?
Posted on 07/04/2005 3:31:56 PM PDT by lightman
General Synod overwhelmingly calls for "full marriage equality"
Contributed by Irwin Smallwood
Monday, 04 July 2005
The UCC, a community of Christians with roots deep in the soil of societal change, took another giant leap on Monday.
General Synod 25 overwhelmingly passed a resolution in support of equal marriage rights for all people, regardless of gender. It marks the first time that one of the nation’s mainline churches has expressed support of marriages for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender persons.
Delegates wrestled with the resolution for about an hour before casting a decisive vote in favor of the resolution that was refined and recommended late Sunday by a 54-member Synod committee. The document was altered by only one amendment, which delegates readily accepted, that expressed a spirit of concern for those who must deal with the resolution's impact in the months ahead.
When debate was closed -- with only a whimper of opposition -- a hush fell over the great hall of Atlanta’s Georgia World Conference Center. The Rev. Bernice Powell Jackson, executive minister of Justice and Witness Ministries, then asked moderator Eric C. Smith, who led the proceedings, for a moment of collective prayer. Delegates prayed silently.
Moments later, when voting began, a horde of raised hands -- holding green voting cards -- told the world that the resolution had passed overwhelmingly. Afterwards, instead of loud applause, there was a dignified moment of stillness broken only by the voice of the Rev. John H. Thomas who offered a prayer.
“Lord Jesus…We give thanks for your presence, especially here this morning,” the UCC's general minister and president prayed in a soft, pastoral voice. “We have felt your warm embrace, stilling us as we tremble with joy, with hope, with fear, with disappointment…Let us use our hands not to clap, but to wipe away every tear…”
As the plenary adjourned for lunch, the mood remained as one would expect after a service of worship, rather than a session of earnest debate and serious deliberation. The most demonstrative sights were those of couples of all ages and genders locked in tearful embraces of thanksgiving for what Thomas would later also refer to as “freedom.”
Later, in a press conference, Thomas acknowledged that it was not lost on the gathering that this historic stand was taken on the nation’s Independence Day.
“On this July Fourth the General Synod of the United Church of Christ has acted courageously to declare freedom, affirming marriage equality, affirming the civil rights of same gender couples to have their relationships recognized as marriages by the state, and encouraging our local churches to celebrate and bless those marriages,” he said.
Thomas also acknowledged that the issue of marriage equality is “the source of great conflict” not only in society but also in the churches. The UCC, he said, “is no exception” and “there are clearly great differences among our own members over this.”
Synod action, he added, “does not presume a consensus of opinion among our members or our local churches, which are free and responsible to come to their own mind of this as on any other (issue). The General Synod speaks to and not for our local churches.”
When asked, Thomas declined to speculate on whether the passage of the resolution could cause some churches to leave the denomination.
During the plenary debate, an amendment to, in effect, change “marriage” to “covenantal relationship” elicited a lively exchange for a few minutes but did not come close to approval because the body felt it substantially changed the focus of the resolution. Another proposed amendment -- that failed to garner only a handful of votes -- would have postponed action until the 2007 General Synod in Hartford, Conn.
But there was ready acceptance of a friendly suggestion to insert words in a transition paragraph of the “resolves” acknowledging “the pain and struggle their passage will engender.”
The marriage equality resolution (1) affirms equal marriage rights for couples regardless of gender and declares that the government should not interfere with couples regardless of gender who choose to marry and share fully in the rights, responsibilities and commitment of legally recognized marriage; (2)affirms equal access to the basic rights, institutional protections and quality of life conferred by the recognition of marriage, (3) calls for an end to rhetoric that fuels hostility, misunderstanding, fear and hatred expressed toward gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender persons, (4) asks officers of the church to communicate the resolution to local, state and national legislators, urging them to support equal marriage rights, (5) calls upon all settings of the church to engage in serious, respectful and prayerful discussion of the covenantal relationship of marriage and equal marriage rights, (6) calls upon congregations, after prayerful, biblical, theological, and historical study, to consider adopting Wedding Policies that do not discriminate against couples based on gender, and (7) urges congregations and individuals of the UCC to prayerfully consider and support local, state and national legislation to grant equal marriage rights to couples regardless of gender, and to work again legislation, including constitutional amendments, which denies rights to couples based on gender.
What do you expect from a crowd which doesn't require its preachers to believe that Jesus is Lord.
Akin to a giant bungee leap off the lip of a 500 ft deep volcano with 800ft of bungee
The UCC resulted from the 1957 merger of the extremely WASP Congregational Christian Churches("CCC") with the ethnically Dutch and German Evangelical and Reformed Church ("E&R"). The CCC itself was a 1935 merger of the Congregational Church and the a denomination called the Christian Church.
The Congregational Church was the established church in New England and the church of the Pilgrims and the Puritans. Closely related to the Presbyterian Church in doctrine (used the Westminster Confession, etc.) but vested authority in each individual church, not some governing body. The Unitarians were a spin-off who thought the Congregational Churhes too conservative. There was an alliance with the Presbyterians in the early days of the Republic that led to most Congregational Churches outside of New England and the upper mid-west ultimately going Presbyterian. Congregational Churches were also strong on the Pacific Coast (California, Oregon, Washington) and due to missionary activity in Hawaii.
The United Church of Christ does not have to abide by Jesus's words because they are not Christian. This is the same bunch that is debating whether Jesus was God. They are in fellowship with the Episcobaalians and ELCA "Lutherans", none of whom should be allowed to label themselves as Christians. They are, in the words of the immortal Flip Wilson, members of "The Church of What's Happenin' Now".
?
They are no longer a church-just a social club.
thank you for your explanation of the UCC. I had long known that they are an extremely leftist and unorthodox church. However a few years ago I moved to New Jersey from the Midwest. I often drive by a small, old UCC church in a nearby town. It has one of those marquee-type signs that one can use to put up different messages. I was shocked to see it display things like "Jesus is the Reason for the Season" at Christmas, and other messages promoting frequent prayer and church attendance. Around these blue parts, one would expect something like that from an evangelical church, but certainly not a UCC. I guess this particular congregation must be one of the conservative holdouts in the northeast. Though it is a sad commentary on the UCC's reputation for leftism that a UCC church displaying basic Christian messages is shocking.
Once they have changed Marriage from what it is, to what they want, it will no longer be marriage, or what they wanted.
Barf to all this nonsense.
+
Indeed. UCC churches are rare in New Jersey, since that was one of the states where most of the pre-revolutionary Congregational churches ended up Presbyterian. I'm not surprised that you saw a fairly conservative one, those that remain in NJ were usually fiercely independent.
Good explanation. Thanks. I didn't know the history of the UCC.
I wonder if the 1 million number is reliable.
It may be as inflated as LA times circulation numbers. They may still count members who left rather than "paid members".
Given that the Hartford Seminary FACT survey of 2000 showed that only about 27 of UCC congregations self-identify as theologically liberal (moderately or very), and 44 percent self-identify as moderate, and 29 percent self-identify as theologically conservative (moderately to very)...surely this affirmative vote does not truly reflect the mind of the UCC. We'd do better to send each congregation a ballot than to rely on the General Synod delegates' vote as representative. The way the UCC is reporting this vote via its news service it sounds like the whole denomination has voted in favor of this resolution. The public doesn't understand the nuances of our polity....
Given that the Hartford Seminary FACT survey of 2000 showed that only about 27 of UCC congregations self-identify as theologically liberal (moderately or very), and 44 percent self-identify as moderate, and 29 percent self-identify as theologically conservative (moderately to very)...surely this affirmative vote does not truly reflect the mind of the UCC. We'd do better to send each congregation a ballot than to rely on the General Synod delegates' vote as representative. The way the UCC is reporting this vote via its news service it sounds like the whole denomination has voted in favor of this resolution. The public doesn't understand the nuances of our polity....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.