Posted on 05/26/2005 4:24:33 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
I might add regarding post #36, an IV may be appropriately added to my coffee pot to correct my grammar.
Why am I a troll because I disagree with him?
Many thanks, PAIC. I've hung in there so far with softwarecreator, but I don't feel that he has seriously responded to my evidence of Katie's liberalism or my justification for tracking liberal bias at Today.
You're talking all wrong to my guy glgb. It's the wrong tone.
Katie Couric "outed" by Whoopi Goldberg on Monday's Today -- outed as a closet "pro-choice" abortion marcher (MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER CYBERALERT)
Yes, I did read the post, and I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on the appropriateness of the analogy.
You're welcome, and I agree. I feel he is trying to bait you. Take care!
Please explain why it is "lame" to suggest that, just as it's worthwhile for the CIA to track military opponents, it's worthwhile for others, including myself, to track and expose political opponents?
I guess money talks.
Money IS the bottom line when it comes to abortions!!
BTW Welcome to FR
I disagree. Apparently, you don't understand how the heart of a $7500 an hour greenie baby-killer works. I submit that glgb has observed the wenchlette long enough to divine her intent with some accuracy.
I agree 100% with you GLGB and will never think of questioning one of your posts again, lest I be a 'TROLL' or 'DISRUPTOR'.
I will move on to another thread and leave you great folks to continue as you were.
Then why watch
Keeps your friends close
and your enemies even closer!!!
Before you go, please indicate whether you read the link posted at #64 in which Whoopi Goldberg makes clear that she and Katie both participated in a pro-choice march.
Well put.
Forget it.
You and your friends are right, I am wrong ... let's leave it at that before someone contacts a moderator or whatever.
I humbly apologize for disagreeing with your viewpoint.
I never called you a troll or disruptor, swc. Did you read the MRC piece on Couric and Whoopi Goldberg? It shows that Couric is a barely closeted pro-choice type. Wahhhing over an alligator while cheerleading pulling the heads off full-term babies is an incongruity, to say the least.
Thusly, glgb can say "I think it is entirely fair and revelatory to point out the moral inconsistency of her positions", because the case HAS been made over many years. I myself like using the charge of "hypocrisy", the main weapon of the Left these days.
Disagreeing is one thing--people respectfully disagree all the time here.
Repeatedly baiting a person is another thing, and that's what crosses the line into being a disruptor.
You asked for proof that Katie is pro-choice. You got that proof in a previous post. Did you read the link?
I would suggest you heed your tag line.
And by the way, do you have proof of your contention that Katie was pro-life or at least neutral regarding whether or not Terri Schiavo should be starved to death? Demanding proof is a two-way street.
"gee, I hope it will be released and be OK,"
Sure you do Katie- you're just wanting it to be fattened up into a nice shoe-belt-purse combo for you.
Well you know, those aren't really humans, just a blob of cells.
< /liberal reasoning to make self feel better about murder>
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.