Skip to comments.
Jury finds heavy smoking to be grounds for eviction
The Boston Globe ^
| By Ralph Ranalli and Jonathan Saltzman
| June 16, 2005
Posted on 06/16/2005 5:33:52 AM PDT by Boston Blackie
In a case that tobacco law specialists say is one of the first of its kind in the nation, a Boston Housing Court jury ruled that a South Boston couple could be evicted from their rented water-view loft for heavy smoking, even though smoking was allowed in their lease.
The landlord who rented the Sleeper Street unit to Erin Carey and Ted Baar ordered them out within a week last November, after neighbors complained of the smoke odors filtering into their apartments.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: aclulist; billofrights; constitutionlist; pufflist; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-269 next last
To: Boston Blackie
That is effing ridiculous, especially since it was allowed by their lease.
2
posted on
06/16/2005 5:35:23 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(The Dems have put all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
To: Boston Blackie
One day soon, every smoker will have to smoke withing a positive-pressure, super filtering booth to avoid offending someone or breaking a law.
3
posted on
06/16/2005 5:36:37 AM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: theDentist
Smoking is allowed but only 2 cigarettes per person per hour...
4
posted on
06/16/2005 5:37:13 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
(" I have a great team that is going to beat George W. Bush" John Kerry -2004)
To: theDentist
Really? I live in an apartment above a heavy smoker, and it simply rises into my apartment. I have asthma, and it's certainly makes me ill.
In addition, my apartment smells like I am a heavy smoker.
Now you tell me, since I don't choose to smoke, what the solution is?
It's either 1. He goes, or 2. The landlord releases me from my lease.
Remember, your rights stop where my body begins. In this case you could say your rights stop where your apartment walls end, and if your actions go beyond your walls, then you are subject to eviction, etc.
5
posted on
06/16/2005 5:38:38 AM PDT
by
1stFreedom
(1)
To: Boston Blackie
ncluding a ventilation unit patched together with duct tape
Duhhhh I wonder why they call it "duct" tape?
6
posted on
06/16/2005 5:39:25 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Who owns this car with the peace sign, the mag wheels, and four on the floor?)
To: SheLion
you're going to love this one!
7
posted on
06/16/2005 5:42:12 AM PDT
by
jocon307
(Can we close the border NOW?)
To: theDentist
Article says:
"the jury found that the couple's heavy smoking violated a more general clause banning 'any nuisance; any offensive noise, odor or fumes; or any hazard to health.' "
The smoke and odor were invading the neighboring apartments. When I rent an apartment I like it to be free of my neighbors' noxious odors. It's like loud music or other noises: you can make noise, but not so much that you disturb the neighbors. These smokers could smoke, but not so much that they disturb the neighbors.
8
posted on
06/16/2005 5:43:06 AM PDT
by
cracker
To: Boston Blackie
This is the next front for the smoking nazis. The latest public service ad is sponsored by mysmokefreeapartment.com . It's a way for tenants to petition the building owner to make it smoke free. That is, to throw out the smokers ala the restaurants.
The only good thing about the link is that it's dead.
9
posted on
06/16/2005 5:47:52 AM PDT
by
spudsmaki
To: Boston Blackie
Did clear definition of "Heavy Smoking" come out of this enlightened decision?
10
posted on
06/16/2005 5:49:55 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
To: cracker
Agreed. This is the precedent-setter that the Smoking Nazis have been praying for.
11
posted on
06/16/2005 5:50:12 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(The Dems have put all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
To: 1stFreedom
Remember, your rights stop where my body begins. In this case you could say your rights stop where your apartment walls end, and if your actions go beyond your walls, then you are subject to eviction, etc.Reminds me of a battle my brother-in-law had in his condo in Florida....neighbor complaining about the aroma of garlic when my brother-in-law made spaghetti sauce. The neighbor wanted 'ethnic' cooking banned in the entire complex.
To: 1stFreedom
re:Now you tell me, since I don't choose to smoke, what the solution is?
suck it up and buy a house if it bothers you that bad. Apartment living has always been a pain in the arse.
too much farging whining these days.
13
posted on
06/16/2005 5:53:08 AM PDT
by
tomakaze
(Cuius testiculos habes, habeas cardia et cerebellum.)
To: clee1
I think you mean Negative pressure.
14
posted on
06/16/2005 5:53:47 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Who owns this car with the peace sign, the mag wheels, and four on the floor?)
To: Boston Blackie; SheLion; Gabz; Just another Joe
15
posted on
06/16/2005 5:54:30 AM PDT
by
nothingnew
(I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
To: Boston Blackie
The difference is that garlic is arguably good for you and smoke is not.
16
posted on
06/16/2005 5:55:28 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Who owns this car with the peace sign, the mag wheels, and four on the floor?)
To: Boston Blackie
The lease should have said no smoking allowed. That being said, smokers don't just impact their own insides; their smoke diffuses into the surrounding atmosphere, and then seeps through cracks in walls and through ductwork until it lends an odor to an entire building. Suppose that cigarette smoke smelled like hydrogen sulfide (rotten eggs); would defenders of indoor smoking be as likely to defend it then? Probably not. To some of us, the smell of cigarette smoke, even at a distance, is almost as offensive as the smell of rotten eggs.
To: jocon307; Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; MeeknMing; steve50; Cantiloper; metesky; kattracks; ...
you're going to love this one! Oh I'm sure. LOL! The smoking threads sure bring out the CINO's.
18
posted on
06/16/2005 5:55:38 AM PDT
by
SheLion
(Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
To: HEY4QDEMS
19
posted on
06/16/2005 5:56:03 AM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: spudsmaki
20
posted on
06/16/2005 5:57:37 AM PDT
by
SheLion
(Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-269 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson