Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newsweek Officially Retracts Story

Posted on 05/16/2005 2:02:57 PM PDT by kcvl

Per Fox News...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abughraib; americahaters; anewsweakexclusive; arrogance; basedonwhatwenowknow; bushahters; craptacular; crapweasels; deadtreemedia; dontforgetbgoldberg; duwisheditwastrue; fairlybiased; fifthcolumnists; flushitagain; goldbergisright; jackinbox2for1tacos; korandesecration; koranwatergate; lyingliars; mediabias; medialies; miketakeahike; mikethespikeisikoff; monicagate; newsweak; newsweek; newsweekliedppldied; notisikoffitsislam; ratweek; retraction; theybelieveanything; toiletgate; toiletwatergate; weeeearethechampions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-319 next last
To: mware
Want to bet it came from the State Dept. one of them left over from the last administration.

I'm just waiting for someone to charge that it was Karl Rove who planted the story - knowing full well the blow back Newstweak would receive over it.

He's brilliant ya know.....

161 posted on 05/16/2005 2:48:29 PM PDT by capydick ("The current tax code is a daily mugging." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: OESY; kristinn; Doctor Raoul; tgslTakoma; Congressman Billybob; hellinahandcart

Reuters quotes Newsweek editor Mark Whitaker: "We're not saying it absolutely happened but we can't say that it absolutely didn't happen either." Andrew Sullivan, who has long had an peculiar preoccupation with "torture" tales, endorses the fake-but-accurate standard of journalism: "I reiterate what I wrote Saturday: 'Even if this incident turns out to be false, our previous policies have made it perfectly plausible.' That's the deeper issue here."

So, Mr. Whitaker and Mr. Sullivan. Doesn't matter if it's true or not. You want it to be true so you wallow in the slime.

I see this is what passes for "liberal debate."

162 posted on 05/16/2005 2:49:06 PM PDT by sauropod (De gustibus non est disputandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

These phone and emails are burning up... Thanks


163 posted on 05/16/2005 2:49:12 PM PDT by Deetes (Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

"This just in from CBS News: The Isikoff story about the flushed Koran has been retracted by Newsweek. Although the story was true, there was no irrefutable evidence, and none could be manufactured in time. Newsweek overreached, but they overreached about the truth! Courage. Courage…"

164 posted on 05/16/2005 2:49:46 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Delenda est Liberalism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa

BTTT....


165 posted on 05/16/2005 2:49:53 PM PDT by veronica (CP = Jeffords Republicrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
"Newsweek owes the American people an apology"

Too late for apologizes! I don't need their stinking apology..I WANT THEM COMPLETELY obliterate from this country!
166 posted on 05/16/2005 2:50:06 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
"NEWSREEK!"

That's a good one.

Some others:

NEWSWRECK
NEWSPUKE
NEWSWEAK
NEWSSQUEEK
NEWSLEAK
NEWSFREAK

167 posted on 05/16/2005 2:50:09 PM PDT by Enterprise (Coming soon from Newsweek: "Fallujah - we had to destroy it in order to save it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan

The Rathergate fiasco, as bad as it was, did not cause the deaths and injury of innocent people.


168 posted on 05/16/2005 2:50:41 PM PDT by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Morons.


169 posted on 05/16/2005 2:50:45 PM PDT by mowkeka (The problem is they WANTED the story to be true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
Oh I get it. It's not their fault....the source made them do it.

Dispensation from Sesno just doesn't cut it for me.....sorry!

Send a message to NewsLeak.

Letters@newsweek

170 posted on 05/16/2005 2:50:49 PM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

Hmmmm - a big rope for their anchor?


171 posted on 05/16/2005 2:52:27 PM PDT by Enterprise (Coming soon from Newsweek: "Fallujah - we had to destroy it in order to save it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: rang1995

Hear Hear!


172 posted on 05/16/2005 2:53:08 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (The minutemen are ONLY doing a job that our government doesn't want to do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

LOL!
First it was "We MAY have erred", now a full retraction?
Maybe we can Dan Blather them too!


173 posted on 05/16/2005 2:53:08 PM PDT by Darksheare (What do you mean I'm that old? I am not! You can't prove it! I'm telling!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Newsweak lied, people died.


174 posted on 05/16/2005 2:54:01 PM PDT by lawdude (Liberalism is a mental disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
"Too late for apologizes! I don't need their stinking apology..I WANT THEM COMPLETELY obliterate from this country!"

I agree. I hope this puts them completely out of business, but even that won't be enough. But my point is that irresponsible media has already been responsible for the loss of American lives and they just don't GET IT!

175 posted on 05/16/2005 2:54:15 PM PDT by sageb1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Heads should roll but we all know they won't...

At least not at Newsweek. I'm sure they have elsewhere.

176 posted on 05/16/2005 2:55:43 PM PDT by Frapster (Don't mind me - I'm distracted by the pretty lights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf
I just went to the DU, those asterds are totally whacked. Most, no, all of them are in great need of medication. God help America if the dims ever get the White House again.

Some are saying they bet there was death threats from the WhiteHouse if newsweak didn't retract the story. They'll all nuts over there.

177 posted on 05/16/2005 2:55:53 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

And just using common sense and our own experience, we know the MSM would have checked, double/triple checked, done anything to stall a story getting out there, that was negative to the Clintons.


178 posted on 05/16/2005 2:56:20 PM PDT by YaYa123 (@The Democrats Must Live In Fear When Howard Dean and/or Harry Reid Take The Mike.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

NEWSTWEEK
:o)


179 posted on 05/16/2005 2:56:52 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (If you must filibuster, let the Constitution do the talkin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
Then the media would have gone to Klinton to ask for permission to print the story.

They would then be told it's old news, forget it.

180 posted on 05/16/2005 2:57:50 PM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-319 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson