECEIVED TO . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son

Apology accepted.

I have enough battle scars on such issues, I may have a bit of a reflex response. But I also recognize that you seem to Love God and seek to serve Him. That's a super high priority in my book and I'm honored and happy to call you a brother.

I tend to get annoyed with folks who are so convinced about this or that regarding China without having lived there.

In spite of your aversion, I still encourage you to seek out Dimitru Duduman's grandson's site about his dreams and visions and biography. Read his biography. Read 20% of his better known visions about China. THEN PRAY ABOUT THEM. THEN tell me what you think.

There is no explanation for his life other than that God intervened in an Eastern European alcoholic Sailor's life and turned it around, inside out and upside down for Jesus.


183 posted on 07/17/2005 7:58:43 AM PDT by Quix (GOD'S LOVE IS INCREDIBLE . . . BUT MUST BE RECEIVED TO . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Yeah, I remember Mao well and I remember how much damage he did to his own people. But he was freely spending the lives of other people. Mao himself died of old age. He plainly stated that China could afford to get rid of a bunch of population. China now has a serious "middle class " so I expect they would take a dim view, and have the means do do something about, any new purges. I keep watching for evidence the Chicom military is being pumped up do do other than defend Mother China. What do you suppose the Chinese word for "kamikazi "is?


184 posted on 07/18/2005 11:34:31 AM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Quix

I do indeed understand the apparent Chicom hankering to be the Alpha Dog. They are, however and for instance, short on electricity, a condition that will prevent top dogginess as long as it exists. Their recent rapid econ growth has hit the stone wall of power supply and seems to be moderating somewhat, probably because of that. They are currently building a booster power station that will run on natural gas, something they don't have, intended to run only in the summer, to supply the load caused by AIR CONDITIONING and the reefers they built during the Great Leap Forward. Altho I'm not a freak about it I do watch what they are actually building and buying---it's instructional-----


185 posted on 07/18/2005 11:49:18 AM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: cherokee1

Wise soul, you are.

Please email me summaries, if you come up with such, when you think worth it.

Blessings,


186 posted on 07/18/2005 12:50:37 PM PDT by Quix (GOD'S LOVE IS INCREDIBLE . . . BUT MUST BE RECEIVED TO . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

In the spirit of the good old cowboy quick draw .... I must admit that I have a certain fondness for my .44 Mag S&W revolver. I had to splurge and get the nice hand tooled leather holster and all .. there was a place going out of business and I swooped right in there ... LOL! Saving up for a good lever action cowboy rifle ... someday!


187 posted on 07/18/2005 1:58:19 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Quix

I seriously doubt that the Japanese would ally with the Chinese under any circumstances. That has got to be one of the most "oil and waterish" possible alliances. Don't get faked out by a few Japanese businesses dealing with the PRC in the short term. The US is actually more in bed with the PRC economically than the Japanese - the Japanese have a much more diverse set of low cost countries they deal with - many in SE Asia, for example. The Japanese also have ongoing domestic production and good CD. When the balloon goes up, due to their front line position, they will be the first to fire back at the Chi Coms.


188 posted on 07/18/2005 2:03:54 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

I got a 30-30 lever carbine thinking that would be cool, but it runs hot enough to fry an egg after two rounds, and it kicks like a mule. There is probably something wrong with the interior geometry. The 45 WinMag pistol is supremely accurate and has 1/2 the whomp of the 12 gauge with mag slug at the muzzle, very similar to the 44 mag, but for just fun the 45 Colt single action can hardly be beat.


189 posted on 07/18/2005 2:11:57 PM PDT by RightWhale (Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

One of these days I'll probably get me a good 45. The 9 (Browing) is fine, but as you have alluded to, a good 45 is tough to beat. Familiar at all with Kimber's hardware?


190 posted on 07/18/2005 2:21:31 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

Typo: Browing > Browning.


191 posted on 07/18/2005 2:22:10 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

A step up from the 9 is the 40. That is popular with competitive combat shooters as it is a little cheaper to reload than the 45, has somewhat less kick and has sufficient power to knock down the pins.


192 posted on 07/18/2005 2:28:32 PM PDT by RightWhale (Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: JockoManning

Bookmarking to self:

'... encourage you to seek out Dimitru Duduman's grandson's site about his dreams and visions and biography. Read his biography. Read 20% of his better known visions about China. THEN PRAY ABOUT THEM. THEN tell me what you think.

There is no explanation for his life other than that God intervened in an Eastern European alcoholic Sailor's life and turned it around, inside out and upside down for Jesus.'


193 posted on 07/18/2005 2:31:05 PM PDT by JockoManning (www.biblegateway.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Good point on the cost of reloading!


194 posted on 07/18/2005 2:38:22 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

You could be right.

But Duduman's scenario is also possible.


195 posted on 07/18/2005 6:59:54 PM PDT by Quix (GOD'S LOVE IS INCREDIBLE . . . BUT MUST BE RECEIVED TO . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
"Pertinent comments of Dr. Lowell Wood, noted physicist at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory:

… the basic point is that essentially all of our conventional military capability and all of our civilian infrastructure is highly vulnerable to EMP damage. The dollar numbers in the civilian infrastructure alone can be conservatively estimated at several trillion dollars' worth of infrastructure which is at risk potentially even from a single pulse—several trillion dollars. So the Congress might properly or appropriately be minded to engage the issue on the basis not only that defeat of our conventional military forces but a very, very profound economic damage to our civilian infrastructure is possible.

None of the above men are alarmists. Yet their warnings are indeed alarming, especially considering recent events just off the Chinese coast.

And the bottom line is that now, in 2005, as a result of the treasons of 1993-2000, the power and technological advantage enjoyed by the Chinese is probably, in large part, the result of (bartered for political support) research reports, design specifications, computer models and hi-tech machinery provided by the United States. And, when we are called upon – most likely within the next two years – to defend Taiwan, we will find ourselves confronting an enemy largely armed to the teeth by one of our own Presidents.

Our men will die, our weaponry and equipment will be blown up, and freedom-loving nations will find themselves facing an ominous predator unlike any the world has ever known … in large part because of William Jefferson Clinton’s thirst for power, allegiance to a leftist political agenda … and obsessive desire to manufacture a personal legacy."



the implications are tremendous. We as a people are not prepared. Does anyone have their own generator? Is there a way to shield it? Are the products available? Should we all buy an old pre 1975 car? This is so immense that it is difficult to know where to begin with any sort of descent effective preparations.

There was a TV show about the survival of the US after an emp "Dark Angel". Believe it ran for 2 seasons. Bicycles were important means of transportation.
196 posted on 07/19/2005 3:35:41 PM PDT by Countyline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
I agree with the hypothesis that the muslims and the Chinese are working together. One would think that it would be easy to supply the nukes for the Muslims, simply to take away the blame and then join in once the terrorists have already knocked us on our knees.
197 posted on 07/19/2005 4:03:42 PM PDT by MontanaMatt (Take out Iran while you can! http://www.gogindex.org/news.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

Is it my imagination or is it happening that the readers here and the rest of the nation are shrugging their shoulders; and going on with daily routines as usual?

The 'what can I do about it response'?

It may result in it being the end of our nation ... ho hum.

Doesn't anyone get a fire in their belly anymore?


198 posted on 07/20/2005 11:26:21 AM PDT by Countyline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George from New England
Riots will ensue due to nobody knowing anything. No news will be panic news.

Oh my God! It'll be just like Y2K!!!

199 posted on 07/20/2005 1:24:19 PM PDT by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
Late night re-BUMP.
200 posted on 07/20/2005 11:19:53 PM PDT by SiliconValleyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson