Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"The legislation requires a company with more than 10,000 employees to spend at least 8 percent of its payroll on worker health care. Otherwise, the company must pay the difference into a state fund to expand health coverage. "

In the 2004 election John Kerry and Democrats claimed that they would give tax incentives to businesses for hiring people. This was Kerry’s ‘big’ idea to show Bush up. The promise was ridiculous and outrageous as Democrats have a history of doing the opposite, taxing job creation like they are doing here. The SS payroll tax, Medicare tax, unemployment tax, income tax and now this medical benefits tax, all punish businesses for hiring people and democrats are constantly thinking of more.

Maryland has a huge supply of unskilled uneducated poor labor. These compassionate liberals are just outlawing the creation of jobs for these people(who the union does not represent), as well as raising the prices they have to pay. Stay tuned for more crocodile tears for the poor from Maryland liberals.

1 posted on 04/15/2005 5:24:34 AM PDT by marylandrepub1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marylandrepub1
"The legislation requires a company with more than 10,000 employees to spend at least 8 percent of its payroll on worker health care. Otherwise, the company must pay the difference into a state fund to expand health coverage. "

Gee, if John Q. Public tried that he'd be charged with extortion....

2 posted on 04/15/2005 5:27:51 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1

Is this constitutional, requiring any company to spend any of its money on any particular expense??


3 posted on 04/15/2005 5:30:45 AM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (You should be TERRIfied that you may someday be SCHIAVOed to death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1
Without a veto, Walmarts will be gone from there post haste.

Buh bye Merryland, hello Delaware. ;)

6 posted on 04/15/2005 5:34:12 AM PDT by G.Mason (If you are broken ... it is because you are brittle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1; Gabz

Great news! It always warms my heart when capitalism is further destroyed and the evil corporations get their due!

(Do I really need a sarc tag?)


7 posted on 04/15/2005 5:35:27 AM PDT by CSM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1

Wal-Mart needs to move out of Maryland, and let the state figure out what do with all those left unemployed.


8 posted on 04/15/2005 5:37:00 AM PDT by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1
This is why the government hates small business and loves and helps big companies so much, despite the occasional phony rhetoric from "progressive" Democrats. It's much easier politically to roll out National Health Care by coopting a few CEOs and pretending the system is remaining private than it would be to roll out a full scale HillaryCare plan with trumpets and cherubs.

When 90% of American work for big companies, belong to unions who negotiate with big companies, and get their health care in government-specified amounts through big companies, the Democrats will have achieved their dream of a socialist America through stealth.

9 posted on 04/15/2005 5:37:41 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Violence never settles anything." Genghis Khan, 1162-1227)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1
Exactly. Punish Wal-mart because it doesn't contribute to Democratic Party campaign coffers. This from the party that champions the interest of working people - put them out of work! Like Captain Ahab, the left's kooks must have their revenge.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
10 posted on 04/15/2005 5:37:45 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1

Tomorrow's headline...

"Walmart moves 5002 employees out of MD!"


12 posted on 04/15/2005 5:42:55 AM PDT by G Larry (Aggressively promote conservative judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1
"The legislation requires a company with more than 10,000 employees to spend at least 8 percent of its payroll on worker health care. Otherwise, the company must pay the difference into a state fund to expand health coverage. Wal-Mart is the only firm that would be affected."

Maryland Constitution

Art. 2. The Constitution of the United States, and the Laws made, or which shall be made, in pursuance thereof, and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, are, and shall be the Supreme Law of the State; and the Judges of this State, and all the People of this State, are, and shall be bound thereby; anything in the Constitution or Law of this State to the contrary notwithstanding.

This gives jurisdiction of the U.S. Constiutution within the boundaries of state of Maryland.

U.S. Constitution

Amendment V

"nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation."

Nixon v Shrink (2000)

Justice Stevens, comcurring.

"Therefore, I make one simple point. Money is property."

Amendemnt XIV

This Maryland law is blatantly unconstitutional.

With that being the case, Wal-Mart has the following remedy for the damages and injury they will incur:

HAFER v. MELO, 502 U.S. 21 (1991)

monetary damages under 42 U.S.C. 1983

"Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State . . . subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured. . . ."

We hold that state officials, sued in their individual capacities, are "persons" within the meaning of 1983. The Eleventh Amendment does not bar such suits, nor are state officers absolutely immune from personal liability under 1983 solely by virtue of the "official" nature of their acts.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is Affirmed.

Go get them stockholders of Wal-Mart, the individual owners of Wal-Mart.

13 posted on 04/15/2005 5:47:36 AM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1

If I were Wallmart I'd close up shop in maryland period.

Take the hit they can stand it.

With 10,000 newly unemployed in maryland I suspect the new
law will quietly go away into the mist of the moore.

My spell checker wants me to give maryland the "M" and I
will when they earn it.


14 posted on 04/15/2005 5:53:30 AM PDT by cleo1939
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1
Truth in advertising would have required the proposal to be called the "F##k Wal*Mart" bill. This is a really blatant attempt by Giant Foods and its unionized workforce to keep Wal*Mart from being able to do business.

The real kicker is that Wal*Mart is working on a distribution center on the Eastern Shore that would employ a significant number of people. The site happens to be in Senate Minority Leader J. Lowell Stoltzfus's (R - Somerset County) district.
17 posted on 04/15/2005 5:58:09 AM PDT by RebelBanker (To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1

I wonder if the State of Maryland passes this test for its workers? Note the law only seems to apply to businesses.


20 posted on 04/15/2005 6:07:56 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1

Ok, WalMart needs to sell off 1/3 of their Maryland stores to a subsidiary owned, but not operated by, WalMart.

In your eye, leftists!


25 posted on 04/15/2005 6:24:56 AM PDT by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1

Let's see, "Congress can't pass a bill regarding Schiavo because it would be a bill that is aimed at a single situation.......but......."


29 posted on 04/15/2005 6:42:16 AM PDT by cookcounty ("We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts" ---Abe Lincoln, 1858.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1
Apparently the State of Maryland did not read the newpaper stories about Walmart's reaction to the union in Quebec.....

Walmart......I await your NEXT STEP....

If this law takes hold it will surely spread.......

31 posted on 04/15/2005 6:49:35 AM PDT by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1
Maryland has a huge supply of unskilled uneducated poor labor.

They're already working - for the government.

43 posted on 04/15/2005 8:10:19 AM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1
I would expect that Wal Mart will simply close enough stores and lay off enough people until they are below the 10,000 employeee maximum. Maryland cannot constitutionally count employees in other states for this law and thus it can only apply to companies that employ 10,000 employees within its borders.

As an aside, Wal-Mart's full time employees have pretty good health care benefits. Better than my company offers. And anyone who only works part time and still needs health care benefits, ought to be looking for full time work. And anyone willing to work hard can get a full time job at Wal Mart.

47 posted on 04/15/2005 8:53:45 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1

I bet the state of Maryland employess more than 10,000.


52 posted on 04/15/2005 1:31:56 PM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marylandrepub1
I can't believe this is Free Republic.

Being in the Food Manufacturing Business and having dealt with Both Wal mart and Giant Food I can tell you that Wal Mart has been MUCH fairer to my company than Giant has.

The last pricing report I saw from Giant Foods had A-1 Steak Sauce in Giant Foods Retailing for $4.99.......It retails at Wal mart for $2.68.

This doesn't have anything to do with "Buying Power".....Wal Mart has streamlined their Distribution Process and drastically reduced their On Hand Inventory costs.

It has everything to do with MARGINS.....Wal Mart typically marks up at 22%.....Giant Marks up 40%

Giant also asks for at least $25,000 up front from the Manufacturer......which the manufacturer puts back in the cost of the goods.....which the consumer ends up paying for. This is called Slotting dollars.....Giant not only sells Groceries they sell Real Estate.....Shelf Real estate...... in inches.

Wal Mart Does not do this. IMO any retailer out their can compete with Wal mart.

1) Eliminate Slotting Dollar Practices.
2) Do not rely on 3rd party Distributors to House your Inventory.

But they won't do it....they are addicted to the easy money Trough of slotting practices.......they have their MBA's and were taught the specifics of category management at the Finest Universities......It works....just ask Winn Dixie.

Low Prices. Always.....THAT's Why people shop at Wal Mart....and that is the simple truth about the grocery business.
55 posted on 04/19/2005 5:08:13 AM PDT by scfirewall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson