Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Emergency Synod resolution introduced on U.S. Supreme Court
The United Church of Christ ^ | July 4, 2005 | William Winslow

Posted on 07/04/2005 9:42:30 AM PDT by lightman

Emergency Synod resolution introduced on U.S. Supreme Court

Contributed by William Winslow

Sunday, 03 July 2005

In the wake of the sudden resignation of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, an emergency resolution has been introduced before Synod delegates that would urge President Bush and the U.S. Senate to use a bipartisan process of “openness and consultation” as their standard for nominating and confirming future justices.

The proposed resolution notes that O’Connor – the nation’s first female Supreme Court Justice – has been a “moderating influence” on the court. Bush has lauded her as a “discerning and conscientious judge.”

The framers of the proposed action, endorsed by seven regional Conference delegations, were deliberate in not suggesting any religious litmus test for future justices. Rather, the measure would call upon the nomination process to be “fair, truthful and beyond reproach.” The proposal still requires full Synod approval.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: cinochurch; religiousleft; scotus; supremecourt; ucc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
The United Church of Christ is headed for the shipwreck of apostasy in affirming "marriage equality" (translation: Adam and Steve in "wedlock") yet the SCOTUS vacancy is what generates an "Emergency Resolution."

The Democratic party at prayer, as usual.

1 posted on 07/04/2005 9:42:32 AM PDT by lightman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lightman

The religous left(read CULTS) strikes again!


2 posted on 07/04/2005 9:44:39 AM PDT by zzen01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

The process for confirming justices is already defined in the Constitution. "A bipartisan process of 'openness and consultation'" is just code for giving the Dems what they want. Why don't these people do something useful such as saving souls from eternal damnation? Just a thought.


3 posted on 07/04/2005 9:47:12 AM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zzen01
Screw Consultation! LOL!

Nominate Luttig!!
4 posted on 07/04/2005 9:47:32 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lightman

And so it begins...


5 posted on 07/04/2005 9:47:40 AM PDT by Only1choice____Freedom (I alone, am the chosen one. Because I alone, did the choosing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Perhaps they'd like to see Castro nominated.


6 posted on 07/04/2005 9:49:00 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

The implication is that the synod thinks the nomination process would not be conducted by measures that were “fair, truthful and beyond reproach.”

Looks like they're full of synot!


7 posted on 07/04/2005 9:49:42 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman; zzen01
Donations by members of the United Church of Christ, 2004


THE CENTER
FOR RESPONSIVE
POLITICS



Results:

21 records found in 0.4375 seconds.
 

Search Criteria:
Donor occupation: United Church
Cycle(s) selected: 2004

Start another search

Sort by Name
Sort by Date
Sort by Amount

Total for this search: $6,209

Contributor

Occupation

Date

Amount

Recipient

BAREFIELD, RUSSELL
EVANSTON,IL 60202

UNITED CHURCH OF CHR/CHURCH ADMINIS

7/12/2004

$300

DNC Services Corp

BAREFIELD, RUSSELL
EVANSTON,IL 60202

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST/ADMINISTRAT

3/13/2004

$300

Kerry, John

BAREFIELD, RUSSELL
EVANSTON,IL 60202

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST/ADMINISTRAT

7/29/2004

$300

Kerry, John

BAREFIELD, RUSSELL
EVANSTON,IL 60202

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST/ADMINISTRAT

10/12/2004

$300

DNC Services Corp

BAREFIELD, RUSSELL
EVANSTON,IL 60202

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST/ADMINISTRAT

10/29/2004

$300

DNC Services Corp

COLEMAN, EDITH MRS
SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94124

UNITED CHURCH OF CHR/ORDAINED MINIS

6/20/2003

$500

DNC Services Corp

CONOVER, PAT
SILVER SPRING,MD 20910

UNITED CHURCH OF CHR/LEGISLATIVE DI

9/14/2004

$200

DNC Services Corp

ELNES, ERIC
SCOTTSDALE,AZ 85250

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST/MINISTER

9/28/2004

$210

America Coming Together

EVANS, JANET
DARIEN,CT 06820

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST/CLERGY

11/13/2003

$200

Dean, Howard

EVANS, JANET W
DARIEN,CT 06820

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST/CLERGY

6/15/2004

$300

Kerry, John

FAST, BARBARA
COS COB,CT 06807

UNITED CHURCH WESTPO/MINISTER

10/26/2004

$214

DNC Services Corp

KING, RANDALL DOUBET
CHICAGO,IL 60640

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST

12/3/2003

$300

Obama, Barack

KIRK, JOYCE E
CLAREMONT,CA 91711

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST/PASTOR

9/27/2003

$300

Dean, Howard

LEE, LAWRENCE
TWO HARBORS,MN 55616

UNITED CHURCH OF TWO HARBORS/PASTOR

8/17/2004

$285

Moveon.org

LENNON, TARI
SAN DIEGO,CA 92126

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST

11/1/2004

$250

Clinton, Hillary Rodham

LEWIS, AMA
OAKLAND,CA 94607

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST/CLERGY

10/16/2003

$250

Kucinich, Dennis J

LOWES, PENNY DR JR
ROCHESTER,MI 48306

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST/CLERGY

10/6/2004

$250

Moveon.org

SANDERS, SUSAN
CLEVELAND HEIGHTS,OH 44121

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST/HUMANITARIA

7/27/2004

$500

Kerry, John

STENTZEL, JIM
NORTH OLMSTED,OH 44070

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST/PASTOR

6/26/2004

$250

America Coming Together

STRONG, SARAH J
SANTA FE,NM 87505

UNITED CHURCH OF SAN/TEACHER

9/21/2004

$200

DNC Services Corp

TILLOTSON, CHRISTINA
CARDIFF BY THE SEA,CA 92007

UNITED CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE/

7/14/2004

$500

Kerry, John


8 posted on 07/04/2005 9:50:34 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
Why don't these people do something useful such as saving souls from eternal damnation?

I'm not so sure that they beleive in damnation anymore, except for Rove, of course.

9 posted on 07/04/2005 9:50:57 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Perhaps they'd like to see Castro nominated.

too bad Gus Hall passed away.

10 posted on 07/04/2005 9:52:17 AM PDT by AlbertWang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lightman
“fair, truthful and beyond reproach.”

I'm for that. I hope that President Bush follows the Consitution and nominates someone that he wants on the Court and that person is qualified to be there. Then all the Senate must do is vote a 51% margin to put that person on the Court.

Not only is that fair and truthful, observing the way the Consitution is supposed to work makes it "beyond reproach".

11 posted on 07/04/2005 9:52:21 AM PDT by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

If Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Dr. Dobson, etc. pulled something similar, how fast would the media start yelping?


12 posted on 07/04/2005 9:52:54 AM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Justice O'Connor Resigns; Headline Writers Struggle to Come Up with Apocalyptic Headers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
The process for confirming justices is already defined in the Constitution.

It is amazing to watch "the other side" turn themselves and our country inside out after 208 years, simply to keep PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH from fulfilling his duties as all the Presidents before him were permitted to do without interference.

13 posted on 07/04/2005 9:53:41 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (As Iraqi's stand up - We will stand down. . President Bush, 6/28/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

LOL!!


14 posted on 07/04/2005 9:54:45 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (As Iraqi's stand up - We will stand down. . President Bush, 6/28/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody; RedRover; zzen01; rhombus; DoughtyOne; nwrep
For the latest on the UCC's impending shipwreck over "marriage equality" see the thread I just posted at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1436272/posts
15 posted on 07/04/2005 9:56:17 AM PDT by lightman (The Office of the Keys should be exercised as some ministry needs to be exorcised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: zzen01

So true!


16 posted on 07/04/2005 9:56:19 AM PDT by Jarhead1957 (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lightman
These guys are nuts. The Constitution provides all the process needed.

Besides, these people aren't even a real church ~ just a bunch of muddle headed Liberals who sit around thinking up sermons to preach to other people.

17 posted on 07/04/2005 9:59:57 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman
The framers of the proposed action, endorsed by seven regional Conference delegations, were deliberate in not suggesting any religious litmus test for future justices. Rather, the measure would call upon the nomination process to be “fair, truthful and beyond reproach.” The proposal still requires full Synod approval.

Separation of church and state...
Separation of church and state...
Separation of church and state...
Separation of church and state...
Funny I can't here the usual chanting from the left.

18 posted on 07/04/2005 10:02:23 AM PDT by oldbrowser (You lost the election.....get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Besides, these people aren't even a real church ~ just a bunch of muddle headed Liberals......

Well, "by their fruits ye shall know them".

I'm a member of the Church of Christ, which is quite conservative. I cringe when I see a pronouncement from the "United Church of Christ", because they're about as far left as one can get.

And people get the two mixed up.

19 posted on 07/04/2005 11:21:44 AM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie

You mean like the "non-instrumental" Church of Christ, or one of the other ones?


20 posted on 07/04/2005 11:25:07 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson