Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Charges Dropped Against Army Reservist Accused Of Holding Group of Illegals At Gunpoint
KFYI - 550AM - Phoenix, AZ via PHXNews | 21 April 2005 | KFYI Hound

Posted on 04/21/2005 4:14:44 PM PDT by Spiff

KFYI is Reporting:

CHARGES HAVE BEEN DROPPED against Army reservist Patrick Haab who was accused of holding a group of illegals at gunpoint.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: aliens; borderintruders; borderinvasion; bordersecurity; bushamnesty; criminalinvaders; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; mmp; patrickhaab
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-206 next last
To: Spiff

But, but, but the race card ALWAYS surfaces when open borders advocates challenge the LAW and lose....


161 posted on 04/22/2005 5:35:13 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud

OK. Here's the bad news, friends. I fully expect leftist Democrat Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard to say that he's got enough evidence to charge Haab with a crime and that he "interprets" state law differently. Goddard has been hostile to anyone who has a problem with the horde of criminal invaders covering Arizona and his "interpretation" of Prop. 200 virtually gutted it when it was actually implemented. So, if my gut is right on this one, a victory celebration might be premature. We'll just have to wait and see.


162 posted on 04/22/2005 5:36:48 AM PDT by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: gatex
This Court's decisions expressly according differing protection to aliens than to citizens also undermine respondent's claim that treating aliens differently under the Fourth Amendment violates the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment.

Interesting, and I don't see how it can be squared with the plain sense of 18 USC 241. It may be that this decision is another example of judge-made law. But even absent any formal declaration of aliens' rights, it strains credulity to suppose that rights come from God but that His attention stops with Americans.

163 posted on 04/22/2005 5:38:01 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
But, but, but the race card ALWAYS surfaces when open borders advocates challenge the LAW and lose....

Every time one of the FROBLs implies that I'm a racist, I just remember the border security rally in Tucson where a bunch of masked thugs showed up, chanted "Viva la Raza!" and then called me a racist. I also remember the pierced freak, also masked, who was wearing a large swastika on her clothing who also called me a racist. These are the kind of people we're dealing with here. I'm surprised they know how to operate a computer, let alone post their put-America-last pro-invasion delusions on a conservative forum.

164 posted on 04/22/2005 5:41:35 AM PDT by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

And A$%^&^&*& GWB says we are vigilantes for wanting this mess ended.


165 posted on 04/22/2005 5:44:12 AM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Grut
Interesting, and I don't see how it can be squared with the plain sense of 18 USC 241. It may be that this decision is another example of judge-made law. But even absent any formal declaration of aliens' rights, it strains credulity to suppose that rights come from God but that His attention stops with Americans.

Your rights come from God. As Americans those rights are supposed to be protected by the U.S. Constitution. That protection should not apply to foreign nationals as the Constitution is an agreement between the several states and the limited Federal Government they formed under it. Foreign nations were not a party to the Constitution and therefore their citizens are not thus protected. Treaties allowing safe passage, etc. could be enacted.

166 posted on 04/22/2005 5:44:54 AM PDT by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

IF he (Goddard) did, IF it were me charged AGAIN, I'd sue Goddard for "double-jeopardy" infringement.


167 posted on 04/22/2005 5:57:27 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Spiff; Grut
"Foreign nations were not a party to the Constitution..."

Plain and simple - "We, the people of the United States..."

168 posted on 04/22/2005 6:00:04 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
Plain and simple - "We, the people of the United States..."

Oh yeah!? But what does Scottish Law, the UN Declaration of Human Rights, and international "consensus" say about it? That's what's more important. < /sarcasm >

169 posted on 04/22/2005 6:11:00 AM PDT by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Yeah, their attitude is "possession is 90% of the law". Illegals come here to possess.
170 posted on 04/22/2005 6:15:59 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

BTTT...


171 posted on 04/22/2005 6:25:47 AM PDT by in the Arena (Life may begin at 30, but it doesn't get real interesting until about 110.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

"I ate in a Panda's chinese restaurant today, every one of the help were illegal Mexicans."

"And how did you determine that?"

You want to be blind? That's your problem.

They were hispanic, low paid help, most only spoke spanish, and only a year ago the whole staff had been oriental. Are you telling me the immigation quota for Mexicans is millions per year? Give me a break. I could round up a thousand illegals in a day here in Vegas. If it were a trickle, I wouldn't have a problem, but it is a Tsunami.

And don't give me the racist crapola. I helped start one of the Spanish Television stations here in Las Vegas, I took the time to learn spanish, and after high school I even went to Honduras to help with a medical aid program.

But I don't care to see the country overrun by an uneducated horde who misuse welfare, populate our jails, break inumerable laws and act like locust. I don't care if that horde is from Mexico, or China, or Russia, or Eastern Eurpe or wherever, it is cultural suicide.


172 posted on 04/22/2005 7:35:06 AM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Protect our borders and coastlines from all foreign invaders!

Be Ever Vigilant!

Minutemen Patriots ~ Bump!


173 posted on 04/22/2005 7:59:35 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

Arpaio must have felt like he had been upstaged. LOL


174 posted on 04/22/2005 8:22:49 AM PDT by daybreakcoming ("Courage is being scared to death -- and saddling up anyway." - John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Amazing how a soldier could get in trouble for holding rogue, foreign invaders with no citizen rights at gunpoint. When does he get a medal? FReegards....


175 posted on 04/22/2005 8:25:18 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

"Yeah he did. They were criminals. Why can't you understand that?"

I didn't follow this closely. Someone told me they were looting campers. Is that true?

They don't even have any citizen rights, for goodness sake.


176 posted on 04/22/2005 8:26:34 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

"If true, this is great. It was stupid in the first place and the State of AZ owes him an apology."

Wrong...no apology. What he did is wrong and ARGUABLY against the law. He was let go strictly because the public sentiment was ignorant of the strict letter of citizens arrest statutes and the CA didn't want to come off bad.

If he is dumb enough to sue, they will hand him his ass on a brass plate. Were I the CA, I would have done the same thing. I would bet David Cantor, his atty is advising against any more public comment. Will be interesting to see if there is any more to follow.


177 posted on 04/22/2005 8:30:49 AM PDT by lawdude (Liberalism is a mental disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
I didn't follow this closely. Someone told me they were looting campers. Is that true?

I haven't followed the Habb case that closely, but the incident you're referring to is probably the one in Yuma that got the Yuma Patrol started.

Habb arrested 7+ illegals at a rest stop on I-8 in Maricopa County, nowhere near Yuma, and I don't think anyone was camping there.

178 posted on 04/22/2005 8:30:49 AM PDT by HiJinx (My Momma tol' me that if you gotta sneak, you're wrong...and you know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

That would be a frivolous suit since what he did was in self defense as dtermined by the DA not to prosecute.

Any attorney who would take a case of illegals against a soldier serving his country should be disbarred and deported.


179 posted on 04/22/2005 9:35:48 AM PDT by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
(sigh)

What he did is wrong and ARGUABLY against the law. He was let go strictly because the public sentiment was ignorant of the strict letter of citizens arrest statutes and the CA didn't want to come off bad.

Ok, what law did he break? He was minding his own business when he was charged by the group of illegals. He drew his weapon to protect himself (as he is entitled to do under the Constitution) and, suspecting that they were illegal aliens, he held them under citizens arrest until the Border Patrol arrived and he turned them over to the Border Patrol. There is nothing in that entire episode that is against any law.

In AZ, open carry is legal and his weapon is legally registered. No violation of law. He protected himself against what he felt was a threatening gesture made by the group who charged at him out of the dark while he was at a public rest area. The Constitution guarantees him the right to self-defense.

If any law was broken, IMO, it was the BP agents who asked the ILLEGAL ALIENS if they wanted to press assault charges against the AMERICAN CITIZEN who stopped their ILLEGAL INCURSION into the United States.

Finally, public sentiment doesn't carry a lot of weight in legal matters. If that were true, Michael Jackson wouldn't be on trial, the Smith guy who spit on Jane Fonda wouldn't be facing disorderly conduct, and Bubba Clinton would never have been impeached.
180 posted on 04/22/2005 9:51:16 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-206 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson