Posted on 07/06/2005 10:50:06 AM PDT by 8mmMauser
Several bloggers have drawn attention to a strange lead in a Washington Post story about the Terri Schiavo autopsy results. The June 16 Post story by David Brown said that "Terri Schiavo died of the effects of a profound and prolonged lack of oxygen to her brain on a day in 1990, but what caused that event isn't known and may never be, the physician who performed her autopsy said
"
(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...
As Wampus SC notes, they are identical. Lefties in disguise, freeper sleepers, and the amateur tag team marathon here yesterday all read from the same sheet of music, it appears. Not a drop of originality to be seen anywhere, just the same tired mantras. But then they have to swarm back to the caves to refresh their mantras and get new slogans from the playbooks, and come back.
Their single drive is to stop the growing dismay at the Terri atrocity, by badgering you may see on this thread, personal attacks, or repeating of the same old saws enough so that somehow they become truth.
Truth has no meaning to them and argument is what they seek. They care not of the argument per se, but only the effects their words have. Words to them are tools, while words to us have meaning.
In a way, this is not so bad, because their constant posts keep the subject right up front despite their opposite intent. Resonable people can spot the stark contrast between their mean intent and that of us with eyes open.
The legacy of Terri grows.
8mm
You said: You don't like the outcome, so all the judges must be corrupt. I'm sure that makes sense to you.
I did not say that all judges are corrupt. I said that there are corrupt judges everywhere, which is not the same. This case was just one of many where someone's rights were trampled (in this case, lethally) by a corrupt judge. Hardly a week goes by where I don't hear about some other judge(s) giving an outrageous judgement and/or imposing some new restriction on our autonomy and liberty. The recent Supreme Court decision that private property may now be confiscated by anyone who wants to develop it in the name of "the public good" is an example. May I suggest reading Mark Levin's Men in Black for a good accounting of how out-of-control the judiciary has become.
BTW, if you think that hearsay testimony was good enough evidence on which to condemn Terri Schindler to death, may you never be arrested for robbing a convenience store when the only evidence against you is the testimony of the gang members who were loitering outside the store.
8mm
Nurse: Schiavo Blood Chemistry Indicates Possible Strangulation
I wish we could copy the whole article right here but we cannot, so hopefully you all will read it.
I am too. I think that many have been in similar situations and let their loved one die and now have to do it (be for her murder) so they don't feel guilty that they might have made a mistake (not saying they did in their particular situation)
Thanks for the ping to all the information, 8mmMauser.
There must be more in that category than we might realize. At least one of the people "on the other side" at Pinellas Park even sort of confessed that was his motivation. We have seen a few posting these threads who so much as admitted that is why they are on the wrong side.
8mm
You are most welcome. Glad to do it.
8mm
yep I agree. I could not in any way condone what was done to Terri even if it had happened in my family. Every situation is different. Some may have had a loved one who was dying (Terri was certainly not) and not far from death. I think they carry guilt for what happened to their family member. I am probably not making much sense here (not enough java yet)
We don't have all the medical records we need, but the ones we have dispose of a lot of nonsense.
For the record: there is NOTHING in Terri's medical data or in the Autopsy Report that rules out strangulation. On the contrary, several blood abnormalities strongly suggest strangulation as the cause of her cardiac arrest.
Michael was a foot taller and twice Terri's weight. If he got on her back, she didn't have a chance.
Why would we think he got on her back? (a) The position she was found, face down, arms under her reaching up to her throat; (b) the bone bruise on her right femur; (c) the compression fracture of her spine (and damage to nearby ribs). (It is unusual for ribs to be injured from behind the body.)
MS may well have pinned her down with his knees, one on her back, one on her right leg, causing the damage from (b) and (c). That leaves both hands and both forearms free for a choke hold.
That's a lie. And if you say it's true, prove it.
Get your information correct before you post something. Oh what am I thinking, that's never mattered before, so why start now.
AMEN!
syriacus, your link is to amazing stuff. I had no idea....
8mm
unbalanced
I am glad you are here and I thank you for bringing up such an important issue. Please read the above threads and link by syriacus. And read the article by the Empire Journal. It will help you even more to be fair. It is good to get as much info out as possible.
8mm
Your eyes obviously tell you what you want to believe. I'm not going to argue with you, so believe what you want. Have a good day.
See ya..
And I want to thank you and 8mmMauser for well reasoned debate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.