Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Story Behind the Clinton Body Count (from HILLARY'S SECRET WAR)
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | July 13, 2005 | Richard Poe

Posted on 07/13/2005 9:07:30 AM PDT by Richard Poe

WorldNetDaily.com

WND Exclusive Commentary

HILLARY'S SECRET WAR

The real story behind
the Clinton body count


Posted: July 13, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern


Editor's note: The following is an eye-opening look into New York Times best-selling author Richard Poe's revealing book, "Hillary's Secret War." Whereas Edward Klein's book on the New York senator reveals previously unknown aspects of her personal life, Poe's expose focuses on how Hillary Clinton and the left's "shadow government" have labored to put her and her far-left agenda in the White House by controlling the still-uncensored flow of real news to Americans – via the Internet.

If that sounds too fantastic to be true, read on.

By Richard Poe
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

"When Clinton lied, nobody died," says a popular bumper sticker.

While untrue, the slogan makes good propaganda. Democrats can repeat it ad infinitum without fear of rebuttal from Republicans. No conservative in public life is willing to broach the topic of the Clinton body count in 2005. Yet the Clintons are more vulnerable on this issue than on any other.

Nixon's articles of impeachment did not accuse him of ordering the burglary of Democratic Party headquarters at the Watergate Hotel. They accused him only of covering up the burglary, after the fact.

Likewise, no one can prove that Deputy White House Counsel Vincent Foster met his death through foul play. It is quite possible that he committed suicide. However, it has been proved beyond doubt that the Clinton White House obstructed, corrupted and undermined every effort to investigate Foster's death.

Nixon was held accountable for his obstructive acts. The Clintons were not.

A nation in denial

British journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard is one of the most knowledgeable investigators of the Foster cover-up. The Cambridge-educated Evans-Pritchard is less easily dismissed than many Clinton critics. He covered war-torn Central America for the Economist and the Sunday Telegraph. As the Telegraph's Washington bureau chief from 1992 to 1997, he "was known in Washington for accuracy, industry and courage" in the words of Washington Post pundit Robert Novak.

Evans-Pritchard has commented on the cocoon of denial into which many decent, well-meaning people retreat when their governments go bad. He has seen it in many countries. "You tell the people in San Salvador that their air force is carpet-bombing the campesinos, they say that's impossible," he remarked to New York Times Magazine writer Philip Weiss. Evans-Pritchard saw a similar self-delusion proliferating in Clinton's America.

According to Evans-Pritchard, he became "radicalized" in Nicaragua. "I could see that what the [foreign] press was writing was not true about the Sandinistas," he told Insight magazine in 1997. "They had a love affair with the revolution. They were all sitting around Managua and going to parties with Sandinista officials. There was a very romantic side to it all. But out there in the countryside, the Sandinistas were doing horrible things to the campesinos ... people were being killed in quite large numbers."

Evans-Pritchard did what his colleagues would not. He traveled the countryside and interviewed campesinos. They were only too glad to tell him about Sandinista atrocities. "For the first time in my life, I realized that what you read in the papers is not true, and this quite shocked me. I started writing from a different point of view, and I found myself very quickly in a big dispute with my colleagues, and it never ended."

In Clinton's America, Evans-Pritchard saw journalists behaving little differently from their colleagues in the Managua press corps. "The way [American reporters] cover Arkansas is exactly the way they covered Nicaragua, which is they didn't go out into the hills and talk to ordinary people," he noted in 1997.

Evans-Pritchard undertook the task himself. He presented his discoveries in a 1997 book titled, "The Secret Life of Bill Clinton: The Unreported Stories" – in my view, the most accurate, thorough and fearless account of Clinton corruption yet produced. It offers a detailed expose of the Clintons' ties to drug lords and death squads, in an America rapidly descending into Salvadoran-style lawlessness.

"To a foreign eye, America looks like a country that is flying out of control," writes Evans-Pritchard.

[I]t is under Clinton that an armed militia movement involving tens of thousands of people has mushroomed out of the plain ... People do not spend their weekends with an SKS rifle, drilling for guerrilla warfare ... in a country that is at ease with itself. It takes very bad behavior to provoke the first simmerings of armed insurgency, and the militias are unmistakably Clinton's offspring.

Regarding Vincent Foster's peculiar death and the ensuing cover-up, Evans-Pritchard wrote in 1997, "The Foster case is taboo for American journalists. In private, many concede that the official story is unbelievable, but they will not broach it in print ... It has nothing to do with party affiliation. If anything, Republican journalists are even more susceptible to the spell."

'Cleaning house'

Jerry Luther Parks was reportedly watching a news bulletin on the death of Vincent Foster when he turned from the television and muttered, "I'm a dead man." His son Gary was with him in the room. It was July 21, 1993. The White House Deputy Counsel had just been found dead in Fort Marcy Park, about seven miles from the White House, across the Potomac River in Virginia. Foster had been shot through the head, said the bulletin, an apparent suicide.

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard interviewed the Parks family extensively. In "The Secret Life of Bill Clinton," he reports that Parks was a nervous wreck for the next two months. He packed a gun and drove evasively to shake off any possible pursuers. At one point, Parks told his family that Bill Clinton was "cleaning house" and that he was "next on the list." Parks had been security chief for Clinton-Gore campaign headquarters in Little Rock, Ark., in 1992.

On Sept. 23, 1993, as Parks was driving to his suburban Little Rock home along the Chenal Parkway, a white Chevrolet Caprice with two men inside drove alongside and peppered Parks' car with semiautomatic gunfire. Parks's car ground to a halt. A man emerged from the white Chevy, fired two rounds into Parks' chest with a 9-mm pistol, then sped off.

Several witnesses watched the murder. The killers were never found. As with so many other "Arkancides" – the name given to the long list of suspicious deaths among Arkansas associates of the Clintons – Big Media ignored the event.

One of the last people to see Vincent Foster alive was Linda Tripp, who then worked as a secretary for Foster's boss, White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum. Tripp testified before Kenneth Starr's grand jury on July 28, 1998, that the reason she had leaked Monica Lewinsky's story to Michael Isikoff at Newsweek was that Tripp hoped the spotlight of national publicity might protect her from physical harm.

"I am afraid of this administration," Tripp told the Grand Jury.

I have what I consider to be well-founded fears of what they are capable of ... I had reasons to believe that the Vince Foster tragedy was not depicted accurately under oath by members of the administration ... I knew based on personal knowledge, personal observations, that they were lying under oath. So it became very fearful to me that I had information even back then that was dangerous.

"But do you have any examples of violence being done by the administration to people who were a threat to them?" asked a juror.

Tripp named Jerry Parks. "[T]he behavior in the West Wing with senior staff to the president during the time the Jerry Parks [murder report] came over the fax frightened me. He had been killed," said Tripp. The "flurry of activity," the closed-door meetings, and the "hush-hush" atmosphere in the White House all struck her as ominous and frightening.

"Maybe you had to be there," said Tripp.

[The news of Parks' death] was something they wanted to get out in front of. There was talk that this would be another body to add to the list of 40 bodies or something that were associated with the Clinton administration. At that time, I didn't know what that meant. I have since come to see such a list.

Some skeptics might discount Tripp's fears as fanciful, even hysterical. But Tripp was no hysteric. On the contrary, she had been trained to deal with stress and intrigue to a greater degree than most. According to the New York Times, Tripp worked for "highly classified Army intelligence and commando units in the 1980s," including as an aide to the top-secret Delta Force. "[I]'ve worked on the covert side of the Department of Defense," Tripp told congressional investigators. In short, Linda Tripp was a spook, a professional denizen of the intelligence underworld. Her observations should not be lightly dismissed.

Richard Poe is the investigative editor of David Horowitz's Center for the Study of Popular Culture, as well as managing editor of Horowitz's group blog Moonbat Central. The views expressed in Poe's book, "Hillary's Secret War," are the author's own, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center for the Study of Popular Culture.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial
KEYWORDS: aep; arkancide; bodycount; clintonbodycount; clintonfoundation; clintonscandals; coverup; evanspritchard; hillaryclinton; hillaryssecretwar; hitlary; hrc; impeachedpotus; jerryparks; lindatripp; mediabias; pritchard; richardpoe; stalinstyleshowtrial; thebentone; vincentfoster; whitewash; worstlady; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last
To: loreldan

"Conspiracy theories are born out of fear. I am not afraid. And I think most sane people would not be. Can you imagine an editor of a major newspaper -no matter what his/her political persuasion- sitting in his/her office trembling in fear from the possibility of retaliation..."




From my perspective, fear has nothing to do with what I am saying. I am talking about power...and access to that power. Unlike the liberal media that sends reporters to scour Texas for years based on the simplest of accusations, they did not do the same for Clinton with much more serious claims being made.

And your perspective on the media being even-handed because they did cover some scandals is also skewed. First off, they were forced to cover many of these issues since they just
grew to big. Yet, even here, the same attention was never paid, as these stories were few and far between.

Even the Lewsinsky case that you cite only became an issue after Drudge went to print with it. Before that, Newsweek was content to sit on that story...just as NBC was content to sit on the Juanita Broaderick story, even though they interviewed her. In fact, one of their excuses for not printing the story was because they didn't want to influence the Impeachment vote. Yet, these same people don't have that problem when it's a Republican, as they intentionally tried to influence an election.

I'm not even speaking so much about the Clinton Body Count, rather the fact, that you hadn't heard anything about it...just as many people didn't hear a lot of the other more outrageous accusations which were far more damaging, and at least deserved some investigation. Whether it was the untimely deaths of close Clinton associates like Ron Brown or Vince Foster, or the accusations of sexual assault and rape...the media never took the "personal" interest in these stories as they do a Republican accused of the same.

Hell, this is the same media that spent years investigating W's TANG service from 30 years ago, but never went into that same depth (and anger) WRT Clinton and his draft status, which we had proof of in the form of an affadavit from a Colonel and Clinton's own letter. They brought the Bush story up four times this year, but not once did these people go in to detail about Clinton's activities overseas during Vietnam. This has nothing to do with fear; it has to do with ideology and power...and those willing to look the other way because the ends justify the means.


101 posted on 07/29/2005 3:34:16 PM PDT by cwb (Islam is the opiate of the *asses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

To those who think this "Arkancide" evidence is looney,or coincidence,just ask any actuarial what the odds are of this many young, apparantly healthy healthy people who are connected to the Clintons meeting an untimely death.
The answer is: the odds of coincidence are about one in THREE TRILLION.


102 posted on 07/29/2005 3:45:54 PM PDT by Cincinna (BEWARE HILLARY and her HINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan
Good afternoon.
"This is the first time I've ever heard such claims..."

Where have you been for the last 14 years? The body count brought many good folk to the FreeRepublic.

Michael Frazier
103 posted on 07/29/2005 3:53:04 PM PDT by brazzaville (No surrender,no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

And here's another great example for you: Someone whispers in the media's ear that Bush may have done Cocciane 30 years ago. What does the media do; they again, head down to Texas to interview anyone they could get their hands on...inclduing the disredited individual making the claim. This was a story for over a month.

Now, let's compare that to how they treated Clinton. Not only did they make a joke out of his "I didn't inhale," most of them refused to inform the public of Roger Clinton's FBI sting tape, were he was heard saying something to the effect of..."I got to get some of this for my brother; he has a nose like a vaccum."

Clinton's drug use was substantiated by several Clinton friends (including G. Flowers) and yet they never took him to task as they did Bush. In fact, as they demanded to see the medical records of both Bush and Cheney, Clinton's refusal was accepted with no cries over "what is he hiding?" I think it's obvious why you and others don't always hear what the truth is.


104 posted on 07/29/2005 3:57:54 PM PDT by cwb (Islam is the opiate of the *asses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

Comment #105 Removed by Moderator

To: Richard Poe

If Mrs. Clinton wins the election we are going to get all this stuff again only far more extensively. The success at keeping it all “under wraps” the first time ensures that the effort will be far more ambitious in a second Clinton reign. The dintimidation and silencing will not be limited to associates who might get dangerous, to people who know-too-much. The militias will come back and will be dealt with this time and, I suspect, bloodily.


106 posted on 11/23/2007 5:29:22 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

If Mrs. Clinton wins the election we are going to get all this stuff again only far more extensively. The success at keeping it all “under wraps” the first time ensures that the effort will be far more ambitious in a second Clinton reign. The dintimidation and silencing will not be limited to associates who might get dangerous, to people who know-too-much. The militias will come back and will be dealt with this time and, I suspect, bloodily.


107 posted on 11/23/2007 5:32:19 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

You may be a long-time conservative but you are either very young or you did not pay attention in the 90s.


108 posted on 11/23/2007 5:33:06 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bookworm100
the Clintons are Clinton is the "worst person ever to be elected president."
109 posted on 11/23/2007 5:40:18 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska

I worry about how it will pan out if it is a close loss for Mrs. Clinton. I know the Clintons will not accept it. I wonder how much power they actually have to alter already proclaimed results. I suspect they do have enough real power to try it. All it might take is one USSC judge to have a serious auto accident. Flying in any aircraft is definitely a foolish act for the Republican if the election looks like it will tilt away from the Clintons.


110 posted on 11/23/2007 5:43:29 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

Rush started to discuss these things but realized early on that nothing was going to be done and that he would lose effectiveness if he continued with it because there would never be and satisfaction. By continuing to discuss something that could never have a resolution he would have become only a right wing conspiracy theorist. I cursed him at the time for “ignoring” these things but came to understand that his voice was needed for a long time and it should not be sacrificed for righteousness that could never be finally shown.


111 posted on 11/23/2007 5:47:30 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

The ones that knew are not of sufficient stature that they could get other jobs after being blacklisted by MSM.


112 posted on 11/23/2007 5:49:19 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska
Why didn't Reagan or Bush 41 start an investigation into the shenanigans going on in Arkansas while Clinton was governor?

Probably because Arkansas was regarded as a remote third world country that just happens to lie within USA borders. Why would anybody care what happens in Uganda?

113 posted on 11/23/2007 5:56:57 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

The Clinton Chinese Mafia’s need to hide from the Judicial Dept is why there was a window for 911.

Pray for W and Our Troops


114 posted on 11/23/2007 6:07:23 PM PST by bray (Think "Betray U.S." Think Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray

Gorelick’s wall.


115 posted on 11/23/2007 6:38:48 PM PST by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: REDWOOD99

Gorelick’s wall was designed to slow down the clinton investigations by not letting FBI/CIA/Police investigate together or share info. This opened the barndoor for terrorism which they didn’t want the public to know existed. 3000 deaths was a small price to keep them out of prison.

Pray for W and Our Troops


116 posted on 11/23/2007 6:47:12 PM PST by bray (Think "Betray U.S." Think Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: bray

5 bucks Sandy Burglar snagged documents that identified Hillary as the designer of the wall.


117 posted on 11/23/2007 6:49:21 PM PST by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

When she becomes President, there are enough fools and idiots who will vote for her to take the “if” out of the equation, Free Republic and its members will be her first target.


118 posted on 11/23/2007 6:53:11 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: REDWOOD99

Since he took them when he was going to testify about terrorism it is possible as well as a hundred other incriminating docs.

Pray for W and Our Troops


119 posted on 11/23/2007 6:55:23 PM PST by bray (Think "Betray U.S." Think Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

Maybe some movie time will help.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6470450895164255089

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4113276458031151696&q=vince+foster&total=70&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0


120 posted on 11/23/2007 6:56:27 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (- Attention all planets of the solar Federation--Secret plan codeword: Banana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson