Skip to comments.
Jury reaches a verdict in the Jackson case. (Update - Not Guilty ALL Counts)
FOXMSNBCCNN
Posted on 06/13/2005 12:36:01 PM PDT by Dog
Just breaking...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barfalert; breakinghard; childmolestation; childmolester; deviancy; deviant; endtimes; freakshow; homo; homosexualagenda; jacko; jackson; jackson5; jacksonfive; jesusjuice; jurynullification; justicedenied; keep; michaeljackson; pedophile; pedophilia; perpwalk; perversion; pervert; perverts; sexabuse; sexualdeviancy; sicko; thriller; wife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,681-1,700, 1,701-1,720, 1,721-1,740 ... 2,841-2,846 next last
To: longtermmemmory
I don't agree in this case. Juries are also made up of dumb people, that is why some of them vote democrat.
To: whoever
I knew he would not be found guilty. The case against him was weak. The D.A. screwed it up rather badly. So I am not surprised. He is a child molester. He cant help himself. He will do it again. He eventually will get caught.
What worries me is that all those people who where there waving flags, crying and cheering, and one woman letting doves fly for every count of not guilty actually will be walking amongst us once again.
Oh well, the people of California get what they deserve. And thats coming from someone from the land of Ted Kennedy.
To: All
Did anyone here actually think a California Jury could find someone guilty of such a serious offense? The jury is probably smoking a joint with Jackson now.
1,703
posted on
06/13/2005 2:47:04 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
To: Fester Chugabrew
Sounds like a lot of people on FR "convicted" MJ on the basis that he is: a) a celebrity, and b) weird beyond description.
Pretty much sums it up.Sounds to me like the jury gave MJ a pass precicely because he IS (a)a celebrity.
1,704
posted on
06/13/2005 2:47:10 PM PDT
by
Fudd Fan
(McCain is still scum)
To: TheOtherOne
No, I cannot, anymore than I can tell myself that the O.J. jury looked at all the evidence and didn't think he was guilty.
To: TheBigB; All
CBS NEWS REPORTS...MICHAEL JACKSON WINS FLORIDA! Al Gorum demands RECOUNT!!!!
To: longtermmemmory
Seriously folks, prosecutors are FAR from paragons of virtue, quite the opposite No kidding! Prosecutors are, after all, politicians. Worse than that, they are politicians who are also lawyers!
Think of that prosecutor in DeLay's district, the prosector in the Rush Limbaugh case, Elliot Spitzer.
These guys are ambitious, power hungry pols with a license to ruin lives.
To: Enterprise
13 minutes to lift off!
LOL!!!
1,708
posted on
06/13/2005 2:47:40 PM PDT
by
Dashing Dasher
(To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of FReepers...)
To: Lunkhead_01
Nah, the DA would be the 3rd to the lowest. The 2nd lowest is Ms. ADA and the lowest in class rank is the prosecutor.
To: Enterprise
1,701 replies · 118,635+ views (IMPRESSIVE!!!)
1,710
posted on
06/13/2005 2:48:03 PM PDT
by
Enterprise
(Coming soon from Newsweek: "Fallujah - we had to destroy it in order to save it.")
To: cicero's_son
That said, if all twelve jurors concluded that he wasn't guilty.... In a non capitial case, does a not guilty verdict have to be unanimous?
To: Howlin
I can say what I think, but apparently the Jackson Faction needs to call in the mods to shut me up. I see that. Sigh! You haven't said anything I disagreed with.
1,712
posted on
06/13/2005 2:48:13 PM PDT
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
To: Howlin
I swear, if does one of his ridiculous, gay dance moves, I'm gonna vomit.
To: AzaleaCity5691
and in general, if someone has a record of ripping off people in order to make a living, I'm not gonna trust anything they have to say. Are you talking about the Jackson family of grifters?
To: Yaelle
MJ does not even start to unsnap the little boy's fly until he has read the mother's police and credit reportsSad, but so true.
1,715
posted on
06/13/2005 2:48:29 PM PDT
by
Fudd Fan
(McCain is still scum)
To: El Gato
What about the other charges, such as providing alcohol to a minor? Did the evidence of those things also depend entirely on the credibility of the same witnesses? I didn't follow it closely enough to know.
I'd think though, that if you are going to find the kid unbelievable about any of it, you might find him unbelievable on all of it. Just a guess.
To: SF Republican
He cannot be brought up on charges for the crimes (to the specific victims) that he was just "cleared" of.
He CAN be charged for other individual illegal sexual molestation crimes.
IMHO, he will be charged for other similar crimes with different victims by others who will come forward.
There have to be others out there.
But, that is just my personal prediction. This will not be the last MJ trial.
To: All
Sad MJ was found not guilty. I think he is guilty, but the Prosecutions witness was bad. What a shame.
1,718
posted on
06/13/2005 2:48:51 PM PDT
by
Halls
To: tobyhill
How is it that on the East Coast, they can put Martha Stewart in jail and MJ walks free ? Is it a gender bias ?
To: Fudd Fan
I found him guilty because he is a 46 yr old man sleeping with children not his and that is child abuse because it crosses boundaries! You can argue about all the technicalities you want, but that is child abuse.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,681-1,700, 1,701-1,720, 1,721-1,740 ... 2,841-2,846 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson