Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force Cadet E-Mails Religious Quotes
The Washington Post ^ | 1 June 2005 | Robert Weller

Posted on 06/01/2005 9:18:27 AM PDT by pickemuphere

DENVER -- On the eve of his graduation, the top cadet at the Air Force Academy sent out a religious-themed e-mail to thousands of fellow cadets, even as the school is grappling with complaints that some evangelical Christians are harassing others at the school.

The Associated Press obtained a copy of the e-mail sent Tuesday by Wing Commander Nicholas Jurewicz to the freshmen, sophomore and junior classes, which is about 3,000 cadets. "Wing commander" is the title held by the top senior at the school in military ranking.

Jurewicz lists his favorite quotations in the message, including several about Jesus. One quotation, "Bear one another's burdens, and so you will fulfill the law of Christ," is a biblical verse.

The academy has been under investigation because of complaints that evangelical Christians have harassed cadets who do not share their faith, in violation of the constitutional separation of church and state.

Cadets have been required to attend religious tolerance seminars, during which they have been reminded that Air Force policy bans the use of official e-mails for personal messages.

"We will look into it and if he violated any Air Force or academy policy we will take appropriate action after we've reviewed it," academy spokesman Johnny Whitaker said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: afa; cnim
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-215 next last
To: StonyBurk
ave (sic) read and reread my posted reply and nowhere did I claim your reply had squat to do with religion.don't get your panties in a bunch crunch.

so (sic) is buying one of these machines that hook one up to the internet.Why the infidels and athiests will be as described in Scripture-ever learning but never coming to the knowledge of the Truth.

Your above response is so incoherently bible-thumping that I basically still don't have a clue as to WTF you were saying, except that it has something to do with infidels, atheists, Scripture and Truth.

161 posted on 06/01/2005 12:17:23 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws spawned the federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Cogadh na Sith
So you do lead Christian employees differently.

Only as I mentioned in my other post. Only in terms of personalizing my approach to EACH employee.

That's not a recipe for success in an organization.

In the way that you're worried about, you're exactly right. I'm agreeing with you that it shouldn't be that way; I'm just saying that there is a different way.

I was in a unit that had a Mormon clique.

It tore the unit apart....


Sorry to hear that. Of course, I wouldn't limit that sort of behavior to Mormons. Observe conservatives on liberal college faculties, and see what happens...
162 posted on 06/01/2005 12:18:46 PM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: usslsm51; gogogodzilla
And in like manner, he requires and expects of all offers and soldiers not engaged in actual duty, a punctual attendance of Divine services, to implore the blessing of Heaven upon the means used for our safety and defense." General Order issued by George Washington the day after he took command of the Continental Army.

It doesn't specifically say 'Baptist' or 'Lutheran' or 'Catholic' or 'C of E' or even 'Christian' does it?

It doesn't say 'blessing of Allah' or 'Jesus', does it?

Even then they understood what 'freedom of worship' means....

163 posted on 06/01/2005 12:19:46 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (Steel Bonnets Over the Border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Cogadh na Sith

At last, reason!

" . . . there forms a perception" is the problem! Whose perception, and is it correctly formed? Plainly, no, repeat NO, "rewards," "consideration," whatever, should be attached to any religion or its practice, period. But the perception? Perception be damned. We're right back in mire of PC.


164 posted on 06/01/2005 12:21:57 PM PDT by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Mach9

Paganism?
Where did I say anything about paganism?
My reply was in reference to the post about Tocqueville's writings about American Hellfire and Brimstone!
That Hellfire and Brimstone was the direct result of an act of nature...The Leonids.
...


165 posted on 06/01/2005 12:22:57 PM PDT by mugs99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Mach9
Plainly, no, repeat NO, "rewards," "consideration," whatever, should be attached to any religion or its practice, period.

Correct, but that is what is happening right now in the AF. It's not just a perception.

166 posted on 06/01/2005 12:24:08 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (Steel Bonnets Over the Border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Cogadh na Sith
It sounds more like one expressing his views, which happen to be protected by the first amendment.

Not on the official e-mail network it ain't....

What about Chaplains in the service? Can they send religious emails on the official e-mail network and not violate your interpretation of the first amendment? For example: A list of services (where Jesus is worshiped)?
167 posted on 06/01/2005 12:25:24 PM PDT by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
let me get this straight, if a Christian talks about his faith it's against the law, but a muslim can say or do anything he wants, and its constitutionally protected?

That is the liberal secular view of the matter, so vigorously pursued on this thread ...

168 posted on 06/01/2005 12:28:00 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Don't have a clue what the WTF your panties are in such a bunch about other than the fact that you apparantly are like Mugsie suffering from the romans 1:21 syndrom. In Basic
training Ft.Campbell KY June 1969 we were trained to recognize the General Orders and expectaitons of General George Washington. And we were marched to Chapel every Sunday- unless we preferred being PLO. Clearly Washington
had done something to invoke the Blessings of Heaven for he
took on a world power and Won if it were good 'nuff for the Patriots and Christian Soldiers who secured our dearest Rights and Liberties then it ought be so even today.One still has Free will -One can go to Hell or be PLO
if they choose to reject God.


169 posted on 06/01/2005 12:28:26 PM PDT by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Cogadh na Sith
But as soon as there forms a perception that the professing Christians are being rewarded, it's all over....

Where that perception is fairly rooted, I agree. In those cases, I would again point the manager to Proverbs 3:27: "Do not withhold good from those who deserve it, when it is in your power to act."
170 posted on 06/01/2005 12:29:57 PM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

Comment #171 Removed by Moderator

To: Cogadh na Sith

Given the obvious FACT that American military leaders have almost universally been both very religious AND very diverse in their faiths it is apparent to all but the willfully blind that such divisions and diversions have played no significant role in our history.

Maybe you have another country in mind.


172 posted on 06/01/2005 12:32:24 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DocRock
What about Chaplains in the service? Can they send religious emails on the official e-mail network and not violate your interpretation of the first amendment? For example: A list of services (where Jesus is worshiped)?

Yeah, but it has to be a list of all services--that is official and informational, not religious. How are your Jewish troops gonna feel if you only list the Christian services?

The AF is having trouble with this right now....

173 posted on 06/01/2005 12:32:49 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (Steel Bonnets Over the Border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: pickemuphere

Amazing. We get junk mail all the time and we just toss it. If this person sent this out why not just toss it if it is not important to you or meaningful to you? No big deal to me.


174 posted on 06/01/2005 12:33:14 PM PDT by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than any of us will ever know! :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
It amazes me how much people write about about a subject they know little about. Yes he quoted Christian beliefs, he also quoted a Muslim, Buddha, Jews, pagans and probably a number of atheists in a 22 page compilation of quotes that he found beneficial to him over his four years at the Academy. Are we so intellectually bankrupt that we have to eliminate Christian sayings? The MSM was duped on this one.
175 posted on 06/01/2005 12:33:59 PM PDT by affan76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

These little tidbits blown up into a "sex scandal" is the result of too LITTLE Christianity not too MUCH. The latter is the LEAST of the Academy and military's problems.

Only a hysterically anti-religious RATmedia would even be talking about this non-problem.


176 posted on 06/01/2005 12:50:33 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

Right on target. Good post.


177 posted on 06/01/2005 12:55:50 PM PDT by Sam's Army (Fight them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: GatorPaul

And he had a hell of a temper so he would be disqualified from being the UN Ambassador.


178 posted on 06/01/2005 12:57:40 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Sam's Army

bttt


179 posted on 06/01/2005 12:58:19 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

"These little tidbits blown up into a "sex scandal" is the result of too LITTLE Christianity not too MUCH."

Wrong. Several of the evildoers (male AND female) were supposedly "good Christians."


180 posted on 06/01/2005 12:59:05 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson