Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: .cnI redruM

Certain forms of pornography are already banned. I'm in favor of pushing the line back a lot further.


12 posted on 05/19/2005 11:33:38 AM PDT by Antoninus (Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini, Hosanna in excelsis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Antoninus
If they can ban it on the public airwaves (radio and tv), why can't they ban it on the public internet?

I don't have to read any articles or studies to see that there is a direct correlation between pornography and sex crimes, murders, marital difficulties, etc.

Men seem to be more vulnerable to it addiction-wise, although some women seem to enjoy indulging male fantasies which may be acted out in real life and also making money in so doing.

141 posted on 05/19/2005 12:27:19 PM PDT by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Antoninus
Certain forms of pornography are already banned. I'm in favor of pushing the line back a lot further.

Well, before I, or anyone else, can intelligently comment on that, you'd first have to tell us how far back a lot is. Seriously, I've actually seen SI's Swimsuit issue defined as porn by some speakers writers.

How far back do you want to push the line? That's the important question. Even I think the line has gone too far these days, but that's not to say we agree, but until I know where you're drawing the line, it's not to say we disagree either.

325 posted on 05/19/2005 2:01:27 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson