Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jury finds heavy smoking to be grounds for eviction
The Boston Globe ^ | By Ralph Ranalli and Jonathan Saltzman | June 16, 2005

Posted on 06/16/2005 5:33:52 AM PDT by Boston Blackie

In a case that tobacco law specialists say is one of the first of its kind in the nation, a Boston Housing Court jury ruled that a South Boston couple could be evicted from their rented water-view loft for heavy smoking, even though smoking was allowed in their lease.

The landlord who rented the Sleeper Street unit to Erin Carey and Ted Baar ordered them out within a week last November, after neighbors complained of the smoke odors filtering into their apartments.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: aclulist; billofrights; constitutionlist; pufflist; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-269 next last
To: snarks_when_bored

Ban egg salad too.


21 posted on 06/16/2005 5:58:41 AM PDT by Boston Blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Boston Blackie

who in their right mind doesn't like the smell of garlic when it's first dropped into heated olive oil?


22 posted on 06/16/2005 5:59:56 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom
... and if your actions go beyond your walls, then you are subject to eviction, etc.

Is it OK if your neighbors have pictures of cigarette smoke on their walls? You remind me of the neurotic who held up a whole city's transportation system because all the buses did not have wheelchair access.

Thanks for defining the law for the rest of us all by yourself. What say you about the nut at an an outdoor concert who had a canniption fit because someone 200 feet downwind of her lit a cigarette? Should the offender also have been "evicted"?

Neurotics are not the center of the universe, you know.

23 posted on 06/16/2005 6:00:09 AM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boston Blackie
More proof either smokers have no clue how offensive cig smoke is or smokers are supremely selfish.
24 posted on 06/16/2005 6:00:45 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boston Blackie

This has nothing to do with this thread, but I'm adding it anyway. Today is four months tobacco free for me. I quit cold turkey on 2/16 from smoking 2+ pax a day. I just realized it has been 1/3 of a year.


25 posted on 06/16/2005 6:00:53 AM PDT by TnGOP (Petey the dog is my foriegn policy advisor. He's really quite good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boston Blackie
tobacco law specialists said the decision is one of the "nation's first to declare smoking a nuisance serious enough to become grounds for eviction.

''It is very important, because it is a sign that people are more aware of how dangerous second-hand smoke is," said Professor Richard Daynard, chairman of Northeastern University's Tobacco Products Liability Project, which tracks second-hand smoke litigation nationally."

how dangerous second-hand smoke is?"

Bullsh_t. This not about "dangerous second-hand smoke."

This is a "property rights" issue and victory.

I am a landlord and I decide what can and cannot be done on my property.

If, as a renter you do not like my decision, see you later.

26 posted on 06/16/2005 6:02:09 AM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Neurotics are not the center of the universe, you know.



27 posted on 06/16/2005 6:02:13 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom

>>I have asthma, and it's certainly makes me ill.

God has it in for you, then. Face it. Don't be afraid.


28 posted on 06/16/2005 6:03:27 AM PDT by Glenn (pardon the e.e.cummings look. a busted arm makes typing seem like work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
Suppose that cigarette smoke smelled like hydrogen sulfide (rotten eggs); would defenders of indoor smoking be as likely to defend it then? Probably not. To some of us, the smell of cigarette smoke, even at a distance, is almost as offensive as the smell of rotten eggs.

Silly arguments, specially "suppose" ones, are a riot.
Suppose your gross overweight body produces an intolerable smell offending others for a radius of 100 yards. Can the rest of us have you evicted?
Suppose you start dating a martian who smells like Jabba the Hutt?

Suppose...

29 posted on 06/16/2005 6:04:56 AM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tahiti
If, as a renter you do not like my decision, see you later.

Exactly! That's why I own my own home. I'm da Boss!!!

30 posted on 06/16/2005 6:05:26 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TnGOP

congrats man. from what i understand the first weeks the worst.


31 posted on 06/16/2005 6:05:30 AM PDT by tomakaze (Cuius testiculos habes, habeas cardia et cerebellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS
The difference is that garlic is arguably good for you and smoke is not.

Cigarette stench nor garlic odor stop at the confines of an individuals apartment wall. Some people find garlic as offensive as cigarettes. Does that justify banning garlic?

32 posted on 06/16/2005 6:05:30 AM PDT by Boston Blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Boston Blackie
The neighbor wanted 'ethnic' cooking banned in the entire complex.

So, what happened?

33 posted on 06/16/2005 6:05:41 AM PDT by tnlibertarian ("In my opinion, they have no rights, except a safe return to their homeland. - "Robert Vazquez")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Boston Blackie
''It is very important, because it is a sign that people are more aware of how dangerous second-hand smoke is," said Professor Richard Daynard, chairman of Northeastern University's Tobacco Products Liability Project, which tracks second-hand smoke litigation nationally."

Such a crock. Like these guys really CARE about our health and the health of others. If that were the case, they would be going after the Drug companies who continue, each day, to pump man-made substances into innocent victims, who believe what their doctor has told them.

Why not go after the real problem? Lies presented to the public?

AND - if smoking was allowed in the building - why was that not pushed in this case? Apparently the amount of smoking was not stated in the lease, just permitted.

The way Jury's seem to think these days baffles the mind in some cases. 'Just the facts, please ma'am.' Leave out the propaganda, and we may get somewhere with justice.

Who am I kidding. JK

34 posted on 06/16/2005 6:06:56 AM PDT by Just Kimberly (Always proud, Always American, Always Trust in God...HOOAH!!( and Terri - we will never forget.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tahiti
I am a landlord and I decide what can and cannot be done on my property.

I agree..........and that should extend to all business people.

35 posted on 06/16/2005 6:08:19 AM PDT by Gabz (My give-a-damn is busted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom

It climbs over walls and under doors. Comes in through windows and sneaks through holes. We share the air with a virtual potpourri of car exhaust, middle eastern immigrant body stank, obnoxious colognes, perfumes, deodorants, hairspray, footspray, butt powder, septic foulness, sewer gas, cooking odors (there's a certain Garlicy restaurant in New Jersey that comes to mind), cow flatulence, and cigarette smoke. We can't legislate against all of these, but it's fine with you to single out one of them. What should I do if I was your neighbor and became ill whenver you had your buddies from the Mosque over for some barbecued goat? </rant>


36 posted on 06/16/2005 6:09:46 AM PDT by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dmz
who in their right mind doesn't like the smell of garlic when it's first dropped into heated olive oil?

There is no such thing as too much garlic, IMHO.

37 posted on 06/16/2005 6:10:11 AM PDT by Boston Blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
More proof either smokers have no clue how offensive cig smoke is or smokers are supremely selfish.

Why do you friendless controlling types always miss the obvious third alternative:

More proof that a much larger percentage of the American population is subject to delusions of grandeur and afflicted by serious neuroses?

Numerous, impartial studies have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that simply the smell of cigarette smoke is harmless to normal, physically and mentally healthy human beings.

38 posted on 06/16/2005 6:10:11 AM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Boston Blackie

As a reformed smoker, I say this is going too far. If the lease permits smoking in your apartment, then I think there are other issues we don't know about.

While I do not find the smell of garlic offensive, (fried foods, especially in the heat can make me vomit) would never in a million years try to prevent someone from engaging in "ethnic" cooking. That's as stupid as trying to force everybody to be vegetarians!


39 posted on 06/16/2005 6:11:44 AM PDT by tob2 (Old Fossil and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Boston Blackie

LOL Your kidding!

No hope for the catfish fry neighbors.: )


40 posted on 06/16/2005 6:13:07 AM PDT by oceanperch (Strategerist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-269 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson