Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Democrats Got Rolled in the Compromise...But Don't Know It Yet! (VANITY)
Free Republic | May 25, 2005 | Gary L. Livacari

Posted on 05/25/2005 6:28:42 AM PDT by GaryL

All you conservatives out there – listen up! Take a deep breath! Climb down from the ledge! Chill out! Things are not as bad as they seem! As a matter of fact, things are downright rosy!

In spite of what all the conservative pundits are saying – including Rush Limbaugh, Bill Bennett, Laura Ingraham, Thomas Sowell – we did not get rolled in Monday’s deal with the Democrats. As a matter of fact, it’s just the opposite. The Democrats have been taken to the cleaners…only they don’t know it yet! As usual, they have followed Teddy Kennedy’s advice and he has led them into another political disaster.

The problem is that no one – including our side - is looking at the big picture. What actually happened as a result of this deal is that, for all practical purposes, the filibuster as a means to obstruct judicial nominees is dead! Isn’t that what we wanted in the first place? And like Reagan winning the Cold War without firing a shot, we achieved this goal without having to initiate the so-called “nuclear option,” and thus avoided taking the huge hit from the mainstream media. The MSM was waiting with bated breath, ready to pounce on the Republicans like a cat on a cornered mouse. Can’t you just hear them repeating the mantra “…and the Republicans actually changed the rules in the middle of the debate!”

In the first place, we now will get confirmed the three nominees deemed by the Democrats to be the most “extreme”: Pricilla Owens, Janice Rodgers Brown, and William Pryor. OK. Follow me on this. If these three are the most “extreme” - by the Democrats own definition - what does that make the others? That’s right…moderates! Does anyone really believe that the Democrats will now resurrect the filibuster to obstruct “moderate judges”? Of course not! Majority Leader Frist has vowed that all of the remaining judges will be put forward for votes promptly, possibly within a week or two. Should the Democrats be foolish enough to filibuster any of these “moderates,” he has also vowed again to ignite the “nuclear option.” All the centrist Republicans who supported the agreement – including Susan Collins and Lindsey Graham – have likewise vowed to support Frist should it become necessary. Let me see…they give up the filibuster while we retain the right to use the “nuclear option” against the filibuster and have become united in our opposition to it. Sounds like a victory to me!

How about the seven Democratic “centrist” senators? I doubt very seriously that any of them would support a filibuster at this stage of any kind, most especially against the remaining “moderate” judges. Guess what. These people have been looking for a way to dissociate themselves from the Teddy Kennedy wing of their party… and now they have found it. Trust me…THE FILIBUSTER IS DEAD! Without these seven senators, the Democrats couldn’t filibuster Attila the Hun!

And don’t you see how silly the Democrats are looking already? What was all the fuss about Pricilla Owens in the first place that they had to block her for four years? This so-called “extremist” will be confirmed today with a sizeable number of their own party voting for her! That’s some “extremist!” In other words, they’ve proven again for all to see that you can’t trust their judgment on who is really “extremist” and who isn’t. Like the little boy who cried wolf, their use of the label “extremist” has a definite “hollow ring” to it.

Let’s recap: the Republicans have effective eliminated the filibuster without taking the huge media hit, while letting it be know that they retain the threat of the “nuclear option,” with their seven senators on record as supporting Frist should the Democrats be foolish to try the filibuster again. In addition, the Republicans appear as the “moderates” in the debate, willing to try compromise to avoid a senate showdown. As an added side benefit, John McClain – by taking the lead on this and being so willing to side with the Democrats – has shown once again that he can’t be trusted and for all practical purposes has committed political suicide. Can anyone imagine him winning a single Republican primary in 2008? As usual the media has got it wrong again, making McCain the winner and Frist the loser.

All in all, not a bad day’s work!


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; compromise; dems; filibuster; judges; politics; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-160 next last
To: EQAndyBuzz

I'll just go and get me another cup of coffee. Apparently I don't have enough caffine in my system. :-)


61 posted on 05/25/2005 7:19:14 AM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: GaryL

"Let me see…they give up the filibuster while we retain the right to use the “nuclear option” against the filibuster and have become united in our opposition to it. Sounds like a victory to me!"

I'm trying to follow your logic but having a problem! Why did we "retain the right to use the 'nuclear option' if they (Dems) gave up the filibuster?"

The Dems didn't give up squat! This would all be a mute point by the end of this day (Wednesday) if Republicans would have just carried on as if nothing changed. We had the votes!!! It would have all been academic and we would be seeing the nuclear explosion today, and that would have been the end of this discussion. But no, we have to keep playing tiddly-winks with the Dems for who knows how long and who knows what is going to change in the meantime. Kicking this can down the road has served no useful purpose for anyone paying attention to this.


62 posted on 05/25/2005 7:20:58 AM PDT by Prolifeconservative (If there is another terrorist attack, the womb is a very unsafe place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I have a question for Mr Livacari. Do you have your fingers crossed as you are walking and whistling past that cemetery?
63 posted on 05/25/2005 7:21:11 AM PDT by Bar-Face
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GaryL

Now that this gang of seven pubs have, in their words, "saved the Senate" we should not be surprised if they elect to get together to "save the Senate" again...now that they realize they disproportionate power in a divided Senate they can weild as majoritity makers.


64 posted on 05/25/2005 7:22:02 AM PDT by kimoajax (Rack'em & Stack'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL
Good job, one ot the best vanities ever.

The Democrats at the eleventh hour, threw in the towel, declared victory and melted away.

Now Frist is sitting there with the 'fillibuster' card and if need be, it can be applied in real time. To boot we got to flush out and spotlight Senators in the Republican Party that, IMO, are on the dole.

65 posted on 05/25/2005 7:23:36 AM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Remember now - she is a woman - dems will start thinking of the commercials of themselves voting against a woman in the next voting cycle...

You mean the way Dems have been "bothered" by accusations in commercials that they didn't back Condoleeza Rice, a Black and a Woman?

Oh, wait...that's right, the Dems weren't bothered by those accusations in commercials in the last voting cycle.

Maybe we can guess their future behavior based upon their past behavior, eh? Here's a free clue: Dems don't give a rat's behind about their little factions when the big picture is in play. Any one woman or any one black has been tossed over the side when Dems thought it necessary in the past and they'll do it again and again and again with impunity.

66 posted on 05/25/2005 7:23:58 AM PDT by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Tony Snow thinks 3 and maybe 4 (Collins) would support the constitutional option when it is needed. Collins is getting alot more phone calls than she anticipated.


67 posted on 05/25/2005 7:33:55 AM PDT by b4its2late (It's frustrating when you know all the answers, but nobody bothers to ask you the questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
Heard from Arizonian FR folk there that he won handily with 70-75% of vote!

He ran unapposed last time (last year). He's not up for re-election now till 2010.

68 posted on 05/25/2005 7:35:12 AM PDT by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: An American In Dairyland
Here's a free clue: Dems don't give a rat's behind about their little factions when the big picture is in play. Any one woman or any one black has been tossed over the side when Dems thought it necessary in the past and they'll do it again and again and again with impunity.

And here's a bit of free information about the reality of national politics these days: this kind of attitude has utterly destroyed the Democrat Party. That's exactly why the party's influence in politics has been in a steep decline for the last 25 years -- and it's gotten so bad that they can't even maintain any relevance at all on one of the key issues of the day without getting seven Republicans to prop up their numbers for them.

69 posted on 05/25/2005 7:35:26 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
But the fact is, the next judicial nominee that comes up that Harry Reid and the Swimmer don't like, they'll filibuster him/her. Period.

I agree. All this 'compromise' does is kick the can down the road until Bush nominates a justice to the Supreme Court. THAT will be a circus. ANYBODY that Bush nominates will be described by the Left as 'out of the mainstream', and a fillibuster is sure to follow.

Hopefully the Rinos will come home on the rule change vote is taken at that time...

70 posted on 05/25/2005 7:37:02 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

"they can't even maintain any relevance at all"

Let me know when William Meyers and Henry Saad take their seats on the appeals courts.


71 posted on 05/25/2005 7:38:28 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi
The fillibuster is being saved for Supreme Court nominees.

That is exactly correct. This deal is an unmitigated disaster. They had the numbers and they chickened out. Disgraceful.

72 posted on 05/25/2005 7:39:14 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: don'tbedenied
proof will be in the pudding - the above is predicated on the wuss-publican senators being able to exercise an effective and masculine response in the face of future dhimmicrat (and MSM-enabled...) sophistry -- past history tells me I'd better sit down and wait for that, cuz I'll get aaaaawfffullll tired standing around for it.
73 posted on 05/25/2005 7:40:19 AM PDT by CGVet58 (God has granted us Liberty, and we owe Him Courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
You might ask how long W has been in the White House and how many years this logjam has affected his ability to place judges on appellate courts and how many years he has left. I'm not so much angry about this weeks' "compromise" as I am over the lost opportunities for conservatives.
74 posted on 05/25/2005 7:42:28 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: GaryL
Rush Limbaugh, Bill Bennett, Laura Ingraham, Thomas Sowell and I disagree with you.

Common sense will get you every time.

75 posted on 05/25/2005 7:49:28 AM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An American In Dairyland

>Maybe we can guess their future behavior based upon their past behavior, eh? Here's a free clue: Dems don't give a rat's behind about their little factions when the big picture is in play. Any one woman or any one black has been tossed over the side when Dems thought it necessary in the past and they'll do it again and again and again with impunity.<

All that matters to this deal is what 5 of the 7 Dems do.If 5 vote with Republicans their is no fillibuster.This deal has seperated Lieberman and others from the Looney Left.They also make it earier for Spaceman Nelson to vote his self-intrest which is to become more moderate before2006.Their are about 35 Looney lefty's in the Senate if 50% of the others vote for cloture the Loonies are impotent.It may turn out that cutting these guys safely out of the heard is the best political move the GOP could make.Keep your powder dry .


76 posted on 05/25/2005 7:53:04 AM PDT by Blessed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: GaryL

Sounds plausible to me, but if Frist backs down on this when it becomes necessary, then he is 100% finished as a Leader of any stripe.


77 posted on 05/25/2005 7:53:37 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL
Does anyone really believe that the Democrats will now resurrect the filibuster to obstruct “moderate judges”?

In a word: Yes.

They will simply call them extremists in the future.

78 posted on 05/25/2005 7:56:28 AM PDT by sharktrager (The masses will trade liberty for a more quiet life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

It won't be 80-20, it will be something like 52-47. Where does this 80-20 fantasy come from?


79 posted on 05/25/2005 7:57:04 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

He's not saying that. He's saying that the fact that Clinton wasn't removed saved Bush from having to run against Gore as an incumbent President.


80 posted on 05/25/2005 8:00:43 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson