This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 07/19/2005 10:31:17 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
New thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1446077/posts |
Posted on 07/13/2005 11:15:06 PM PDT by TexKat
Mountain Brook High School graduate Natalee Holloway went missing May 30 during a senior trip to Aruba. AP photo
Joran was with Natalee the night she disappeard. FACT.
Joran felt the need to LIE about where he left her off. FACT.
Natalee was never seen again. FACT.
Now, if this were YOUR daughter, just tell us how in the name of God, you would for one split second, think that Joran was not involved with her disappearance? Tell us, that in spite of his confirmed LIE, that YOU, as the girl's Mother...could possibley NOT conclude he was involved.. Be honest...no BS.
sw
I don't know if it is a true story or not, but this looks like a link to the individual that the NE is referring to:
James L. Dooley & Associates, Inc.
James Dooley - President jim@theheadhunter.com Biography
Bella Dooley - CFO bella@theheadhunter.com Biography
Thanks for posting it.
I was just expressing my general skepticism about the National Enquirer, especially given the way this particular story is sourced.
Where did I say I "th[ought] that Joran was not involved with her disappearance?" Please show me the post where I supposedly said that.
I think the problem here is not being precise with words. "Involved" is a word that's too imprecise on its own (as in the current MSM claims that the White House denied that Karl Rove was "involved" in discussions about Valerie Plame -- of course Rove was "involved" ...but he wasn't involved in leaking Plame's name or status).
What I have said, some time ago, was that my theory was that Joran and the Kalpoes might not be guilty of murder; and that it was possible that none of the three knew of her ultimate fate.
If you like, I could go on about various theories that could explain the lying without involvement in murder; but other people have expounded on the same theories before, and I don't want to go on too long.
OK, if you have time, I would much appreciate your posting specific facts from the "mountain of evidence."
If you do, I hope you will carefully "sift through" and distinguish between absolutely known facts, and things that have simply been repeated often enough that many people believe them to be facts.
I also hope you'll take a look at the RW post, linked by FReeper 'toldyou' in post 1779, that is very contradictory to some of the information we've been assuming is the story of this case.
Now again, that is an anonymously sourced post. I don't know if it's true; nobody does, except the person who anonymously posted it.
But OTOH, I don't see any reason to think that particular RW post is less true than almost all the other stories we've heard in this case.
Thanks Fritzy, makes sense.
Maybe you could start a new thread to defend yourself.
Now, really. How arrogant is that? You're not the judge in this case. Do you own homework, if you want a real opinion.
Your position is "I won't believe anything unless someone proves it to me." Your lack of knowledge about Aruba and everything else is the result of your own lack of effort. Most people here are sharing ideas and trying to understand this case. But you don't seem to be interested in that. You seemed to be mostly looking for opportunities to brag about your son.
Sorry for being blunt, but my patience has worn thin. This is the last response from me. I would rather chat with people who have open minds and do their homework.
People on this thread care deeply about what happens here. This thread isn't about you...it is about Nat and Beth.
Sorry if this has been mentioned before, but this morning on the five am, CBS Boston newschannel, they said that a six inch piece of duct tape with long hairs attached and what looked like blood...washed up on the eastern tip of Aruba. The LE are sending it to Holland for forensics....DNA. Someone should ask Beth Twitty for a sample if they haven't already.
Okay, just saw that you all know about the duct tape. Good.
But we had not heard about blood, at least I had not. Thanks for the info hershey.
Depressing "facts of evidence" there. But isn't that only what the PRESS knows about Natalee? Isn't there ANYTHING else that points to Natalee against her will? Such as the phone call to her Mom? I hope there is SOMETHING else. Why else would Jug talk about devastating facts? I hope there are facts we don't know. FRANKLY, I don't think they would have held Joran these next 60 days if that was all they had.
Milichi.... I have a short time to live, perhaps............ I feel like my good friend Steve McQueen when he moved to Mexico ............ he was blowing up with cancer.
I am looking for some bizarre cures.......................like a sh*t load of garlic, a bunch of carrots........ or whatever!
******
The truth of ALL THINGS may be that spending at least an hour on FR each day (by every American voter)............... just may be the cure of all things.
Bless FR............... and please eat well.
Yeah, right. A conversation with a clerk at a clothing store in the USA, and the FBI gets the Aruban LE to arrest Paulus. NO! WAY!
I suppose it depends on how you choose to raise a child. You seem perfectly content with the job you did, as does Mrs. VDS.
Girls throwing themselves on your son and caressing him? And you are telling me that, oh well, it's the culture we live in? Perhaps if you permit it, it's your culture. If I ever witnessed such behavior, and my son didn't have enough sense to morals to put a stop to it, I, as his mother, would make CERTAIN that it stopped. And I guarantee I would not be PC about it.
We obviously don't agree about what is acceptable for teenage male behavior. That's fine. And since this thread isn't about us or our sons, I'll leave the subject alone.
Joran lied numerous times about his activities with Natalee. That alone should make him the #1 suspect besides being the last known person to be seen with her.
As soon as it was found out that Joran and the brothers LIED about where they let Natalee off, it would be naive to even suggest they knew nothing about her fate. They had a good reason for not telling the truth, and a person doesn't need to be a "shrink" to figure that out. It's elementary.
If she died in Jorans care, HE KNEW. And if she were passed off to someone else, HE KNEW that as well. Joran is guilty of something, we just don't know what it is...yet.
He knows what happened to Natalee.
sw
I agree.....he knows. And I think daddy VDS does too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.