Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Predators & Pornography. A disturbing link.
NRO ^ | May 19, 2005, 8:15 a.m. | By Penny Nance

Posted on 05/19/2005 11:05:47 AM PDT by .cnI redruM

On February 2, 2003, when seven-year-old Danielle van Dam disappeared from her family home in the middle of the night, every mother’s nightmare was played out on national television for almost a month while authorities searched for the girl. When Danielle’s body was found at the end of that month, the police and prosecutors discovered a frightening story about a neighbor of Danielle’s who had computer files filled with child pornography and even a sickening cartoon video of the rape of a young girl.

According to a report by Robert Peters, president of Morality in Media, on the link between pornography and violent sex crimes, the prosecutor in the Danielle van Dam case said “The video represented [the defendant’s] sexual fantasies and inspired the abduction, rape, and murder of Danielle.” According to Raymond Pierce, a retired NYPD detective who worked on the sex-crimes squad for many years and is now a criminal-profiling consultant, about 80 percent of rapists and serial killers are heavy pornography users. I was a victim of an attempted rape by a disturbed man who turned out to be involved in pornography.

May is Victims of Pornography Month. Today Senator Sam Brownback (R., Kan.), Rep. Katherine Harris (R., Fla.), Rep. Joe Pitts (R., Pa.), and leaders from the values community will participate in a summit to explore the troubling connection between pornography and violence against women and children.

Florida attorney general Charlie Crist advises parents that “we must never lose sight of the fact that sexual predators make the online world a dangerous place for innocent children. Parents must be ever-vigilant to make sure their children are not exposed to images and messages that would have been unthinkable just a generation ago.” Crist warns that we cannot allow the Internet to be a “pipeline for pornography aimed at children.” But while parents can use available means to protect their children when they are in their own homes, there is a cultural climate surrounding our children that threatens them the way Danielle van Dam was threatened. Because of the availability of pornography online, there is no way of knowing what lurks in the hearts of our neighborhoods.

More needs to be done to evaluate the connection between violent predatory behavior and pornography, and to crack down on these violent predators. Police and law-enforcement officers across the country report brutal instances in which those addicted to pornography utilized its sadistic images on their female and child victims.

Just this past February, the New York Times reported a story about a teenage babysitter who had raped three young children he was watching in their homes. According to the Times, his pattern was to watch pornographic videos with the oldest of the children, a 12-year-old boy, and intimidate them all by torturing them with a knife and threats to their family members. Perhaps one of the most notorious serial killers, Ted Bundy, participated in an interview with Dr. James Dobson shortly before he was executed. In the interview, Bundy explained, “I’ve lived in prison for a long time now. And I’ve met a lot of men who were motivated to commit violence like me. And without exception, every one of them was deeply involved in pornography — without exception, without exception — deeply influenced and consumed by an addiction to pornography.”

Since 1956, the Supreme Court has made clear that the First Amendment does not protect obscene materials. If we know from the perpetrators themselves how obscenity contributes to violence against women and children, what can we do?

We need to fund more studies of the addiction to pornography and its effects on violent behavior. Parents can install filters on any computer used by children and keep the family computer in a central location, not in a child's bedroom or someplace where parents might not regularly see it. We need to demand tougher law enforcement on the state and federal level. The Bush administration is stepping up federal enforcement of obscenity laws. This is a good first step. Contact the U.S. attorney for your district and ask what they are doing to enforce the laws. We need tougher state penalties against both possession and distribution of child porn and passing any kind of pornographic material to kids. Experts indicate that pornography is often used by pedophiles to break down the resistance of child victims. Parents should check out their state’s penalties for child rape and make sure offenders are going to jail and staying there for these offenses. Florida, for example, just passed a tough new law after the tragedy involving Jessica Lunsford, whose killer was a recently released violent offender. We should pass legislation to address the threat to children on the Internet. This includes chat sites, websites, spam, and peer-to-peer networks. Peer-to-Peer networks are of particular concern because they are widely visited by kids and offer porn for free without any age verification.

As Rep. Katherine Harris has pointed out, "Pornography displays human beings as objects, obliterating the wall between an individual's sick fantasies and the compulsion to act upon them. Often, the monsters who hurt women and children start with this malignant desensitizer." We need to all work together to find better ways to protect women and children against this violence.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: amencorner; artorsmut; daniellevandam; mim; needlebutts; porn; violence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 641-645 next last
Assuming life imitates art to a certain extent, here's the FR philosophical question o' the day...

So if life imitates art, and a piece of suppossed art models a destructive form of behavior that we would never want to see indulged, should that piece of art be banned?

1 posted on 05/19/2005 11:05:50 AM PDT by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Should get interesting - I'll save my two cents for later.


2 posted on 05/19/2005 11:08:36 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Post hoc ergo propter hoc violation. Every single one of those predators also drank water and ate bread at some point in their lives. This does not mean that bread and water drove them to predation.


3 posted on 05/19/2005 11:11:29 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
A classic catch-22...

Those "iffy" questions are such a pain!

4 posted on 05/19/2005 11:12:22 AM PDT by raivyn (http://www.petakillsanimals.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
So if people already are fully aware that Coca-Cola exists as a brand and manufactures soft drinks, and they know exactly where to buy Coca-Cola, why would the company waste millions of dollars on advertising it's products if the advertisements in and of themselves did not make more people buy coke?
5 posted on 05/19/2005 11:21:09 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("Every man's your brother 'til the rent comes due" - Anon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Wrong argument. I occassionally drink Coke as it tastes good. You appear to be trying to draw the corralary that I drink Coke because of the commercials. If that were true, I'd be drinking an equal amount of Pepsi wouldn't I?

"The Devil made me do it" is just laying blame elsewhere. I like porn. I have NEVER, nor would I EVER, become a sexual predator. Period.

6 posted on 05/19/2005 11:27:37 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

I've been around a fair number of people who -- what's the word, "consume"? "use"?, porn. I guess it depends to some extent how you define porn.

Playboy?

Women's bodice-ripper fiction?

At any rate, I don't think any of them were inspired to commit violence.

I agree that it's better to not expose yourself to certain types of images.

Personally, I don't watch explicit porn or gratuitously violent films, and that's fine by me, but I don't feel I should stop you as long as it's just fantasy.


7 posted on 05/19/2005 11:29:30 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defence of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
>>>>I like porn. I have NEVER, nor would I EVER, become a sexual predator. Period.

Thus no one else would either...hmm...

I guess if one person isn't allergic to bee stings, no one else could possibly be allergic either.
8 posted on 05/19/2005 11:30:08 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("Every man's your brother 'til the rent comes due" - Anon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Post hoc ergo propter hoc violation. Every single one of those predators also drank water and ate bread at some point in their lives. This does not mean that bread and water drove them to predation.

Drinking water and eating bread are socially unacceptable behavior? Your logic makes no sense.

Bad behavior sometimes leading to worse behavior does not take a huge amount of common sense to understand.

9 posted on 05/19/2005 11:30:36 AM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
One person uses a gun to commit a crime, so all of us gun owners are criminals?

Yeah, that logic works well doesn't it?

10 posted on 05/19/2005 11:31:52 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
Define "socially unacceptable". Most of my friends like porn as well. And no, I'm not a swinger either. Nor am I tempted to give it a try.

Excusing bad behavior never gets anywhere either.

11 posted on 05/19/2005 11:33:28 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Certain forms of pornography are already banned. I'm in favor of pushing the line back a lot further.


12 posted on 05/19/2005 11:33:38 AM PDT by Antoninus (Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini, Hosanna in excelsis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Every single one of those predators also drank water and ate bread at some point in their lives.

That is so weak. If a guy drinks a ton of beer, gets drunk and drives home, gets involved in a wreck, are you going to say the beer and the wreck are merely coincidental because he drank water at some time as well?

13 posted on 05/19/2005 11:33:57 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
The gun is not a medium conveying a message that encourages you to load it full of bullets and shoot somebody.

Watching "Natural Born Killers" or "Reservoir Dogs" may make a susceptible individual more likely to engage in violence, owning a gun simply provides them with a tool. Owning a Louisville slugger or an ax would provide them another, less efficient tool.
14 posted on 05/19/2005 11:35:06 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("Every man's your brother 'til the rent comes due" - Anon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
I like porn. I have NEVER, nor would I EVER, become a sexual predator. Period.

Are you married? If so, what does your wife have to say about your "hobby"?
15 posted on 05/19/2005 11:35:22 AM PDT by Antoninus (Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini, Hosanna in excelsis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
One person uses a gun to commit a crime, so all of us gun owners are criminals?

Yeah, that logic works well doesn't it?

Again, owning a gun is not a socially unacceptable behavior (Unless you're a liberal nut). Committing a crime is bad behavior. If you believe someone who commits a crime will not sometimes commit another crime (maybe even a worse crime) you are not being realistic.

16 posted on 05/19/2005 11:35:46 AM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
That isn't an equal argument and you damn well know it. I'd say you should be ashamed of yourself, but I also know you better than that.

Mrs. Grundy would be proud.

17 posted on 05/19/2005 11:35:54 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Commercials do not make you buy Coke. They influence your behavior.

Just as porn influences behavior.

But watch out. The Porn lovers will defend it to the death. Porn is the most sacred institution in the First Amendment.


18 posted on 05/19/2005 11:35:59 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
That isn't an equal argument and you damn well know it.

It's better than your water = porn argument

19 posted on 05/19/2005 11:36:50 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Hobby? Not exactly a hobby. Why? ARen't you getting any? Want to live vicariously through me? Or are you just trying to drum up a good head of rigtheous indignation?


20 posted on 05/19/2005 11:36:51 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 641-645 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson